2024 US Presidential Election Thread

  • Thread starter ryzno
  • 3,749 comments
  • 199,189 views
violent-day.jpg


Bring. It. On.

The rats need to be put down and it's only appropriate when they get violent, but then it is absolutely appropriate.
 
He says he doesn't care if this happens. We don't, either:



As for that chyron, 40 million is a bit of a reach considering only 129,000 wackos subscribed to the channel in 2022.
 
Last edited:
A MAGA who actually bothered to try & dig into some background info, I think is amongst their best.

It's just still very much terrible.
Bad Hombre wasn't trying very hard as he "exposed" the wrong Robert Lange and Kristina Chadwick as Democrats.

The real Farmer Bob ran for office and served as a Republican.
 
Last edited:
Lange and Chadwick seem like pretty common last names, especially on the east coast. Could be several of them in the same state.

A MAGA who actually bothered to try & dig into some background info, I think is amongst their best.

It's just still very much terrible.
Thought he was onto something, realized there are multiple people with the same name, cherrypicked the ones that didn't line up because he already had preconceived doubts, and now he's a Twitter celebrity. Sick.
 
Last edited:
Another former Republican endorses Kamala Harris:

Meanwhile betting website Polymarket gives Coach a 73% chance of beating Couch tomorrow:



While Trump is getting his excuses in early according to Axios:

 
Last edited:
Vance is a tool, and Walz is a good guy. But I think Vance and Walz will both keep it relatively tame. I think Vance can do a better job of staying on point than Trump, and Walz will not be anywhere near as adept as Kamala. Walz is a governor and teacher, but Kamala was a prosecutor. So I think it ends up much more even than Trump v. Harris.

I've definitely seen Walz get tripped up during speeches, and headlines are saying that he's already nervous. Vance is not going to come off as a human, but better than Trump almost for sure.

All of that being said, there is a huge difference between the two in terms of how relatable, genuine, and honest they are. So maybe Walz can just come off super friendly.
 
Last edited:
Another former Republican endorses Kamala Harris:
Edwards also endorsed Biden in 2020, while still a Republican (albeit one critical of the GOP for its embracing Trump and Trumpism so completely), but ended up leaving the party over January 6th (both the attack on the Capitol and the efforts inside to subvert the will of the voting public) and its subsequent support of Trump through the second impeachment.

It's actually very funny (I mean mostly because it's so very stupid) that there's a narrative going around among connie propagandists alleging that Edwards, so "central" to Heritage, authored Project 2025 in order to help Kamala. This is funny for a number of reasons, first and foremost being that Heritage so completely owns Project 2025 and is proud of it. It's also funny because though Edwards was a founding trustee, he hasn't been affiliated with it for like 20 years and he's basically persona non grata at the organization now, surely due in no small part to his having absolutely railed on current president Kevin Roberts.

lol. Oops.

defiant.jpg


It's amazing because Tristan Snell is very, very stupid (and/or expects those to whom he panders to be very, very stupid), and yet his tweet is completely unremarkable compared to the reply.
 

"Rudy Giuliani’s Daughter: Trump Took My Dad From Me. Please Don’t Let Him Take Our Country, Too"

Me too Caroline. Me too.
That Lev documentary must have been a hard watch for her.

I found this Harris endorsement by Scientific American (that Caroline linked to) an interesting read as well:
 
Last edited:
Back