Yes. People not voting rationally is the reason Trump won.
Which is illustrated by that image, how exactly?
That's fine. You were just lecturing people about not being informed or acting rationally and when you had the chance you didn't vote for success.
I don't care whether the media or the democratic party blames you. You'll have to live with this one forever. When you had the chance, you chose not to help. Not America, not Ukraine, not Palestinians. You chose to help Trump.
No. I did not have the chance to help Harris win. I did not have the chance to help the Democratic party win. A lot of that opportunity was taken away from me when the DNC decided not to hold a meaningful primary.
Now, more than ever, the Democratic party needs to change. I had the chance, and that's what I voted for. Because I want them to be strong enough to win outside of solid blue states. I chose to help the Democratic party figure out what's wrong with them. It's on them to get the message.
Your message to the Democratic party appears to be "You were just unlucky because of the economy, don't bother trying to learn from this"
I'm curious, who did you vote for in the primaries?
Rationalize all you want. And I will bring it up any time you lecture people how to vote rationally.
Feel free to continue to avoid engaging with the reasons for her failure.
Democrats have been lecturing for years that it's too risky to have a progressive candidate or platform, that every election is more important than the last, and therefore we can't afford to change strategy or push for popular policies. That even voting for a progressive in the primaries is too damaging to the cause. That courting republicans is the only way to win. And then they lose. Biden even won on a more progressive platform than Hillary had, and apparently they took this as a sign to turn the other way?
Centrist Democrats have been at the wheel for ages, and
they do not know how to drive. They need a lecture, desperately. They are all too happy to give one, but apparently unwilling to receive.
Elitist, or far left progressive ideals like open borders, pronouns, and the elimination of fossil fuels aren’t everyday working class American issues.
These are social issues, and are harder to run on. But there are everyday Americans who are immigrants, or LGBT, or living in areas affected by climate change. And average Americans should care about those people, even if they aren't themselves part of those groups.
Where progressives could make more inroads is economic policy. People suffering with medical bills, high food costs, low wages, etc. want to know what the government can do for them. And progressive policies on these issues are generally popular. Effective communication would help here. All most people think about is higher taxes—there needs to be clarity on how these things are paid for and how they directly benefit people. And not just the poorest Americans, but everyone.
Part of the problem is that for years Democrats have been joining the Republicans in condemning progressive policies as extreme, expensive, and unnecessary. Shooting themselves in the foot, essentially.
If the implication is supposed to be that the people who were fooled into voting third party or abstaining out of solidarity with Palestine (and yes, fooled is absolutely the correct term because all of the people who did were played just as thoroughly by the same damn person as the people who were convinced tariffs were going to fix everything) are in the clear just because the media hasn't yet stopped pointing fingers at Harris and (increasingly) Biden after three days, I've got some bad news for you for once they pick up on what's already happening to people who mentioned doing so before the election.
Sorry, who was I fooled by? I was listening to Palestinians, among others, not Trump (is that the implication?). Something Harris was apparently unwilling to do.
How many votes do you think Harris earned by refusing to allow a Palestinian American to speak at the DNC? That wouldn't have required Harris to commit to ending weapons shipments or anything, as far as I know.
And you missed the point about the media. The point is that neither the media nor the Harris campaign itself has speculated about a spoiler effect, while both bring up potential strategic mistakes of courting certain voters at the expense of other groups. Notably different from 2016.
Unless you think miraculously you won't be a punching bag for it for years to come like people who openly promoted Nader or Johnson still are.
Oh god, I've made a huge mistake! I should have based my decisions on what would make people like me!