I'm surprised no-one's mentioned the charging of a South Carolina police officer with the murder of an unarmed black man here. BBC
From the look of the video it's a pretty open and shut case although you can't see whether they struggled and for how long. Still, there was no present threat as the guy was running away and didn't have a weapon.I'm surprised no-one's mentioned the charging of a South Carolina police officer with the murder of an unarmed black man here. BBC
The forensic evidence would still point to the cops guilt. No powder burns on the victim, no weapon, likely no injuries to the officer. I think the only way he would have gotten away with it is if he planted a gun on him.Imagine what would have happened if someone wasn't filming. This would be just another statistic.
Normally I would say that it's a problem that many police officers are taught that their lives are always in peril and that everybody is out to get cops. This leads to a very twitchy and aggressive mindset that can turn misunderstandings into violence. This, on the other hand, seems like straight murder. The man was unarmed, running away, and you have his car. There's simply no justification for lethal force.
The forensic evidence would still point to the cops guilt. No powder burns on the victim, no weapon, likely no injuries to the officer. I think the only way he would have gotten away with it is if he planted a gun on him.
But the officer insisted that the two fought over a tazer. A gun plant wouldn't add up the facts if he wanted to get off.I think the only way he would have gotten away with it is if he planted a gun on him.
A gun plant would have given the officer the excuse to shoot, if he could plant the gun with the victim's fingerprints on it. Even if the gun held no bullets he could have said he got away from the struggle, turned and pointed a gun at me, then kept running so I shot him. Of course the video would have negated that, but in the absence of video and credible eyewitnesses, it would have worked.But the officer insisted that the two fought over a tazer. A gun plant wouldn't add up the facts if he wanted to get off.
Besides, the cop just killed a service member (the victim was Coast Guard). Any excuse to fry him just doubled.
There are many different cases of things where the person clearly in the wrong comes away from court better than their victim. Whenever a case like these happen I am befuddled at how this can happen. It's amazing what you can achieve with a decent lawyer in a highly litigious society.So, the Daily show had a bit about rapists.
Apparently there are plenty of states where rapists have the rights of the father.
...
What the hell.
There are many different cases of things where the person clearly in the wrong comes away from court better than their victim. Whenever a case like these happen I am befuddled at how this can happen. It's amazing what you can achieve with a decent lawyer in a highly litigious society.
The lengthy and closely followed case featured 135 witnesses (132 by the Commonwealth) and 439 pieces of evidence in 41 days
I'm surprised no-one's mentioned the charging of a South Carolina police officer with the murder of an unarmed black man here. BBC
Just as there wasn't enough bad press surrounding police in the USA, a 73-year-old millionaire volunteer deputy in Tulsa, Oklahoma, accidentally shot a black man instead of tazing him. While the volunteer appeared to show remorse, the officer accompanying him taunted the mortally wounded man, and said "🤬 your breath". Telegraph link
Let's continue this trend.
When shooting a armed suspect gets a bit boring!
The story is that the guy was probably seeking for suicide by cop, and this GTA action most likely saved his life.
It's so easy to assess things in hindsight from your couch. What would you have done differently I might ask? Waited for him to walk around some more and increase the risk that he takes a potshot at the first person he sees? Buy him a coke and hope he cools off? Shoot him? Tazer him? Tell us what you would have done differently.I'd say you're fired, moron! Police are taught to take a controlled calculated risk. Nothing that happened in that video is controlled or calculated. The cops actions put the public in the same danger as perpetrator!
Just another criminal getting what he deserved.I say job well done.
Just another criminal getting what he deserved.
It's so easy to assess things in hindsight from your couch. What would you have done differently I might ask? Waited for him to walk around some more and increase the risk that he takes a potshot at the first person he sees? Buy him a coke and hope he cools off? Shoot him? Tazer him? Tell us what you would have done differently.