- 33,155
- Hammerhead Garage
And then, without so much as a second thought as to where it might lead, Alice plunged head-first down the rabbit hole.
Do you have a source that shows the contents of his thoughts?And then, without so much as a second thought as to where it might lead, Alice plunged head-first down the rabbit hole.
Ooooh, clever! Ignore the obvious reference to Alice in Wonderland and the content of the story for the sake of a cheap jab.Do you have a source that shows the contents of his thoughts?
I will wait with bated breath, marvelling at today's mind-reading technology.
Do you have a source that shows the contents of his thoughts?
I will wait with bated breath, marvelling at today's mind-reading technology.
"Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper. Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle." - Thomas Jefferson, 208 years ago.
Trump is in good company I suppose.
"Were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter." - Thomas Jefferson, before he became President."Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper. Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle." - Thomas Jefferson, 208 years ago.
Trump is in good company I suppose.
No, that's not how that played out. The jab came from you, in an unsolicited post, based at least in part on something you cannot know. If I'm to believe that you don't universally manufacture false knowns, I'm left thinking that you must do it selectively. I don't give rat's about defending Trump, but I do care about defending against that sort of inconsistent trash.Ooooh, clever! Ignore the obvious reference to Alice in Wonderland and the content of the story for the sake of a cheap jab.
Seems he's lowered your defences with his approach. I don't know what goes on behind the clownish facade, but I know that some people don't mind at all being viewed as a clown if it leaves them freer to ply their covert trade for the greater "good".We don't really need to probe the content of his thoughts, Trump seems quite willing to verbalize whatever stupid idea pops into his mind.
Seems he's lowered your defences with his approach. I don't know what goes on behind the clownish facade, but I know that some people don't mind at all being viewed as a clown if it leaves them freer to ply their covert trade for the greater "good".
It's pretty simple, really: he wasn't Hillary.How such a person could have persuaded a big chunk of the American electorate to vote for him is possibly the most astonishing thing to have occurred in international politics in my lifetime. The GOP has elected to go along for the ride, but I don't think this is going to end well for anyone.
I dont think you understand how many Americans WANT our government turned upside down and shaken like a crying baby. Our government is broken and no longer works at all, let alone together. Somehow they have come to believe their job is to oppose the other "side" not come up with compromises. This is a first of many attempts (I hope) to right this sinking ship.It's very hard to know what's really going on under that peculiar pompadour - you'd have to get to know him as a "person" to figure that one out. But my best guess is that he, himself, doesn't see his behaviour as "clownish" - in fact that characterization is clearly extremely offensive to him - that there's no "covert trade" & he has no real interest in the "greater good". I don't think there's any meaningful political agenda at work, no deeply felt belief system. It's not political calculation. I think (incredibly) that what you see is actually what he is: a man so oddly & reflexively narcissistic that it dictates everything he does & says.
How such a person could have persuaded a big chunk of the American electorate to vote for him is possibly the most astonishing thing to have occurred in international politics in my lifetime. The GOP has elected to go along for the ride, but I don't think this is going to end well for anyone.
I prefer his views when he was older, wiser and more experienced. Nice try though."Were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter." - Thomas Jefferson, before he became President.
I prefer his views when he was older, wiser and more experienced. Nice try though.
It wasn't mined from any source, it was in the link provided. Nice try though.The quote from PM stands in context though, yours was mined from a wider source that qualifies your quote with a slightly different meaning - and certainly a different meaning from Trump's ideas. Nice try though.
To your request of my opinion of the manner in which a newspaper should be conducted, so as to be most useful, I should answer, "by restraining it to true facts & sound principles only." Yet I fear such a paper would find few subscribers. It is a melancholy truth, that a suppression of the press could not more compleatly deprive the nation of it's benefits, than is done by it's abandoned prostitution to falsehood. Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper. Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle [...] I will add, that the man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them; inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods & errors. He who reads nothing will still learn the great facts, and the details are all false.
As for what is not true, you will always find abundance in the newspapers. - Thomas Jefferson
I dont think you understand how many Americans WANT our government turned upside down and shaken like a crying baby. Our government is broken and no longer works at all, let alone together. Somehow they have come to believe their job is to oppose the other "side" not come up with compromises. This is a first of many attempts (I hope) to right this sinking ship.
More news from the pussification front. 🤬 these students and their special snowflake feelings, honestly.
If they don't want to hear what he has to say, they could just not attend. They are boo whooing over something frivolous really.Absolutely, people should be forced to accept separatism and forced to think as you wish them too! Utter pussification*!
*Oh purlease.
If they don't want to hear what he has to say, they could just not attend. They are boo whooing over something frivolous really.
Why do you have to "recognize" his authority as an attendee at your graduation ceremony? What authority does he have giving a speech? If they don't like it, and their feelings are going to be so hurt by listening to someone they disagree with, don't go. Feel free to tell everyone you aren't going to go. Shout it from the rooftops. But threatening further measures if you don't get your way...nah...I don't know when/where you passed your degree but I presume you took your graduation ceremony very seriously.
It would be one thing inviting the Dalai Lama to speak at the University as an attendance-optional event (I've heard him speak, he's intelligent and compelling), it's another to shoehorn his speech into a graduation ceremony. Students have two choices; be at the ceremony or don't. For Chinese students who don't recognise authority in the Dalai Lama or who don't want to hear him speak that does seem unfair.
The closest parallel I can think of is the British King or Queen being invited to speak at a graduation ceremony - I refuse to recognise a United Kingdom and so would be unable to bring myself to attend.
If it's good enough for a presidential nominee threatening to challenge the results of an election if he doesn't win, it's good enough for the rest of us.But threatening further measures if you don't get your way...nah...
Because it's the same thing right?If it's good enough for a presidential nominee threatening to challenge the results of an election if he doesn't win, it's good enough for the rest of us.
In essence, yes. Both threatened further disruptions if they didn't get their way.Because it's the same thing right?
Remind me, who complained about their opponents paying for supporters?