- 9,262
- Corsham
- lipming
Did chemical weapons even exist back then? Germany was at the forefront of military technology, so if they had them they certainly would have used them.
I believe mustard gas was manufactured - and possibly used - during World War I.Did chemical weapons even exist back then? Germany was at the forefront of military technology, so if they had them they certainly would have used them.
Did chemical weapons even exist back then?
Germany was at the forefront of military technology, so if they had them they certainly would have used them.
I'd hate to imagine the intense euphoria in the darkest depths of 4chan right now, thinking that "senpai" noticed them.He managed to do this on Pesach. Slow hand clap.
Throwing people with the plague with catapults, giving Native Americans smallpox blankets...Chemical warfare has existed since antiquity. People might sneer at how crude they were and therefore don't meet the definition of a "chemical weapon" but poisoned arrows, poisoned water, turpentine bombs, Greek fire, sulfur bombs and burning bitumen have all been used by the ancient Greeks, the ancient Chinese, the Romans and early modern Europeans to kill people in wars, sieges or peacetime.
Against Hitler, in fact.I believe mustard gas was manufactured - and possibly used - during World War I.
Throwing people with the plague with catapults, giving Native Americans smallpox blankets...
I just saw that. I didn't want to hear about linking TMZ again.New video has emerged from the United incident where the passenger appears to say at one point, "you can drag me out I'm not going". I wonder if that could be construed as implied consent to drag him out.
Wouldn't that mean that if he protested on the way out then he'd be withdrawing his consent? Perhaps "no takey backies" is enshrined in the customer contract.New video has emerged from the United incident where the passenger appears to say at one point, "you can drag me out I'm not going". I wonder if that could be construed as implied consent to drag him out.
Against Hitler, in fact.
United say that they asked for volunteers; when they got no takers, they chose four people at random. Dao, on the other hand, has reportedly suggested that he was chosen because he is Chinese; I say "reportedly" because none of the stories I have read about it quote him directly. I'm not sure if I believe either version.I'd be interested to know why Dao was chosen as one of the four for "voluntarily" giving up his seat and not someone else, after he was resistant to the idea.
I doubt it. It's hard to tell exactly what happened since all of the footage is obscured by seats and people, but it looks like he fought back pretty hard.I wonder if that could be construed as implied consent to drag him out.
Uhm... Chlorine and mustard gas are the first things coming to my mind when I think of World War I (the next are trenches, barbed wire and landships). Hitler himself was caught in a mustard gas attack and turned blind for some time. But the most probable reason why toxicants weren't widely used on the battlefields of WWII was their low effectivety in the conditions of WWII (more dynamic combat because of wider use of vehicles + effective chemical protection was invented). However, the Nazis used poison gases (carbon monoxide and Zyklon B) in gas chambers of concentration camps.Did chemical weapons even exist back then? Germany was at the forefront of military technology, so if they had them they certainly would have used them.
What's the opposite of integrity?
He was obviously talking about the battlefield. And you know that.
Holocaust centers or concentration camps, I am not sure when the term 'holocaust' was coined, but what the hell difference does it make. Again, you know what he meant, and so did the news media.
But they make enough of a big deal out of this nothing story to make it the lead. Do you really think Spicer doesn't know about the holocaust? Give me a break.
This is nothing more than the media grasping at low hanging fruit to discredit the Trump administration.
Why don't they spend more time looking at why Susan Rice was doing what she was doing.
Probably machine guns were the deadliest factor of WW1, and the signature weapon.Uhm... Chlorine and mustard gas are the first things coming to my mind when I think of World War I (the next are trenches, barbed wire and landships). Hitler himself was caught in a mustard gas attack and turned blind for some time. But the most probable reason why toxicants weren't widely used on the battlefields of WWII was their low effectivety in the conditions of WWII (more dynamic combat because of wider use of vehicles + effective chemical protection was invented). However, the Nazis used poison gases (carbon monoxide and Zyklon B) in gas chambers of concentration camps.
Actually, it was artillery that caused the most casualties in the war.Probably machine guns were the deadliest factor of WW1, and the signature weapon.
This was the lead story on ABC's World News Tonight. The lead story! This is barely news at all. There is not a person here, or in that newsroom that doesn't know what he meant, but it was the **** the Trump administration story of the day.
Well, actually I think it's one more example of the stupidity of the Trump administration. Claiming that Assad is worse than Hitler in order to defend Trump's about-face on intervening in Syria is just ... stupid.
Meanwhile, designs/bids are being considered for Trump's 'border wall' with Mexico... one of the most visually appealing designs looks like this, although see if you can spot the design feature that Trump might disapprove of...
http://www.realclearlife.com/design/hyperloop-system-proposed-bid-president-trumps-border-wall/
Meanwhile, little Marianna's father is at work, cleaning up all the dead eagles that hit the windows.How do we know that the gaps aren't filled with self cleaning bullet proof glass, so little Marianna's mother can say
"See that land over there is where the might freedom eagle flies! Land of dreams!"
Outegrity.What's the opposite of integrity?
How fickle and easily manipulated are the media!?
A few weeks ago they were comparing Trump to Hitler. Now they are outraged by comparing Assad to Hitler.
It seems to me that "Presduntial proxy" artfully changed the narrative. I think he knew exactly what he was doing, even though he needed to play the fool.There's a difference between the expected output of the kind of publication that would make a Trump/Hitler comparison as a "serious" topic and a claim by a Presduntial proxy that Hitler didn't in fact use chemical weapons when Hitler definitely killed a lot of people with them.