UKMikey
Premium
- 18,292
- Grea'er Laandan
- UKMikeyA
- UKMikeyA
Erm... what? Since when was it the press's job to hunt down criminals?I know you are but what am I?
Erm... what? Since when was it the press's job to hunt down criminals?I know you are but what am I?
I was talking about CNN and their choice of content and you completely avoided responding to that and instead talked about Trump. Do you have a comment about CNN, a national news organization chasing down and, IMO, basically threatening a 15 year old child over a humourous gif, or is "I think Trump is an idiot" your go to response whenever you have nothing to add?Erm... what? Since when was it the press's job to hunt down criminals?
CNN are bad and they should feel bad. As for going after Trump all the time I think you're confusing me with another poster.I was talking about CNN and their choice of content and you completely avoided responding to that and instead talked about Trump. Do you have a comment about CNN, a national news organization chasing down and, IMO, basically threatening a 15 year old child over a humourous gif, or is "I think Trump is an idiot" your go to response whenever you have nothing to add?
My mistake then, I missed the sarcasmCNN are bad and they should feel bad. As for going after Trump all the time I think you're confusing me with another poster.
https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/sear...post&o=date&c[user][0]=152020&c[thread]=54029
I'm just saying that both situations in your post would be equally ridiculous.
Like what, some crazy Robert Mugabe wannabe doxxing Fox News's white employees? I wouldn't shed a tear for them either.Sure would love to know if you would be this anti-anonymity if the roles were reversed.
More like Fox News doxxing some anti-Trump memester and forcing out an apology or his real identity suddenly becomes public?Like what, some crazy Robert Mugabe wannabe doxxing Fox News's white employees? I wouldn't shed a tear for them either.
Personally, I'm just loving the irony of some alt-right garbage person being threatened with an unmasking. I'd hazard a guess that if it was some oxygen thief from Daesh posting a list of CNN's Jewish employees on their own forums, you wouldn't be so pro-anonymity.
*That moment when the current page of comments in the America thread is populated entirely by posts from non-American members.*
Works for me though, glad you guys are interested in US goings-on I guess.
What are the rampant 3rd world type problems does the U.S. have?Well I look at it as the USA is the most advanced country to have the most rampant 3rd world type problems and now an erratic thinking president who controls one of the largest militaries in the world. Of course it's captivating, the general plot arc since Barack was elected almost followed to a T what hour long TV dramas have to do to stay on TV for the same period of time. Once you hit season 6-8 you have to change it up a lot, now it seems like chaos compared to what it used to be.
That reminds me, I need to watch The West Wing all the way through.
CNN gets bullied by Trump is a sign that could spell "the day freedom of press dies". CNN in return, spends its time tracking down a meme creator and is now facing backlash by the internet community for potentially blackmailing the creator by going, "If you don't apologize for making a meme out of us, we'll show everyone you're a racist!"The day the media cannot criticise the government for fear of reprisal - however (seemingly) benign - is the day freedom of the press dies. And a free press is usually the first casualty of a dictagirship.
So I guess the day is upon us now where a citizen cannot criticize the media without fear of reprisal. All this over a silly gif.CNN is not publishing "HanA**holeSolo's" name because he is a private citizen who has issued an extensive statement of apology, showed his remorse by saying he has taken down all his offending posts, and because he said he is not going to repeat this ugly behavior on social media again. In addition, he said his statement could serve as an example to others not to do the same.
CNN reserves the right to publish his identity should any of that change.
It's no surprise our 3 resident bleeding Liberals found more offense with the creator than the fact a major news network spent time tracking down some random Joe b/c he made fun of them.Forgive me if my heart doesn't bleed for a racist's anonymity not being as foolproof as he once thought.
Gang culture primarily, I'd say as an outsider.What are the rampant 3rd world type problems does the U.S. have?
God forbid that this garbage person exercises some personal responsibility!It's no surprise our 3 resident bleeding Liberals found more offense with the creator than the fact a major news network spent time tracking down some random Joe b/c he made fun of them.
Has there been proof he's a racist? Or is the media doing what they did to PewDiePie and other online personalities by purposely editing videos & statements to get the desired reaction?
What are the rampant 3rd world type problems does the U.S. have?
So what kinda consequences would you want this guy to suffer if his name does end up on the news at the end of this blackmail campaign?God forbid that this garbage person exercises some personal responsibility!
You want a sample of this guy being a garbage person? NSFW language, includes racial slurs.
He's a degenerate piece of ****.God forbid that this garbage person exercises some personal responsibility!
You want a sample of this guy being a garbage person? NSFW language, includes racial slurs.
Threatening to release his identity to the public if he says anything they don't like after his apology is still pretty scummy, though. But, as you said, that's poor form on Kaczynski's part.All this drama over a silly meme-y video, of which the only possible issue was Trump's retweeting of it.
There's nothing offensive about the video. It's not racist, sexist, inciting violence, or anything crazy like that... it's essentially just a juvenile metaphor expressing something we already know (How Trump feels about CNN and/or how his followers view the whole Trump vs. CNN/"fake news" issue). And regardless of how offensive/ignorant its creator's beliefs may be, he did nothing wrong by creating the dumb video due to its aforementioned lack of offensiveness and therefore had no need to apologize in the first place.
CNN has certainly been blowing this thing out of proportion, and the apparent pseudo-threat of pseudo-doxing the creator was poor form on the part of Andrew Kaczynski. But let's be real here, CNN as an organization is not actually blackmailng this random dude for making that stupid video. Of course... that's not stopping the other side is running with it and twisting it to make it sound worse than it actually is.
People sure do like making mountains out of mole hills, don't they?
All this drama over a silly meme-y video, of which the only possible issue was Trump retweeting of it.
There's nothing offensive about the video. It's not racist, sexist, inciting violence, or anything crazy like that... it's essentially just a juvenile metaphor expressing something we already know (How Trump feels about CNN and/or how his followers view the whole Trump vs. CNN/"fake news" issue). And regardless of how offensive/ignorant its creator's beliefs may be, he did nothing wrong by creating the dumb video due to its aforementioned lack of offensiveness and therefore had no need to apologize in the first place.
CNN has certainly been blowing this thing out of proportion, and the apparent pseudo-threat of pseudo-doxing the creator was poor form on the part of Andrew Kaczynski. But let's be real here, CNN as an organization is not actually blackmailng this random dude for making that stupid video. Of course... that's not stopping the other side is running with it and twisting it to make it sound worse than it actually is.
People sure do like making mountains out of mole hills, don't they?
Put yourself in this guys shoes.But let's be real here, CNN as an organization is not actually blackmailng this random dude for making that stupid video. Of course... that's not stopping the other side is running with it and twisting it to make it sound worse than it actually is.
People sure do like making mountains out of mole hills, don't they?
Original comment:
CNN is not publishing "HanA**holeSolo's" name because he is a private citizen who has issued an extensive statement of apology, showed his remorse by saying he has taken down all his offending posts, and because he said he is not going to repeat this ugly behavior on social media again. In addition, he said his statement could serve as an example to others not to do the same. CNN reserves the right to publish his identity should any of that change.
It's not twisting anything. He said it. We reserve the right to publishing your identity, if you keep posting whatever alt-right garbage you were. But it's not just that, it's the fact that they considered it some sort of trophy, that they have this internet troll's head hanging on their wall, just because he made a gif. And they haven't repudiated their statement at all. It's still there. It's just that they clarified that they aren't social justice vigilantes looking to use their power to blackmail a troll, they are simply using their power to humiliate a troll, and I suppose there's a difference.
TMK, CNN's story is that they never talked to the guy, that he deleted and apologized all on his own before ever speaking to Kaczynski. They don't dwell much on the fact that they reached out to him in the first place beforehand, which as @Chrunch Houston alluded to, probably scared the crap out of him into doing what he did.Well according to tweets from Andrew Kaczynski, he talked to the guy post-"threat" and he didn't interpret it as being threatened by CNN. This could be a bald-faced lie, of course... but nobody knows one way or the other, aside from the guy and Kaczynski.
They're all for attacking the POTUS and using "anonymous sources" to no end
Informed or lied to, to push their agenda?and we as a citizenry would be significantly less-informed without them.
Informed or lied to, to push their agenda?
You can't use an anonymous source as a witness in court.
A little off-topic, but I remain baffled that people suddenly think this is a problem.
News organizations have relied on anonymous sources for ages, and we as a citizenry would be significantly less-informed without them.