- 216
- Australia
Assetto Corsa PC Mods General DiscussionPC
- Thread starter daan
- 139,169 comments
- 38,248,110 views
Are you making it as a 440R or as a 400R? I doubt that the specs on tech racing wikidot are incorrect.
I am curious, did you check the specs of the 360 Modena against the RSS model? RSS don't necessarily make their cars exact to what we think they are, probably due to licensing reasons. I know their physics are not all accurate.
To me, on track, your model looks the size of a Corvette especially in the width.
The important thing from a physics point is to have the wheelbase and width correct which then affects the track and will allow more accurate tyre sizing.
I had the same problem with the driver on my gtr2 model but I managed to make it work with the animated shifter and seat belts.
Strange that your system crashes with the damage/dirt shader. I make all my cars with it now and have no issues. Maybe it's the textures you tried? The ones from kunos models should work but I use the ones from the Assetto garage (AG) Audi R8 LMP which work well
- 1,250
- United States
Fooling around a little with Mugello. Maybe I need to brown it up a bit to match the stock look, but the weird 'crop circles' are gone from the outlying grass areas.
Last edited:
- 464
- Pizza
Let me explain.
From what emerged from my research, the TVR Typhon/Tuscan T400R/T440R are practically the same car whose name has changed over time. So the blueprint with the measurements (the one I posted previously) is valid for all three denominations. The first thing I did was to measure both models in length. Once I imported the models into blender, I measured them:
360 gtc/modena by RSS--> 4.48 m (0.026 m less than the real Ferrari measurements)
TVR converted from GTR2 without modifications --> 3.90m (50 and more cm less than the blueprint)
TVR upscaled --> 4.42 (0.02 m more than the blueprint)
Let's say that 0.02m are negligible margins of error, 50 and more cm are not.If the GTR2 model was exactly proportioned, the other two dimensions should also be approximately correct. Unfortunately, as you may have noticed, only the width is slightly off (1.85 over mirror against the upscaled 1.87 and 1.77 against 1.90 upscaled*) . The only thing I can think of is that the model isn't perfectly proportioned. The other element that makes me understand that the measurements in the blueprint are actually his is that the wheelbase coincides with the upscaled 3D model (2.574 brought to 2.58 in AC for that 0.02 difference in length). If the length coincides, the wheelbase as well as the height, then I assume that the model had to be upscaled.
As for the wheels, I have to explain myself better this time too. The dimensions were deliberately increased to avoid clipping with the asphalt (beta version) because I had already enlarged them in the Tsunoda version trying to respect the measurements (by doing the upscaling they became larger, now I have already fixed them with the right measurements).
Having read that in GTR2 there are several errors in aerodynamics, physics, etc., I wouldn't want them to have also been made on a graphic/measurement level.
EDIT: let's be clear, I don't want to impose myself. I've just checked and experimented several times and I've come to this conclusion.
*1.90 refers to the width at the rear, the widest part of the car. Tightening it by 0.12 it would no longer have the over mirror measurements, so I assume it has been widened in the racing version or in any case it is not exactly like in reality.
Last edited:
- 163
- Brazil
Does anyone knows if there is any grass extension config to Terra's Reims 67?
I was using Gilles' version until recently, but I ended up discovering this Terra version, which is much more detailed and eye-candy. The only downfall is that it doesn´t have grass.
I was using Gilles' version until recently, but I ended up discovering this Terra version, which is much more detailed and eye-candy. The only downfall is that it doesn´t have grass.
- 10
- Germany
Imola looks so great
Thanks
Grass and Grooves : racinjoe013
Trees : TheNuvolari
balloons,billboards etc. : Delta7Fox
- 2,189
- Helsinki
Little patch for my Radical SR8-RXRadical SR8-RX v1.01
changelog v1.01
features:
- tires adjusted/normalied for grip/wear across compounds
- brake.ini HEADER fixed and small reduction in brake power
- base FFB raised a small ammount
- dyno matched powerplant
- real spec drivetrain
- front canards visuals matched to wing value
- 26 team liveries
- complete specs and tuning documentation from Radical (./dev-info folder)
- super fun for hotlapping, AI and hilclimb
:: DOWNLOAD v1.01 ::
- fixed exhaust/smoke location
Car download ::here::
Last edited:
- 508
- Japan
Hitchin Town v1.01
View attachment 1317326
Fictional street circuit in England.
Conversion from GTR2.
-CSP recommended
-24 pit/start
-AI, cam
Credits & Thanks;
GTR2 Original Track by Richard Lovewell
-I tried to contact them but could not find their contact information. Thank you for his work.
AC Converted by @shi (shin956)
logo.png by @Fanapryde
Crowds texture by @Kniker97
some textures by kunos
Test and Feedback by @Breathe
Download (mediafire)
Enjoy.
Converted upon request by Patreon member Steven Barnes.
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
v1.01 changelog;
Added spectators. (Thanks Alguecool for the suggestion.)
Hitchin Town v1.01
The link is in the quote.
v1.01 changelog;
Added spectators. (Thanks @Alguecool for the suggestion.)
The plot thickens on the TVR 400R. Only 7 ever built for competition. It appears the first 3 at least built in 2001 indeed have the smaller dims which it seems likely is the same as TVR Tuscan road car and what tech-racingcars.wikidot have quoted. The last 4 which I gather is the 2 Chamberlain and 2 LNT cars have the larger dims listed here:Let me explain.
From what emerged from my research, the TVR Typhon/Tuscan T400R/T440R are practically the same car whose name has changed over time. So the blueprint with the measurements (the one I posted previously) is valid for all three denominations. The first thing I did was to measure both models in length. Once I imported the models into blender, I measured them:
360 gtc/modena by RSS--> 4.48 m (0.026 m less than the real Ferrari measurements)
TVR converted from GTR2 without modifications --> 3.90m (50 and more cm less than the blueprint)
TVR upscaled --> 4.42 (0.02 m more than the blueprint)
Let's say that 0.02m are negligible margins of error, 50 and more cm are not.If the GTR2 model was exactly proportioned, the other two dimensions should also be approximately correct. Unfortunately, as you may have noticed, only the width is slightly off (1.85 over mirror against the upscaled 1.87 and 1.77 against 1.90 upscaled*) . The only thing I can think of is that the model isn't perfectly proportioned. The other element that makes me understand that the measurements in the blueprint are actually his is that the wheelbase coincides with the upscaled 3D model (2.574 brought to 2.58 in AC for that 0.02 difference in length). If the length coincides, the wheelbase as well as the height, then I assume that the model had to be upscaled.
As for the wheels, I have to explain myself better this time too. The dimensions were deliberately increased to avoid clipping with the asphalt (beta version) because I had already enlarged them in the Tsunoda version trying to respect the measurements (by doing the upscaling they became larger, now I have already fixed them with the right measurements).
Having read that in GTR2 there are several errors in aerodynamics, physics, etc., I wouldn't want them to have also been made on a graphic/measurement level.
EDIT: let's be clear, I don't want to impose myself. I've just checked and experimented several times and I've come to this conclusion.
*1.90 refers to the width at the rear, the widest part of the car. Tightening it by 0.12 it would no longer have the over mirror measurements, so I assume it has been widened in the racing version or in any case it is not exactly like in reality.
https://auto-specs.zercustoms.com/t/tvr/2003-tvr-tuscan-t440r-specifications.html
length 4367 mm / 171.9 in
width 1880 mm / 74.0 in
height 1210 mm / 47.6 in
No reference anywhere to the wheelbase spec but you assume it has to be longer and your picture previously mentioned is the only one that is quoting a wheel base.
Check this page if you haven't already, you can really see the difference in width from the photos between the earlier cars and the later ones.
https://archive.dailysportscar.com/subscribers/cars/tvrt400.htm
So it appears there are two versions raced.
How I checked your model size was in CM by making the inertia box fit the car:
INERTIA=1.990,1.2,4.435
My GTR2 model has the earlier width of 1.81m and wheelbase of 2.361 but it is a bit short, longer then 3.9 but around 4.1.
We can now assume that SimBin modelled their version off the earlier race car.
You could safely scale your model back a bit to the quoted 2003 spec.
As for tyre clipping the tarmac, getting the model size close to what is listed in tyres.ini solves this issue.
- 750
- Spain
- 2,189
- Helsinki
Yes, sometimes we are able to enjoy our cake without a food fight
- 46
- United Kingdom
I get this but I like to leave stuff like this to the people that are best at it... Could you create one pleaseThat's the great thing about AC! You can do it instead of waiting for someone else to fulfill your every need.
There's even tutorial videos to help you out and get you going!
AI Line Helper
Demo Video: AI Lines Extended Tutorial: Partial Side Lines Demo: Extended Tutorial Corrections/Additions/Clarifications 9:30 I should have said “I like the FX17 for recording side lines” 15:50 You don’t need to start recording a fast_lane...www.racedepartment.com
All I need is the a.i to be much faster around that 1 corner...
Last edited:
- 464
- Pizza
I was aware of the existence of multiple chassis but I thought that the differences were related to some differences in the bodywork and not on the chassis itself. If simbin modeled the 2004 t400r on the 2001 chassis, (if I'm not mistaken the one that was also called DeWalt car due to the iconic livery), the smaller one, then I understand why I didn't understand what was wrong with the measurements.
First of all, thank you for your patience and for giving me a hand.
The certain thing is that I can scale the model to fit the 2003 measurements, but I won't do it right away. Since this car is constantly evolving, I will downscale from 4.4m to 4.3m when I am sure I no longer have to touch either the 3D elements or the LODs.I believe that passions should unite people and not divide them.
- 82
- Öndörkhaan
- 493
- France
I might be quite late to the party, but is there a new version available/soon to be of the WSC legends pack ? I managed to get a few corrections for driver position/steer animation/materials that were wrong but can't change the wheel rotation speed for the corvette and the GT40 X1, becauuuuuse encryyyypt...
- 48
- Italy
Try it .. Thankyou !!
- 175
- Italy
- 566
- 127.0.0.1
It's the plan.
I've found someone to help me with the physics, so it should be
F1 2011 initial Release (or per cars physics? Depends on if the progress is too slow)
F1 2010 per car physics
F1 2008 per car physics and graphical fixes
FVA mod somewhere in between.
And somewhere after a BMW Sauber 2008 mod using a high quality blender model I've bought. (It'll be a huge pain in the ass to pull it off though)
- 130
- Blue New York
Yeah, it's v0.2. There's a config file on GitHub with GrassFX; I just put it in my track folder because I like to have everything self-contained. @twobegreen's great rotating windmill code and the RainFX code can be added to that.
- 1,250
- United States
Similar threads
