- 865

- 127.0.0.1
My two cents on this (because i'm not rich, I only have two cents to drop), is that you can enjoy him doing Lods because you actually need it. That's fine, but in the same time not think that what the dude do is morally okay and that it's people who actually did 90% of the work to ask that guy to do the 10% remaining.for you maybe, not for me, LODs are essential for me to be able to run races with several cars without performance problems, since simplygon was stop many modders haven't been looking for workarounds, but ACTK must have found one because he's still making them. Yes, I like his work because it's not just reuploading but optimizing and correcting minor bugs, but if creators were a little more careful, he wouldn't need to touch them. When I ask him for a correction, he does it without any problem, and I'm sure that if modders asked him for a correction, he'd do it out of pleasure.
I have contributed to other people cars, like for example Forbys sauber, I did a 3D modification, simple one. From shark fin to no shark fin version. It's a visible contribution, but just like 10%, instead of giving to him, and that he update the car to include my changes and everyone can enjoy the car from a single source.
Now this is what he doesn't do. Now you are kind of ****ting on the morality, fork the car and makes his own change, now you have two different source for the car, and if the original modder improve it then you won't have those changes on the other car, and so you end up with having two source for the car with different "improvements" instead of having one single car with all the improvements.
Who wins? not the original modder, not the community, just the ego of the guy that wanted clout