True, however it adds credibility to it's conviction, the equivalent of a Range Rover not being able to go offroad, most wouldn't notice but it's status would be harmed.Most people don't care whether their car is RWD or FWD. 80% of owners thought their 1-Series were FWD.
Most people don't care whether their car is RWD or FWD. 80% of owners thought their 1-Series were FWD.
How does the 320i not count?^ It's basically a BMW-speak for 4-door coupes. Here is my favorite by far:
-> But a 2-series Gran Coupe would be money for BMW.
^ This very car will give the A3/S3 and the CLA a run for its money! Since there are no true RWD entry level sedan, please the 320i (in North America) does not count. I can imagine the line up:
- 220i Gran Coupe
- 228i X-Drive Gran Coupe
- M235i Gran Coupe
- M2 Gran Coupe
only to later on...build a 4-door 4 Series that's just a little sharper looking than a 4-door 3 Series
That the 3GT and 4GC exist and differ in mere details always makes me laugh. The GT concept is appalling.
Compared to the A5 Sportback which really is just a four-door Coupe and its own sibling the 6GC, the 4er version is a poor wretch, neither sporting enough or luxurious in design.
Well, the GT is for a more usable boot, and more passenger space, and a 'semi-command' driving position... else the standard Touring model 3-er would probably suffice.A more useable boot is what the GT is for, no?
I'd agree with that to a point, like I said, I'd rather they'd have kept it as a 4-dr. They are basically a similar concept, but with emphasis on different areas, and given how the GT and GC concepts both came about and evolved, I think both are a logical, perhaps not ideal, conclusion. But, I'm not offended by the name or designation to be honest - to me it's the F36 anyway There's talk of combining the models for the Gxx 3/4-er. I don't really agree they should do that, but I'm curious to see if they did, how well it would be received, and if it would equal 3GT+4GC sales.There's nothing 'gran' about the looks of the 4GC. It's the sporting slant on the GT theme and little more. A gran coupe it is not.
After a lot of the backlash BMW got for the 5GT, I thought for sure BMW would drop the GT from there on. Was wrong.That the 3GT and 4GC exist and differ in mere details always makes me laugh. The GT concept is appalling. It's as daft as the Golf Plus.
Compared to the A5 Sportback which really is just a four-door Coupe and its own sibling the 6GC, the 4er version is a poor wretch, neither sporting enough or luxurious in design.
After a lot of the backlash BMW got for the 5GT, I thought for sure BMW would drop the GT from there on. Was wrong.
^ The 3er is a different class size (and under-equipped wise) compared to the A3/S3 & CLA sedans. The 320i is more of a base-level A4, C-class, IS, etc. competitor.How does the 320i not count?
^ But in all honesty, even with the social-climbing age of today, nobody wants a "bare-bones/underpowered" BMW 3-series. But a well-equipped 2-series is a better buy, price-wise.
Love the skewed respective of the American market.
Love the skewed perspective of the American market. 180 turbocharged horses is not underpowered by European standards lol.
I think that attitude may be true in the US, but probably isn't as true for the other 80% of BMW's market.
^ I agree on the skewed-ness of the North American market.More like the skewed perspective of the Jalopnik crowd. I don't think most American drivers even know what horsepower is let alone how many their Camry has.
180 HP is hardly even underpowered for a base 3-series to be honest.-> ...
^ The 3er is a different class size (and under-equipped wise) compared to the A3/S3 & CLA sedans. The 320i is more of a base-level A4, C-class, IS, etc. competitor.
-> Although the 320i is a very tempting buy. And it becomes sweeter when equipped with the "Jalopnik" spec package.
^ But in all honesty, even with the social-climbing age of today, nobody wants a "bare-bones/underpowered" BMW 3-series. But a well-equipped 2-series is a better buy, price-wise.
Considering that base USDM 3-series back in the day ranged from 98 HP to 141 HP, 180 is quite plenty.180HP is plenty of power for a compact sports saloon. The base 3-Series here (316i) has the three-cylinder turbo engine from the Mini Cooper.
"Spec-sheet car enthusiasts" exist?^ For the "spec-sheet car enthusiast", it is underpowered. But for a vehicle that is less than 3300 lbs, RWD, turbo torque, and 6MT is more than enough for the "joy-seeker car enthusiast" on which is I am.
-> Don't get me wrong, I like the 320i very much. I just voicing out the opinions of the would-be buyers.
Yeah, those who obsess over horsepower figures and such.
Honestly. You must be like 13 or 14.masturbate over horsepower figures and such.