BMW 2-Series & M2

^ It's basically a BMW-speak for 4-door coupes. Here is my favorite by far:

2014-BMW-M6-Gran-Coupe-rear-three-quarters-static.jpg


-> But a 2-series Gran Coupe would be money for BMW.

BMW-2-Series-GranCoupe-5%255B8%255D.jpg


^ This very car will give the A3/S3 and the CLA a run for its money! Since there are no true RWD entry level sedan, please the 320i (in North America) does not count. I can imagine the line up:

- 220i Gran Coupe
- 228i X-Drive Gran Coupe
- M235i Gran Coupe
- M2 Gran Coupe

:)
 
Most people don't care whether their car is RWD or FWD. 80% of owners thought their 1-Series were FWD.
 
Most people don't care whether their car is RWD or FWD. 80% of owners thought their 1-Series were FWD.
True, however it adds credibility to it's conviction, the equivalent of a Range Rover not being able to go offroad, most wouldn't notice but it's status would be harmed.
 
Most people don't care whether their car is RWD or FWD. 80% of owners thought their 1-Series were FWD.

It still matters though. That overly-simplified statistic doesn't remove the need to properly identify and act on product strengths and weaknesses, or brand strengths and weaknesses, though. Nor does it necessarily represent the current sub 3-series lineup these days.
 
^ It's basically a BMW-speak for 4-door coupes. Here is my favorite by far:

2014-BMW-M6-Gran-Coupe-rear-three-quarters-static.jpg


-> But a 2-series Gran Coupe would be money for BMW.

BMW-2-Series-GranCoupe-5%255B8%255D.jpg


^ This very car will give the A3/S3 and the CLA a run for its money! Since there are no true RWD entry level sedan, please the 320i (in North America) does not count. I can imagine the line up:

- 220i Gran Coupe
- 228i X-Drive Gran Coupe
- M235i Gran Coupe
- M2 Gran Coupe

:)
How does the 320i not count?
 
I want to say I don't really see the point of a 2 Series GranCoupe, but then again, this is the company that split the 3 Series family into 4 doors with the 4 Series being for 2 doors, only to later on...build a 4-door 4 Series that's just a little sharper looking than a 4-door 3 Series.

Love the company & their cars, but it's changed a lot in the last 20 years I've been around their cars.

The Vanishing Boy though, listing what is possibly the best looking BMW in the last several years with the i8 & actually made some sort of sense with getting the 4-door use of a M5 & the gorgeous looks of the M6. The rest of the GranCoupes don't really have that going for them with BMW sharing a similar design across the model range.
 
That the 3GT and 4GC exist and differ in mere details always makes me laugh. The GT concept is appalling. It's as daft as the Golf Plus.

Compared to the A5 Sportback which really is just a four-door Coupe and its own sibling the 6GC, the 4er version is a poor wretch, neither sporting enough or luxurious in design.
 
only to later on...build a 4-door 4 Series that's just a little sharper looking than a 4-door 3 Series

I know Americans and Europeans often view these things differently, but the there is no 4-door 4-er. Even if there was no other difference, in the 3-er Saloon and the 4-er Gran Coupe, the Gran Coupe offers a 5 door lift-back... this has been a popular practice (at least in Europe) for decades.

VXR
That the 3GT and 4GC exist and differ in mere details always makes me laugh. The GT concept is appalling.

I guess they are just "mere" details, but they add up to a different package. 3GT, compared to the 4GC; is longer, with longer wheelbase so much more space for passengers. It has a taller body, along with higher ride height which offers a more spacious cabin (i.e. more headroom and shoulder room) and a higher seating position. And it can swallow more luggage than any comparable seat configuration in the 4GC. I don't see how that makes it appalling? It makes it the most practical car in the 3/4 series family.

VXR
Compared to the A5 Sportback which really is just a four-door Coupe and its own sibling the 6GC, the 4er version is a poor wretch, neither sporting enough or luxurious in design.

The A5 Sportback is a 5 door lift-back, exactly the same as the 4GC. I'd be surprised if it manages to be more sporting than a 4GC, given its FWD basis... but I guess along with it's styling, that's open to some subjectivity.

I would have preferred to see BMW take the 4GC down the same route as the 6GC, and make it a true 4-door, but I guess they felt they could sell more if it had a more usable boot.
 
A more useable boot is what the GT is for, no? There's nothing 'gran' about the looks of the 4GC. It's the sporting slant on the GT theme and little more. A gran coupe it is not.
 
VXR
A more useable boot is what the GT is for, no?
Well, the GT is for a more usable boot, and more passenger space, and a 'semi-command' driving position... else the standard Touring model 3-er would probably suffice.

VXR
There's nothing 'gran' about the looks of the 4GC. It's the sporting slant on the GT theme and little more. A gran coupe it is not.
I'd agree with that to a point, like I said, I'd rather they'd have kept it as a 4-dr. They are basically a similar concept, but with emphasis on different areas, and given how the GT and GC concepts both came about and evolved, I think both are a logical, perhaps not ideal, conclusion. But, I'm not offended by the name or designation to be honest - to me it's the F36 anyway :D There's talk of combining the models for the Gxx 3/4-er. I don't really agree they should do that, but I'm curious to see if they did, how well it would be received, and if it would equal 3GT+4GC sales.

Anyhow... on the subject of the 2-er... all this talk of a Gran Coupe won't come to fruition until the next generation anyway, by which time, BMW's entire sub 3 series line-up will be undergoing quite a bit of re-jigging.
 
VXR
That the 3GT and 4GC exist and differ in mere details always makes me laugh. The GT concept is appalling. It's as daft as the Golf Plus.

Compared to the A5 Sportback which really is just a four-door Coupe and its own sibling the 6GC, the 4er version is a poor wretch, neither sporting enough or luxurious in design.
After a lot of the backlash BMW got for the 5GT, I thought for sure BMW would drop the GT from there on. Was wrong.
 
After a lot of the backlash BMW got for the 5GT, I thought for sure BMW would drop the GT from there on. Was wrong.

I think a fair chunk of the backlash came from the US, where the GT had been offered as a replacement for the F11 5-er Touring. With sales in the US not being what BMW hoped, it was lucky the GT found some popularity in other markets or else they might well have canned the idea.
 
Ford didn't need a bunch of extra names for the body styles on the Mondeo. 4-door, 5-door, wagon. The current 3/4-series lineup is utterly silly to people not well-versed in the church of BMW. The 4GC is barely different from the regular 3 sedan in all measurements, other than a ~50kg penalty. As someone pretty well-versed on minute detail changes, even I have a hard time telling a 4GC from a 3 unless I see the telltale vent behind the front wheels.

The 3GT, meanwhile, does offer more storage space than the regular sedan... which should be expected, since it's closer in size to a modern 528i than the "compact" 3-series. It also takes a significant thrashing with the ugly stick, so I'm not too surprised that it's been a rare sight on the roads of Toronto, whereas the Touring is doing pretty decently.

Perhaps calling the 4GC the four-door version of the two-door version of a four-door car is inaccurate, when in reality, it's little more than a hatch'd version of the normal-trunked four-door. All for only a few thousand dollars more...
 
-> ...
How does the 320i not count?
^ The 3er is a different class size (and under-equipped wise) compared to the A3/S3 & CLA sedans. The 320i is more of a base-level A4, C-class, IS, etc. competitor.

-> Although the 320i is a very tempting buy. And it becomes sweeter when equipped with the "Jalopnik" spec package.

18kbngcamd99rjpg.jpg


^ But in all honesty, even with the social-climbing age of today, nobody wants a "bare-bones/underpowered" BMW 3-series. But a well-equipped 2-series is a better buy, price-wise.
 
Love the skewed perspective of the American market. 180 turbocharged horses is not underpowered by European standards lol.
 
Last edited:
^ But in all honesty, even with the social-climbing age of today, nobody wants a "bare-bones/underpowered" BMW 3-series. But a well-equipped 2-series is a better buy, price-wise.

I think that attitude may be true in the US, but probably isn't as true for the other 80% of BMW's market.
 
VXR
Love the skewed respective of the American market.

More like the skewed perspective of the Jalopnik crowd. I don't think most American drivers even know what horsepower is let alone how many their Camry has.
 
I find the 120hp 1.6 in the Fiestas at work more than enough except for being a little slow off the line. That probably has more to do with the transmission being temperamental though.

But what do I know, I drive pick up.
 
-> ...
VXR
Love the skewed perspective of the American market. 180 turbocharged horses is not underpowered by European standards lol.

I think that attitude may be true in the US, but probably isn't as true for the other 80% of BMW's market.

More like the skewed perspective of the Jalopnik crowd. I don't think most American drivers even know what horsepower is let alone how many their Camry has.
^ I agree on the skewed-ness of the North American market. :indiff:

-> I was in Manila last April and it was not the case, the 1-series (one of my unicorn wants) is very prevalent over there. Although it was mostly the usual E87 118i and 120i, I've only seen the drool-worthy 130i once! :dopey:

-> As is in NA, the PI does not have much of a variety of models available as it does in Europe. But unlike in the NA, if you really want a M135i 3 [F21] or 5-door [F20]...BMW Philippines will gladly order one for you, tailor-made too! :(
 
-> ...

^ The 3er is a different class size (and under-equipped wise) compared to the A3/S3 & CLA sedans. The 320i is more of a base-level A4, C-class, IS, etc. competitor.

-> Although the 320i is a very tempting buy. And it becomes sweeter when equipped with the "Jalopnik" spec package.

18kbngcamd99rjpg.jpg


^ But in all honesty, even with the social-climbing age of today, nobody wants a "bare-bones/underpowered" BMW 3-series. But a well-equipped 2-series is a better buy, price-wise.
180 HP is hardly even underpowered for a base 3-series to be honest.
 
180HP is plenty of power for a compact sports saloon. The base 3-Series here (316i) has the three-cylinder turbo engine from the Mini Cooper. :boggled:
 
180HP is plenty of power for a compact sports saloon. The base 3-Series here (316i) has the three-cylinder turbo engine from the Mini Cooper. :boggled:
Considering that base USDM 3-series back in the day ranged from 98 HP to 141 HP, 180 is quite plenty.
 
^ For the "spec-sheet car enthusiast", it is underpowered. But for a vehicle that is less than 3300 lbs, RWD, turbo torque, and 6MT is more than enough for the "joy-seeker car enthusiast" on which is I am.

-> Don't get me wrong, I like the 320i very much. I just voicing out the opinions of the would-be buyers. ;)
 
^ For the "spec-sheet car enthusiast", it is underpowered. But for a vehicle that is less than 3300 lbs, RWD, turbo torque, and 6MT is more than enough for the "joy-seeker car enthusiast" on which is I am.

-> Don't get me wrong, I like the 320i very much. I just voicing out the opinions of the would-be buyers. ;)
"Spec-sheet car enthusiasts" exist?
 
Back