Boring Car Appreciation Thread

  • Thread starter Sage Ages
  • 339 comments
  • 43,836 views
19ctyhh14zftpjpg.jpg


Citroen M35 It's boring and angry at the same time but it has a wankel motor.
 
Mid 2000's Kias seem very cheap and boring looking. Nothing appealing about them at all.

Kia Spectra
image.jpeg

Kia Optima
image.jpeg
 
I'm not sure either of you have quite got the point of this thread. The idea here is the appreciation of boring cars - finding things to like about cars you normally wouldn't give a second glance.

It is neither a thread to list cars you simply dislike, nor a thread for obvious statements like "everyday cars are boring". We already know that. What we don't know is why you might like a particular "boring" car.
Mazda 6.
 
I guess it's time to post here probably and to start with:

Ford Crown Victoria

12445894_1717214805189348_937928334_n.jpg


The Crown Vic is a 4 door american car made by Ford. It's big, it's heavy and well...it's meh, nothing really fancy about it. But i like it...for it's simple look. It's doesn't look complicated-aggressive-weird styled car but rather looks simple in my eyes. Look at those front end and rear end...

12599385_941822759270585_297007932_n.jpg


it looks straight forward, it feels a bit generic and that's what i like about it. It's the first car i think of when i hear the word saloon or sedan. When i think of a taxi or a police car, i simply think of this between all the cars. I just like it.

Toyota Cressida

20160412_211742.jpg


Here's another car i like, the Toyota Cressida, except the fact i like this because of the term "Nostalgia" because the car your seeing above were used to be my mum's first and only car she ever drove on daily base's. To me, this is just an enlarged Toyota Corolla with rear wheel drive but i like it because it reminds me of my past, i like it beacuse it reminds of the fun times, i like it because i grew up with it.

20160412_211805.jpg


Sure it's not thrill to drive or beauty to look at or fast in any sort of way but it's the car i grew up with. It's the car where my mum used to take me to school and then back to home. It's the car where we used to go to a themepark and have fun with bumper cars and arcade machines. It's the car where at night went to a local fastfood restaurant and a family night. It's the car where we travelled across the boarders.

20160412_211838.jpg


Sure it has a basic interior but a simple stuff like the air conduction has a nostalgic feeling. I used to enjoy the feeling and the smell of a cold air throwing at us. I want to actually take this car back to my home and fix all the wrong bits which's alot and might as well use it as my first daily car.
 
Buick Regal GS Supercharged

upload_2016-11-20_21-35-41.png


Now here's a boring car that I appreciate; a car that I have a guilty pleasure for. The Buick Regal GS Supercharged, produced from 1997 to 2004. On the outside, it looks like the type of car your grandma might drive to church bingo, but I kind of like the exterior. Smooth, clean lines it has. The Regal GS is a car that is conservatively designed, uninterrupted by fancy paint schemes or body cladding, but looks decent at the same time. It's probably comfy, too, despite its faux-leather seats, common in GM cars marketed towards adults. If my parents bought me this as a first car, I actually wouldn't be too upset about it.



In terms of performance, the Regal GS is what I'd call a "minor-league sleeper". It's slightly faster than it appears, but its performance won't blow you away. Powered by a 3.8L Series II Supercharged V6, it makes a respectable 240 horsepower. Torque figures aren't too bad, either, at 280 lb-ft, and top speed is approximately 140 mph. 0-60 time is 6.4 seconds. Overall, performance is certainly not bad, especially for a front-wheel-drive American car. Other than the Regal GS, Buick did not offer any cars that possessed at least some sportiness during the late 90's and early 00's.



With some slight modifications, the Regal GS looks less grown-up looking.

As you may know, the Buick Regal has a large number of relatives. The Chevrolet Impala, Monte Carlo, Oldsmobile Intrigue, and Pontiac Grand Prix were built off the same platform as the Regal. Monte Carlo and Grand Prix, just like the regal, had performance versions. The Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS, and the Pontiac Grand Prix GTP, sported the same 3.8L supercharged V6, so performance were almost identical for trio. And they both appeared much "younger" than the Regal GS, having sportier styling, more color choices, body kits, and more. But, I'd choose the more ordinary looking Regal GS over them. By a lot.



upload_2016-11-20_22-13-45.png


Like I mentioned before, body cladding, bright colors, stripes, and higher spoilers are absent from the Regal GS. For the MC and the GTP, all of the above were available, and those cars weren't any faster than the Regal. But, faux sportiness like that is tacky in my book. The cladding, spoilers, and "go-faster" stripes and large SS decals featured on the MC just make the car uglier. It's like they are screaming, "look at me! I'm a sports car!", while the Regal is quiet. And in fact, the MC and GTP appears faster than they really are, while the Regal looks slower than it really is. At least that's what I think. Personally, I would want something subtle like the Regal, and not something too over-the-top like its siblings.


 
Last edited:
Buick Regal GS Supercharged

View attachment 608350


Now here's a boring car that I appreciate; a car that I have a guilty pleasure for. The Buick Regal GS Supercharged, produced from 1997 to 2004. On the outside, it looks like the type of car your grandma might drive to church bingo, but I kind of like the exterior. Smooth, clean lines it has. The Regal GS is a car that is conservatively designed, uninterrupted by fancy paint schemes or body cladding, but looks decent at the same time. It's probably comfy, too, despite its faux-leather seats, common in GM cars marketed towards adults. If my parents bought me this as a first car, I actually wouldn't be too upset about it.



In terms of performance, the Regal GS is what I'd call a "minor-league sleeper". It's slightly faster than it appears, but its performance won't blow you away. Powered by a 3.8L Series II Supercharged V6, it makes a respectable 240 horsepower. Torque figures aren't too bad, either, at 280 lb-ft, and top speed is approximately 140 mph. 0-60 time is 6.4 seconds. Overall, performance is certainly not bad, especially for a front-wheel-drive American car. Other than the Regal GS, Buick did not offer any cars that possessed at least some sportiness during the late 90's and early 00's.



With some slight modifications, the Regal GS looks less grown-up looking.

As you may know, the Buick Regal has a large number of relatives. The Chevrolet Impala, Monte Carlo, Oldsmobile Intrigue, and Pontiac Grand Prix were built off the same platform as the Regal. Monte Carlo and Grand Prix, just like the regal, had performance versions. The Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS, and the Pontiac Grand Prix GTP, sported the same 3.8L supercharged V6, so performance were almost identical for trio. And they both appeared much "younger" than the Regal GS, having sportier styling, more color choices, body kits, and more. But, I'd choose the more ordinary looking Regal GS over them. By a lot.



View attachment 608371

Like I mentioned before, body cladding, bright colors, stripes, and higher spoilers are absent from the Regal GS. For the MC and the GTP, all of the above were available, and those cars weren't any faster than the Regal. But, faux sportiness like that is tacky in my book. The cladding, spoilers, and "go-faster" stripes and large SS decals featured on the MC just make the car uglier. It's like they are screaming, "look at me! I'm a sports car!", while the Regal is quiet. And in fact, the MC and GTP appears faster than they really are, while the Regal looks slower than it really is. At least that's what I think. Personally, I would want something subtle like the Regal, and not something too over-the-top like its siblings.


Plus, you're more likely to find a Regal that's actually been given proper care and maintenance over Monte Carlos and Grand Prixs of that era that are usually driven into the ground with 300,000 miles on them. Shame the transmissions on these things were so weak (GM actually had to make a separate "heavy duty" variant just for the supercharged models, and even that wasn't enough), otherwise they're pretty decent all around. There's even somewhat of a following for the L67 as they can easily be upgraded to even more power with some simple mods, not to mention that they sound pretty nice with an exhaust and cam upgrade.
 
IMAG1878.jpg
My glorious beige people mover. By far the most boring car I have owned but I have grown to appreciate the comfort and reliability. As a work car that I put 2.5k miles a month on it has been awesome. Plus the v6 gets awesome highway mileage at 30mpg. coupled with the 18.5 gallon tank I regularly see 500+ miles before having to refuel.
 
Couple boring Toyotas I have a strange desire to own

Never cared for these but my dad bought one for my mom a while ago and I drove it a few times and really liked driving it. For the money can't beat it.
image.jpg


Early Camrys, not pictured but a first gen would also be nice. If I ever need a daily, it'll be a toss up between an ES300 and an XV10 Camry wagon. First car was a beige Camry sedan, was a good car.
image.jpg


I find this one actually pretty cool, but how about an AWD Camry with an available V6 mated to a 5 speed manual with a digital dash?
image.jpg


Also find this one cool, Corolla Alltrac wagon! Also a fan of the 4WD Tercels.
image.jpg


Another one I never cared for until I drove one, but for the value these are in my opinion some of the best SUVs you can buy, huge soft spot for 3rd gen 4Runners. Love the sport package they were available with. 4th gens got too soccer momish I think, although I have seen some really nicely modified ones, plus an available V8 is cool.
image.jpg
 
2004 Dodge Stratus R/T.

View attachment 610150

Dunno why I liked these. I always have had a soft spot for 2000's fake NASCAR "homoglation" specials for some reason and it bugs me.
The pre-facelift R/T (not pictured) resembles the Intrepid very much. I often confuse them for Intrepids when I see them on the road.
 
I'm quite a big fan of the crop of saloon / sedan variants of hatchbacks that many European manufacturers pumped out out in the 80s and 90s. Especially the Ford Orion.

IMG_0367.JPG


I have no idea why. I'd love to see an Escort RS Cosworth drivetrain shoehorned into one.
 
Like I mentioned before, body cladding, bright colors, stripes, and higher spoilers are absent from the Regal GS. For the MC and the GTP, all of the above were available, and those cars weren't any faster than the Regal. But, faux sportiness like that is tacky in my book.

Whether or not the image the Grand Prix presented for itself (especially if you got one of the limited edition versions covered in scoops and vents Pontiac kept cranking out) was justified by its overall performance, it is undoubtedly a sportier car than the Regal. I've driven all of the second generation W bodies in varying states of trim level and brand since they flooded high school and college parking lots at exactly the time I was attending, and the only one that drove more like a waterbed than the Regal was its twin brother the Century. The Impala was only marginally better (though I know cops got better ones so I'm guessing the SS might have been as well), but the Poncho and Intrigue were in another time zone from them no matter the trim.
 
Last edited:
Back