- 29,373
- Glasgow
- GTP_Mars
The dude's 96, i'm surprised he didn't do this years ago.
Yeh, just 4 more years and he'll get a telegram from the wife.
The dude's 96, i'm surprised he didn't do this years ago.
I wouldn't call it a hoax. A hoax would suggest that it was a deliberate attempt to deceive in such a way that the deception takes on a life of its own - for example, when British settlers discovered the platypus and sent a specimen back to Britain, zoologists were convinced that it was a fake given the apparent absurdity of the creature.Which was apparently a hoax?
No, this seems to have been more of a rumour that got out of control.
Hopefully the papers'll run a best of listing of his various pronouncements over the years. After he said "this electrical work is so bad it looks like it was put in by Indians" the PR person who spun it into "he meant to say cowboys instead" deserves an award.
Yeh, just 4 more years and he'll get a telegram from the wife.
It has, to this point, lost every single one declared so farUKIP has also lost many of its seats.
That 3 million popular vote is really justifying them now.
That 3 million popular vote is really justifying them now.
UKIP has, so far, taken one seat from Labour but lost every single one it has defended - totalling 130 seats lost.It has, to this point, lost every single one declared so far
Because it's a classic us versus them debate that is a great distraction.Why do MPs and political parties care so much about fox hunting when, as far as I can make out, no other bugger does?
But that's the thing. I've lived in places where town is on one side and country is on the other (still do) and no-one gives a crap about it.But the way it seems to seperate country folk from townies is the real kicker.
It wasn't a hot topic where I lived, but people did care. Certainly with the divide between Swansea and Gower, coastal towns and the valleys.But that's the thing. I've lived in places where town is on one side and country is on the other (still do) and no-one gives a crap about it.
It's like an entirely invented wedge... bring up fox-hunting and the poor/city-but-not-the-rich-bit-of-London are supposed to think "Bloody rich kids being cruel to animals because they inherited loads of land" and the rich/countrysiders are supposed to think "Bloody townies telling us how to live on the land when they don't even come here", but I don't get why anyone is supposed to think that when no-one actually cares.
It just doesn't make any actual sense. It's like banning gout.
And I guess that's part of the issue, it's an extremely targeted issue. There are plenty of aspects of animal cruelty that's embraced in British society like intensive farming, ritual slaughter and in-bred pets. But "townies" seem to not care about this whilst eating their barn-laid omelette with halal chicken whilst cuddling their semi-suffocating pug.LiquidI don't care about fox hunting as a self-contained spectacle but I care about animal cruelty which overlaps somewhat.