Britain - The Official Thread

  • Thread starter Ross
  • 13,359 comments
  • 616,678 views

How will you vote in the 2024 UK General Election?

  • Conservative Party

    Votes: 2 6.9%
  • Green Party

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Labour Party

    Votes: 14 48.3%
  • Liberal Democrats

    Votes: 2 6.9%
  • Other (Wales/Scotland/Northern Ireland)

    Votes: 1 3.4%
  • Other Independents

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other Parties

    Votes: 2 6.9%
  • Spoiled Ballot

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Will Not/Cannot Vote

    Votes: 8 27.6%

  • Total voters
    29
  • Poll closed .
Sorry for interrupting this global warming thread but the worst news.

Sunak Vs Truss. That means middle England racists will elect Truss. Who is the continuity candidate. Just as big a liar as Johnson.
This is actually good news as there's no way the Conservatives will win the next GE with Truss in.

.....But JFC, if her getting to this stage isn't a damning indictment of the current state of the party then I don't know what is
 
Last edited:
I don’t know where you are getting those numbers from
Official records.
a car thermometer
Im Out See Ya GIF by ADWEEK


Again, 40+ is normal summer highs for Italy and has been for over a century, but 1.5 degrees higher than the hottest temperature ever recorded in the UK before Tuesday. Our infrastructure is not designed for that temperature because it's never had to see anything close to that temperature.

Five days of 45-degree heat killed a thousand people in countries used to and designed for regular 40-degree heat. Why would you think 40-degree heat in a country used to and designed for regular 25-degree heat is not a concern?
 
Last edited:
Results from the fifth ballot in the Conservative leadership race:

Rishi Sunak - 137 (+19)
Liz Truss - 113 (+27)
Penny Mordaunt - 105 (+13)
____
Out after Round 5
Penny Mordaunt

Out after Round 4
Kemi Badenoch

Out after Round 3
Tom Tugendhat

Out after Round 2
Suella Braverman

Out after Round 1
Nadhim Zahawi
Jeremy Hunt


Staggeringly, Liz Truss is now odds-on favourite to win the Tory leadership race, despite not even managing to muster enough votes to automatically get her into the last two, even in a vote between three candidates. Incredible. An utter imbecile of a woman, she can't even muster the support of 1/3rd of MPs in her own party, and yet this useless, posing Thatcher-clone dolt of a human being is very likely going to be the next Prime Minister of the UK.

We. Are. ******.
It doesn't surprise me that Truss benefitted most from the void created by Badenoch's elimination. She [Badenoch] topped the polls on YouGov, ConservativeHome and the Telegraph; so there are a lot of disgruntled Conservative members and voters that never wanted to vote for either Truss or Sunak but have to choose between them because the MPs care more about who will give them a cushy job than what their base wants.

My MP (Michelle Donelan) at first backed Nadim Zahawi and then conducted an online poll, which only about 800 people responded to, but sill, she listened, and Penny Mourdant won it so she backed her. It's probably gonna go to Truss as Sunak is more of a known quantity and is always gonna have Partygate, tax avoidance, and his general association with BoJo hanging over his head, and a Thatcher tribute act will always go down well with older Tories.

Now is the time for Labour to pull themselves together and strike, because they've been given a nice big open goal for 2024.
 
Posting history is clearly readable, you have form.
Elaborate please, seriously. My posting history is more than anything characterized by helpful and readable contributions.
You've clearly never been, average annual humidity is 60%, not a huge difference to the averages of 70% for the UK and Italy. Dubai also hits its humidity peak in summer at 90%, with temps above 45 degrees.

Therefore you couldn't be more wrong in this regard.
I’ve never been what? 60% is not as uncomfortable as humidities above 75% are. That’s when you start hoping for a thunderstorm to roll by to clean out the air.
That would be the temps in Italy that you exaggerated and caused a number of deaths.
Excuse me? I didn’t exaggerate anything.
It's not scaremongering, people are literally dying as a result of it.
The media taking this as an opportunity to talk about climate change is scaremongering. It may be a real phenomenon but it’s no more relevant now than it was one week ago, or four months from now. The priority right now should be to give people advice on how to get through the hot weather, but a lot of attention is given to worried scientists and emergency services feeling the pressure. Unhelpful.
Characterising it as scaremongering is inherently unhelpful, and its a trait you have shown over a number of topics, to the degree that the person is the point.
No scaremongering is unhelpful. I don’t know how I can explain it better than I already have over several posts. Keep calm and take reasonable precautions applies in a lot of contexts. So address the point even when you don’t understand it.

Should I also start implying that there must be something wrong with you because we disagree? Not how discussion works if you’re serious about having one.

Im Out See Ya GIF by ADWEEK


Again, 40+ is normal summer highs for Italy and has been for over a century, but 1.5 degrees higher than the hottest temperature ever recorded in the UK before Tuesday. Our infrastructure is not designed for that temperature because it's never had to see anything close to that temperature.
Which I haven’t made any efforts to disprove. Still survivable with the right precautions though.
Five days of 45-degree heat killed a thousand people in countries used to and designed for regular 40-degree heat. Why would you think 40-degree heat in a country used to and designed for regular 25-degree heat is not a concern?
That is a concern and another discussion than what I’ve gotten into here. My original post was an attempt to remind people that there’s nothing to worry about as long as they drink properly and try to stay out of the sun during peak hours. For some reason people cannot seem to stand the fact that I’ve been through worse and made it out alive.
 
Elaborate please, seriously. My posting history is more than anything characterized by helpful and readable contributions.
It's been pointed out here and repeatedly in the Covid thread.
I’ve never been what? 60% is not as uncomfortable as humidities above 75% are. That’s when you start hoping for a thunderstorm to roll by to clean out the air.
To Dubai, the country you described as dry in terms of humidity, that hits 90% humidity in the middle of summer!
Excuse me? I didn’t exaggerate anything.
Yes you did. The temps you quoted for Italy were not accurate.

To try and pass car thermometer temps as equivalent to actual scientific data is bad faith to the extreme.

That you acknowledged it when pressed doesn't give you a pass on that either.



The media taking this as an opportunity to talk about climate change is scaremongering. It may be a real phenomenon but it’s no more relevant now than it was one week ago, or four months from now. The priority right now should be to give people advice on how to get through the hot weather, but a lot of attention is given to worried scientists and emergency services feeling the pressure. Unhelpful.
Not scaremongering no matter how much you try and claim it as such.
 
For some reason people cannot seem to stand the fact that I’ve been through worse and made it out alive.
... in a country designed for it, in an event which still killed people from the heat, and which wasn't a record for that location.

Our fridge wasn't holding below 10 degrees yesterday; it's supposed to have an internal temperature of four. There's nothing wrong with it, it's just not designed for a market where the external temperature hits 38 degrees and it couldn't exchange heat properly. At least it kept running - the supermarkets' freezers didn't.

Despite living 400 yards from the North Sea, the house was running at 28 degrees downstairs and 33 degrees upstairs (I dread to think what the loft was at) with an external temperature of 37. It wasn't even that sunny - as attested by the mere 21kW generated by the 30kW solar array we have; the heat was simply being captured by the house.

Opening windows was largely ineffective, as the external temperature was higher than the internal, so it was a case of strategic shade and airflow. It was very uncomfortable, especially for someone who needs a PC and an Xbox turned on to write about the FH5 Hot Wheels expansion yesterday.

The UK is simply not designed around having temperatures much above 32 degrees. We've never had temperatures above 40 (or indeed 39) until Tuesday. It wouldn't be a huge concern in Italy, but it is in the UK.


For reference, the difference in heat energy between 30 and 40 degrees is an entire order of magnitude. The UK is designed to run at heat energies one-tenth of those experienced on Tuesday.
 


I get the sense that GBN is a deeply unserious outlet.

Sadly you couldn't be further from the truth... they are deadly serious - they are not even capable of self-parody, they really are thicker than pig **** in the neck of a bottle.
 
Last edited:
It's been pointed out here and repeatedly in the Covid thread.
Which probably made up less than 0,1% of all my posts while I could still post in that bizarre thread. Disagreements related to COVID have no relevance to whatever point you’re trying to make here.

To Dubai, the country you described as dry in terms of humidity, that hits 90% humidity in the middle of summer!

I have not been to Dubai. You brought up Dubai, so feel free to share your experience if you have been there during 90% humidity.

Yes you did. The temps you quoted for Italy were not accurate.

To try and pass car thermometer temps as equivalent to actual scientific data is bad faith to the extreme.

They are pretty much accurate. Lombardy region apparently peaked at 44.1 C at July 21st 2006, which was around the time when I visited. So the car consistently reading daytime 45 C for a whole week straight is by no means an exaggeration. Don’t tell me you’re making a fuss over a difference of 1-2 degrees. Still hotter than UK in 2022.

That you acknowledged it when pressed doesn't give you a pass on that either.

Where did I acknowledge it? I don’t recall or see it reading previous comments.

Not scaremongering no matter how much you try and claim it as such.

In your opinion, which is just your opinion. Last night Sky News showcased a British newspaper with the headlines reading 40 C but with the numerals being on fire. Don’t tell me there’s no climate agenda behind presenting things in this ridiculous manner. There may very well be a connection to the climate, but inducing climate-related fear while people are actually dying from dehydration etc. is scaremongering. The newspaper would be better off depicting a water bottle if the media is serious about playing the helpful role you insist they are.

... in a country designed for it, in an event which still killed people from the heat, and which wasn't a record for that location.

None of which benefitted my holidays in Italy and Southern France at the time.

Our fridge wasn't holding below 10 degrees yesterday; it's supposed to have an internal temperature of four. There's nothing wrong with it, it's just not designed for a market where the external temperature hits 38 degrees and it couldn't exchange heat properly. At least it kept running - the supermarkets' freezers didn't.

Despite living 400 yards from the North Sea, the house was running at 28 degrees downstairs and 33 degrees upstairs (I dread to think what the loft was at) with an external temperature of 37. It wasn't even that sunny - as attested by the mere 21kW generated by the 30kW solar array we have; the heat was simply being captured by the house.

Opening windows was largely ineffective, as the external temperature was higher than the internal, so it was a case of strategic shade and airflow. It was very uncomfortable, especially for someone who needs a PC and an Xbox turned on to write about the FH5 Hot Wheels expansion yesterday.

The UK is simply not designed around having temperatures much above 32 degrees. We've never had temperatures above 40 (or indeed 39) until Tuesday. It wouldn't be a huge concern in Italy, but it is in the UK.

For reference, the difference in heat energy between 30 and 40 degrees is an entire order of magnitude. The UK is designed to run at heat energies one-tenth of those experienced on Tuesday.


Again, I haven’t been arguing that these heatwave-related challenges are negligible. Still, I bet you have had plenty of options to stay healthy despite of it all.

My own home has been dreadful today with “only” 35 C being recorded outside, but at least I’m not using lower temperatures to stress my point.
 
Last edited:
With the UK's temperature record jumping from 38.7°C to 40.3°C sees the UK jump ahead of these countries for hottest temperature recorded.

Belarus
Poland
Bhutan
Taiwan
Panama
Malaysia
Cuba


Wut
 
None of which benefitted my holidays in Italy and Southern France at the time.

Again, I haven’t been arguing that these heatwave-related challenges are negligible. Still, I bet you have had plenty of options to stay healthy despite of it all.

My own home has been dreadful today with “only” 35 C being recorded outside, but at least I’m not using lower temperatures to stress my point.
I... don't really know what your point even is at this juncture.

It should be plainly obvious that a nation whose houses and infrastructure are not designed to deal with temperatures in excess of 32C will experience major issues when temperatures exceed 40C and beat their own historic high by 1.5C.

It should be even more plainly obvious that when a nation whose houses and infrastructure are designed to deal with temperatures in excess of 40C - because it's been happening for at least a century - experiences deaths due to prolonged heat at 45C, there is clearly a survivability issue with those temperatures, whether you survived them or not:

Lombardy region apparently peaked at 44.1 C at July 21st 2006
Which was apparently not.


Yes, other places get higher temperatures. They've been doing so for a century and their countries are designed to operate at those temperatures. Ours doesn't, and isn't, so it's not really relevant. Blowing through our record, human history temperature by 1.5C is not something that's just easily brushed off -- if it had continued today, there'd be serious issues. Had it gone on for five days like the 2007 European Heatwave, we'd be looking at a few hundred dead.

As it is we're only getting a few houses burning down and a dozen or so kids dying in open water. But hey, 68 million survived it so no biggie.
 
I... don't really know what your point even is at this juncture.

My point is that Brits have nothing to fear at 40 degrees Celsius if they follow basic guidelines for hydration and sunlight shelter. I’ve been saying so based on my own experiences in worse conditions, but that is seemingly frowned upon for multiple reasons. You guys won’t hear any of it.

It should be plainly obvious that a nation whose houses and infrastructure are not designed to deal with temperatures in excess of 32C will experience major issues when temperatures exceed 40C and beat their own historic high by 1.5C.

Which I haven’t disagreed with.

It should be even more plainly obvious that when a nation whose houses and infrastructure are designed to deal with temperatures in excess of 40C - because it's been happening for at least a century - experiences deaths due to prolonged heat at 45C, there is clearly a survivability issue with those temperatures, whether you survived them or not:

Which was apparently not.

So you’re saying I probably only made it out alive from peak hour sunlight shelter and hydration because the car’s readings might had lied by 1-2 degrees?

Yes, other places get higher temperatures. They've been doing so for a century and their countries are designed to operate at those temperatures. Ours doesn't, and isn't, so it's not really relevant. Blowing through our record, human history temperature by 1.5C is not something that's just easily brushed off -- if it had continued today, there'd be serious issues. Had it gone on for five days like the 2007 European Heatwave, we'd be looking at a few hundred dead.

As it is we're only getting a few houses burning down and a dozen or so kids dying in open water. But hey, 68 million survived it so no biggie.

Stop acting like I’m downplaying the severity of it. You cannot highlight one sentence throughout this whole discussion where I’m doing so, unless you’re reading my posts like I’m being arrogant about the problem. I’m not.
 
Last edited:
British houses trap heat and retain it at night. Tents don't. A glass of water and a sunshade won't solve that problem.

It's a good thing I haven't experienced 43°C heat or I might have suffered permanent brain damage.
 
Last edited:
My point is that Brits have nothing to fear at 40 degrees Celsius if they follow basic guidelines for hydration and sunlight shelter. I’ve been saying so based on my own experiences in worse conditions, but that is seemingly frowned upon for multiple reasons. You guys won’t hear any of it.
I mean, yeah, if you entirely ignore the fact that all our infrastructure keels over in unprecedented heat levels it's not designed for, sure. No worries.
So you’re saying
Any sentence that starts out with this is almost certainly a fabricated resummarisation.

I'm not sure what "someone who once survived one week of daily 45 Celsius in Italy some 15 years ago" (wherein the word "Italy" was the only accurate one) has to gain from once again swerving the concept that the country that has experienced 40C+ temperatures just about every summer for a century is better prepared for 40C temperatures than a country in which it has literally never happened before Tuesday, and that it should be treated as an extreme weather event within that second country.
 
My point is that Brits have nothing to fear at 40 degrees Celsius if they follow basic guidelines for hydration and sunlight shelter. I’ve been saying so based on my own experiences in worse conditions
Blowing through our record, human history temperature by 1.5C is not something that's just easily brushed off -- if it had continued today, there'd be serious issues. Had it gone on for five days like the 2007 European Heatwave, we'd be looking at a few hundred dead.
The thing is, the whole "bunker down" mentality only works for a day, 2 days at most due to the inherent flaws of our infrastructure regarding heat. As Famine alluded to, heat build up simply doesn't dissipate quick enough once the temperature reaches the point that it did; Tuesday evening (when it peaked 40*C after a 24*C night), my downstairs rooms were already getting quite uncomfortable + that's with everything short of ice-fans employed to try and keep everything as cool as possible. That only took 36 hours.

Double that and everything indoors will eventually build up to a furnace, regardless of attempts to vent the house at night... and that's a semi-detached house with a garden to sleep outside in if the need arises. The poor sods occupying south-facing apartments/flats in urban centres don't have that luxury.

Point being; at present, a sustained heatwave over the 35* mark is genuinely lethal, factoring in the infrastructure and shock factor. Comparing Italy/Spain to the UK is like Apples and Oranges.
 
British houses trap heat and retain it at night. Tents don't. A glass of water and a sunshade won't solve that problem.

My home is no different. I don’t know if this piece of advice will also get deemed unacceptable, but make sure to keep windows open in opposing rooms if possible. It helps to flush out worst of the daytime heat. Small fans can also help accelerating the process.

I mean, yeah, if you entirely ignore the fact that all our infrastructure keels over in unprecedented heat levels it's not designed for, sure. No worries.


Ignore is a stretch but you come far by making sure to stock up on cold beverages and salty snacks. Last resort could be cold shower.

Any sentence that starts out with this is almost certainly a fabricated resummarisation.


It was a question.

I'm not sure what "someone who once survived one week of daily 45 Celsius in Italy some 15 years ago" (wherein the word "Italy" was the only accurate one) has to gain from once again swerving the concept that the country that has experienced 40C+ temperatures just about every summer for a century is better prepared for 40C temperatures than a country in which it has literally never happened before Tuesday, and that it should be treated as an extreme weather event within that second country.

Ok, I think I’ve done the best I can to explain why that is. Take it or leave it.

The thing is, the whole "bunker down" mentality only works for a day, 2 days at most due to the inherent flaws of our infrastructure regarding heat. As Famine alluded to, heat build up simply doesn't dissipate quick enough once the temperature reaches the point that it did; Tuesday evening (when it peaked 40*C after a 24*C night), my downstairs rooms were already getting quite uncomfortable + that's with everything short of ice-fans employed to try and keep everything as cool as possible. That only took 36 hours.

Double that and everything indoors will eventually build up to a furnace, regardless of attempts to vent the house at night... and that's a semi-detached house with a garden to sleep outside in if the need arises. The poor sods occupying south-facing apartments/flats in urban centres don't have that luxury.

Point being; at present, a sustained heatwave over the 35* mark is genuinely lethal, factoring in the infrastructure and shock factor. Comparing Italy/Spain to the UK is like Apples and Oranges.

Fair points regarding ongoing heat accumulation, but can we not agree that cool showers with regular intervals can prevent the onset of life-threatening conditions?

Also, I haven’t been comparing Southern European standards to UK standards. Keep in mind that the UK incident is not expected to be a prolonged heatwave, and my posts on this subject are nothing more than a sharing of thoughts on how to make it through the day.
 
Roo
I can, and I didn't need to leave your quoted post to do it:

Ok, take your precautions against the weather but also remember to be afraid. You like that better? I personally don’t as the very last thing someone needs during a heatwave is a stress-induced panic attack.
 
Last edited:
Ignore is a stretch
Nope, and you've done it again.

Stock up on cold beverages, eh? How are we planning on making them cold again? Was it in the refrigerators and freezers that are breaking down after literally one day of 40C, using electricity coming down wires that are sagging due to not being designed to operate in that envelope?

You are straight up ignoring the fact that the UK's housing and infrastructure is not designed to function at temperatures that high, but Italy's is. It's also not designed to operate below -12 - we don't even get winter fuel mixes for our cars...

Outside of -5 to 32, our **** breaks down.

It was a question.
It certainly had a question mark on the end of the fabricated resummarisation.
Ok, I think I’ve done the best I can to explain why that is. Take it or leave it.
You certainly haven't explained why you keep swerving the fact Italy's infrastructure is designed to operate within a temperature range it regularly experiences and which is higher than the range in which the UK's infrastructure is designed to operate and has never reached in its entire human recorded history.

The whole thing about you experiencing hotter raw air temperatures in Italy is just weird. I'm pretty sure I've experienced 40+ in Spain, Portugal, Italy and Cyprus - the last one was definitely 42 in Paphos and 41 in Limassol (according to a digital sign near the airport), and an average daytime high of 37 for the entire time we were there (according to a pinecone).

Turns out the infrastructure there is designed for that sort of thing. Who could have known?

Also Las Vegas, but you know... desert

I don’t know if this piece of advice will also get deemed unacceptable, but make sure to keep windows open in opposing rooms if possible. It helps to flush out worst of the daytime heat. Small fans can also help accelerating the process.
When external temperature exceeds internal temperature, opening any windows is not a great idea at all as you're just letting it equalise rather than cooling the house - and of course stillness is a characteristic of that sort of temperature in this sort of climate; even 400 yards from the sea we got very little wind - and a fan will just move the warm air around the room unless it is also cooled (or an "air-conditioner" as it's known).

A better bet is to put reflective material in the sun-facing windows and close the curtains to add a layer of insulation and keep heat out. Blast all the windows open at night to get rid of the trapped heat for sure; trapped heat at night means temperatures rise quicker when the sun's back out.
 
Last edited:
Ok, take your precautions against the weather but also remember to be afraid. You like that better? I personally don’t as the very last thing someone needs during a heatwave is a stress-induced panic attack.

The further this discussion goes, the more I get the impression you use the word "fear" as an attempt to gotcha people, so you can say later on "well, I never said you shouldn't be worried/uneasy/concerned/cautious/[insert thesaurus result here]". So:

Should British people be concerned or cautious about the effects of the heat?

Because if something isn't a concern, or requires caution, it's not something that requires precautions.

And since you brought up a specific medical condition (a "stress-induced panic attack"), I would suggest that anyone who stores temperature-sensitive medication in a fridge that can't cope with an ambient heat it wasn't designed for may well feel fear.

Edited to include caution, which is what I ment to type when I said concern, but left concern in as the question still stands.
 
Last edited:
Stock up on cold beverages, eh? How are we planning on making them cold again? Was it in the refrigerators and freezers that are breaking down after literally one day of 40C, using electricity coming down wires that are sagging due to not being designed to operate in that envelope?

You’ve already said that your fridge was working albeit with reduced performance. Better than nothing, and lukewarm drinks also work as hydration. Like I said, take a cool shower if all else fails, which is reliable “infrastructure” you still ignore the benefits of.

You are straight up ignoring the fact that the UK's housing and infrastructure is not designed to function at temperatures that high, but Italy's is. It's also not designed to operate below -12 - we don't even get winter fuel mixes for our cars...

Outside of -5 to 32, our **** breaks down.

Nope. You keep bringing up Italian housing and infrastructure, which I haven’t myself. For the 77th time, during my trip to Italy we found sunlight shelter under the tree next to our tent. Alternatively we went for long drives with the windows open, but the breeze was counterbalanced by sunbeams cooking the car’s interior (no air conditioning). The air was well above 40 C (45 C according to the car’s thermometer, which you consider laughable although official records come awfully close at 44 C) and humidity was definitely on the higher side. All our soft drinks were as hot as the air since we had no way to cool them down. The tent was literally an oven between sunrise and sunset. No immediate escape from the heat but we coped reasonably by sticking to the shadows and hydration. Surely you are better off in your unprepared British house.

I begin to come across like some grandad telling stories akin to “in my day we walked through lava streams just to reach school”, but inevitable considering how argumentative this pans out.

Also, like I’ve said multiples times now… I didn’t bring up this example to imply that you Brits are crying over nothing. I did it to calm down people’s concern for what could be an unprecedented exposure to hot weather for some, but it’s clearly an uphill battle when people for unfathomable reasons seem to prefer the exact opposite mental state.

It certainly had a question mark on the end of the fabricated resummarisation.

Question still stands unanswered. It’s a legitimate question, and insisting it’s something else just seems like an excuse to dodge it.

You certainly haven't explained why you keep swerving the fact Italy's infrastructure is designed to operate within a temperature range it regularly experiences and which is higher than the range in which the UK's infrastructure is designed to operate and has never reached in its entire human recorded history.

Because Italy’s infrastructure is irrelevant to the experiences I’ve had with heatwave in Italy. I’ve already said so

The whole thing about you experiencing hotter raw air temperatures in Italy is just weird. I'm pretty sure I've experienced 40+ in Spain, Portugal, Italy and Cyprus - the last one was definitely 42 in Paphos and 41 in Limassol (according to a digital sign near the airport), and an average daytime high of 37 for the entire time we were there (according to a pinecone).

Turns out the infrastructure there is designed for that sort of thing. Who could have known?

Amazing you have faith in a pinecone when a car thermometer is considered too shady. However, good for you if your holidays have benefitted from local countermeasures. Mine haven’t.

When external temperature exceeds internal temperature, opening any windows is not a great idea at all as you're just letting it equalise rather than cooling the house - and of course stillness is a characteristic of that sort of temperature in this sort of climate; even 400 yards from the sea we got very little wind - and a fan will just move the warm air around the room unless it is also cooled (or an "air-conditioner" as it's known).

You’re talking daytime. The advice I offered was referring to nighttime, like the comment I was replying to.

A better bet is to put reflective material in the sun-facing windows and close the curtains to add a layer of insulation and keep heat out. Blast all the windows open at night to get rid of the trapped heat for sure; trapped heat at night means temperatures rise quicker when the sun's back out.

True.

Roo
The further this discussion goes, the more I get the impression you use the word "fear" as an attempt to gotcha people, so you can say later on "well, I never said you shouldn't be worried/uneasy/concerned/cautious/[insert thesaurus result here]". So:

:odd:

You’re overthinking it.

Roo
Should British people be concerned or cautious about the effects of the heat?

Because if something isn't a concern, or requires caution, it's not something that requires precautions.

You can take precautions without being concerned. Caution? Absolutely, but that’s not necessarily concern.

Roo
And since you brought up a specific medical condition (a "stress-induced panic attack"), I would suggest that anyone who stores temperature-sensitive medication in a fridge that can't cope with an ambient heat it wasn't designed for may well feel fear.

I haven’t said people don’t fear the heat. I’ve said people are better off staying calm if they can, but that doesn’t mean going careless.
 
Last edited:
Alternatively we went for long drives with the windows open, but the breeze was counterbalanced by sunbeams cooking the car’s interior (no air conditioning).
Hang on a minute, i thought earlier in the thread you were telling people that their attitudes/habits towards climate change need to change to truly tackle it. Yet here you are telling us that you took long drives to cool down. That doesn't seem to me like sound advice.
 
Which probably made up less than 0,1% of all my posts while I could still post in that bizarre thread. Disagreements related to COVID have no relevance to whatever point you’re trying to make here.
They do, as it highlights your pattern of posting inaccurate and/or misleading anecdotal claims as if they were fact, and when they are demonstrated (using sourced data) to be wrong you do nothing but double down on it.

I will however leave that to other members to verify for themselves.
I have not been to Dubai. You brought up Dubai, so feel free to share your experience if you have been there during 90% humidity.
You claimed that Dubai wasn't comparable as it was a dry climate ("Dubai is coincidentally one of the less humid places"), quite how you came to that conclusion I neither know nor care, it is factually wrong.
They are pretty much accurate. Lombardy region apparently peaked at 44.1 C at July 21st 2006, which was around the time when I visited. So the car consistently reading daytime 45 C for a whole week straight is by no means an exaggeration. Don’t tell me you’re making a fuss over a difference of 1-2 degrees. Still hotter than UK in 2022.
Your actual claim was "As someone who once survived one week of daily 45 Celsius in Italy", the reality was 44.1 for 1 day, your anecdotal claim was wrong on both max temp and duration, yet you continued to double down on it, hell you still are!

Don't act shocked that people don't treat you as an honest broker, the evidence for why is right in your own posts.

My home is no different. I don’t know if this piece of advice will also get deemed unacceptable, but make sure to keep windows open in opposing rooms if possible. It helps to flush out worst of the daytime heat. Small fans can also help accelerating the process.
Your piece of advice would kill people.

The old and young struggle more than healthy adults (and arguably healthy adults is a narrow band) to regulate body temperature, and babies under three moths old can't do it period. Anyone following your advice would have just raise the internal temp of their house to match the external one, 40 degrees and babies under 12 weeks is a match made in dying.


Also, I haven’t been comparing Southern European standards to UK standards. Keep in mind that the UK incident is not expected to be a prolonged heatwave, and my posts on this subject are nothing more than a sharing of thoughts on how to make it through the day.
It's not a prolonged heatwave this time, do you think this is a one off, that next time it couldn't be longer and/or hotter?

In two days, as has been pointed out and pretty much handwaved away by yourself, the UK saw emergency services stretched with medical and fire related incidents (45 wildfires in my home county alone - which normally would not get that many all summer) caused by the heatwave, roads and airport runways taken out of operation (good luck going for a nice drive to cool down if the roads are closed - 42 did in my home county), rail lines buckled, perishable goods going off as shops refrigeration and freezer units fail, etc.

Allow me to add to that last one and build upon @Famine point about home fridges, my wife is type 1 diabetic and fridge's not operating at correct temps can have a significant impact on the safe storage of insulin, we are fortunate that having travelled to a number of hot countries we know how to cope with this via he use of additional cooling bags specifically designed for the purpose. That however is not the worse of it, pretty much all insulin has a max temp of 37 degrees, above that it is ineffective. The UK hitting 40+ meant that any type 1 diabetic out in the open, who wasn't using additional precautions (and most will not because this is not normal for the UK) is trying to use insulin that is now doing nadda, now staying indoors would work, unless they follow the asinine advise to open windows and raise the internal temp to match the external temp, and bye-bye goes the insulins effectiveness. However what this effectively meant was that in order to stay safe my wife was housebound for the duration of the heatwave, and it wouldn't matter how much shade or water she drank when outside.
 
Last edited:
I do feel for you all in Europe suffering from the heatwave. Those of us in the west of North America suffered our very own heatwave last year, the first heatwave that I experienced in my short 25 years of life. It's not difficult to understand how shortsighted - no matter how heartfelt they are - advice like "drink water" and "stay in the shade" are. It wasn't just a matter of finding a spot to cool down or buying some cold soda to drink, it was about adapting to a completely new scenario that folks around here have never experienced before. For those of us who suffered more from the heat, it was vital that we were able to get comfortable, just so that we could at least keep doing our day-to-day. Menial things that you would not normally second guess, like work or cooking or even sleeping, became increasingly difficult to do in the heat. In Vancouver, where I live, air conditioning units in most homes just aren't a thing, because temperatures are typically very mild. You'd normally be able to count the amount of hot days in a year with your fingers. People just never expected it, and the one time it happened, air conditioning units were out of stock as far as the eye could see and, more to the point, people were suffering left and right.

I'm lucky in that I'm young and relatively healthy, so it was certainly easy for me to move about and find places that were a bit more tolerable to pass the time, but even then I could see how it affected everyone else. My dad is a bit older and wasn't able to cook lunch or dinner in the heat, and opted to eat out those days instead. But at least he had the ability to do so. It's a small inconvenience for us but for others, I can imagine them not having that option and suffering as a result. These are all observations from my own perspective of the heatwave as well. There are plenty of news articles out there if you want any readings on the other detrimental effects of an unprecedented heat wave on an unsuspecting and unprepared city (and it's Vancouver for god's sake!), and none of them are fun for sure.
 
Last edited:
You’ve already said that your fridge was working albeit with reduced performance. Better than nothing
... which is what other people had. I already linked you to the article about the fridges and freezers in local supermarkets all breaking down...
You keep bringing up Italian housing and infrastructure, which I haven’t myself. For the 77th time, during my trip to Italy
Yes, amazing, you had a trip to Italy and used zero Italian infrastructure... somehow.
we went for long drives
Oh snap.
Question still stands unanswered. It’s a legitimate question, and insisting it’s something else just seems like an excuse to dodge it.
Cool. No I'm not "saying that" whatever it was you rephrased it as, because otherwise I would have actually said that.

What I'm pointing out is you said you survived 45+ for a week in Italy but the reality was a peak of 44 on one day. At best you were exaggerating for effect.

Amazing you have faith in a pinecone when a car thermometer is considered too shady.
That's literally the joke - the joke being that unreliable data sources are perfectly fine for you if they present the data you want them to present.

In fact the "digital sign near the airport" was the joke, the pinecone was the joke being repeated but much more obviously, given that pinecones are primarily used to observe humidity rather temperature. It was also a neat dovetail with the fact that the hottest place I recall in Cyprus was Mount Olympus, and it's covered with black pine trees.

However, good for you if your holidays have benefitted from local countermeasures. Mine haven’t.
Yes, amazing, you had a trip to Italy and used zero Italian infrastructure... somehow.
we went for long drives
Oh snap.


It's extraordinary how hard you're trying to not get this. You went to a place that was hotter than the temperatures the UK experienced this week; congratulations, you're not the only person who's ever done that.

The place(s) you went regularly experience(s) these temperatures, and everything in the country is designed to cope with those temperatures as a result. When they reach those temperatures, everything continues working.

The UK has never experienced the temperatures that it experienced this week and (almost) nothing in the country is designed to cope with those temperatures - or indeed anything close to them. When we reach those unprecedented temperatures, even though they are lower than the temperatures you experienced in the place designed around those temperatures, lots of things stop working.

That includes roads (which melt), bridges (which buckle because they can't expand as expansion gaps aren't designed that large) electricity (the overhead lines expand, droop, and break), utilities (the pipes melt and fail, or expand and fail, or don't fail but introduce points of failure due to fatigue and fail later), appliances (which burn out trying to give heat to an already-hotter environment), buildings (high-steel buildings expand, introducing points of failure), homes (which overheat) and even fields which spontaneously combust (or, more likely, ignite due to carelessness from smokers).

It overwhelms our fire services and our healthcare system - which is already having a bit of a tizz because of the latest burst of "Omicron+" COVID and which isn't set up for large numbers of hyperthermic people because we live on a damp rock - and our police service too as they respond to every other emergency.

40 degrees is nothing in Italy. It's a never-before-seen event which affects national infrastructure and causes emergencies at cumulative "major incident" levels in the UK. Here it's something of great concern, and we surprisingly came through it pretty well - but then it was only 36 hours of it. If we had to put up with a week of it, which regularly happens in Italy, it might be a lot more difficult. And we won't have weatherised for next time when it comes, because it's less expensive to clean up after a once-in-two-decades event than it is to make everything so it's better at coping with something that happens only every 20 (give or take) years.


I was fine though. All my stuff kept working - even if the fridge was struggling and the milk went off - and I went down the beach.
 
They do, as it highlights your pattern of posting inaccurate and/or misleading anecdotal claims as if they were fact, and when they are demonstrated (using sourced data) to be wrong you do nothing but double down on it.
What pattern? What inaccurate and misleading anecdotal claims? You’re throwing around some incredibly wild accusations.
I will however leave that to other members to verify for themselves.
Because you cannot verify it yourself?
You claimed that Dubai wasn't comparable as it was a dry climate ("Dubai is coincidentally one of the less humid places"), quite how you came to that conclusion I neither know nor care, it is factually wrong.
Quick Google search:
Dubai's average humidity is around 60%. For the most part, it is a more manageable humidity year-round than say living in Singapore or any of the tropicals of south-east Asia.
Singapore… Right next to Malaysia which I brought up, leading you to start talking about India instead, which is a country complicated by other factors. Another quick Google search. Compare this to Dubai:
Malaysia is a hot and humid climatic country with high average outdoor temperature of 23.70C - 31.30C and average humidity of 75% RH - 95% RH throughout a day.

Temperatures in Dubai may go higher, but the differences in average humidity between Malaysia and Dubai more or less balance things out I’d say.

Your actual claim was "As someone who once survived one week of daily 45 Celsius in Italy", the reality was 44.1 for 3 days, you anecdotal claim was wrong on both max temp and duration, yet you continued to double down on it, hell you still are!
45 C according to the car termometer I was relying on. News to me that we cannot trust thermometers, which is a claim you haven’t backed up with anything. That official records measured slightly less is unimportant to the point I was making comparing my experience to the UK, which didn’t go much above 40 degrees.
Don't act shocked that people don't treat you as an honest broker, the evidence for why is right in your own posts.
My original post was misunderstood. Not treated as dishonest. People generally treat me fine.
Your piece of advice would kill people.
Wrong. You are doing your health a disservice if you do not flush out the heat at night. Without air condition it’s an effective way to make a room suitable for sleeping.
The old and young struggle more than healthy adults (and arguably healthy adults is a narrow band) to regulate body temperature, and babies under three moths old can't do it period. Anyone following your advice would have just raise the internal temp of their house to match the external one, 40 degrees and babies under 12 weeks is a match made in dying.
I didn’t say you should open your windows during daytime in a heatwave. You just assume I was. Read it again and you’ll see I was replying to someone talking about cooling down rooms at night.
It's not a prolonged heatwave this time, do you think this is a one off, that next time it couldn't be longer and/or hotter?
I have no idea. Do you?
In two days, as has been pointed out and pretty much handwaved away by yourself, the UK saw emergency services stretched with medical and fire related incidents (45 wildfires in my home county alone - which normally would not get that many all summer) caused by the heatwave, roads and airport runways taken out of operation (good luck going for a nice drive to cool down if the roads are closed - 42 did in my home county), rail lines buckled, perishable goods going off as shops refrigeration and freezer units fail, etc.
Please do point out where I “handwaved” these issues away. Another unfounded accusation.
Allow me to add to that last one and build upon @Famine point about home fridges, my wife is type 1 diabetic and fridge's not operating at correct temps can have a significant impact on the safe storage of insulin, we are fortunate that having travelled to a number of hot countries we know how to cope with this via he use of additional cooling bags specifically designed for the purpose. That however is not the worse of it, pretty much all insulin has a max temp of 37 degrees, above that it is ineffective. The UK hitting 40+ meant that any type 1 diabetic out in the open, who wasn't using additional precautions (and most will not because this is not normal for the UK) is trying to use insulin that is now doing nadda, now staying indoors would work, unless they follow the asinine advise to open windows and raise the internal temp to match the external temp, and bye-bye goes the insulins effectiveness. However what this effectively meant was that in order to stay safe my wife was housebound for the duration of the heatwave, and it wouldn't matter how much shade or water she drank when outside.
That’s unfortunate and I haven’t suggested otherwise.

... which is what other people had. I already linked you to the article about the fridges and freezers in local supermarkets all breaking down...

Which has no bearing on people’s ability to cool drinks at home.

Yes, amazing, you had a trip to Italy and used zero Italian infrastructure... somehow.

That’s how camping with a tent tends to work.

:confused:

Cool. No I'm not "saying that" whatever it was you rephrased it as, because otherwise I would have actually said that.

Still not an answer to the question.

What I'm pointing out is you said you survived 45+ for a week in Italy but the reality was a peak of 44 on one day. At best you were exaggerating for effect.

I wasn’t exaggerating for effect. I relied on the reading provided by the car we drove. That the actual temperature then might not have reached 45 C in official records is largely irrelevant to the point. Any temperature between 40 C and 45 C is a struggle. I’d understand your concern if I was off by 10 degrees, because then I wouldn’t have been close to having experienced what the UK just did.

That's literally the joke - the joke being that unreliable data sources are perfectly fine for you if they present the data you want them to present.

I have had nothing but reliable experiences with car thermometers. Misreadings of one or two degrees aren’t overly decisive, unless you’re near 0 C.

In fact the "digital sign near the airport" was the joke, the pinecone was the joke being repeated but much more obviously, given that pinecones are primarily used to observe humidity rather temperature. It was also a neat dovetail with the fact that the hottest place I recall in Cyprus was Mount Olympus, and it's covered with black pine trees.

I know what the jokes are. I’m not laughing though.

In It's extraordinary how hard you're trying to not get this. You went to a place that was hotter than the temperatures the UK experienced this week; congratulations, you're not the only person who's ever done that.

That’s not the point, as I’ve stressed repeatedly. Point was that I survived hotter weather by sticking to shadows and hydration, meaning it’s possible to cope in less hot weather doing the same. At least you had access to the struggling fridge in your home.

The place(s) you went regularly experience(s) these temperatures, and everything in the country is designed to cope with those temperatures as a result. When they reach those temperatures, everything continues working.

The UK has never experienced the temperatures that it experienced this week and (almost) nothing in the country is designed to cope with those temperatures - or indeed anything close to them. When we reach those unprecedented temperatures, even though they are lower than the temperatures you experienced in the place designed around those temperatures, lots of things stop working.

That includes roads (which melt), bridges (which buckle because they can't expand as expansion gaps aren't designed that large) electricity (the overhead lines expand, droop, and break), utilities (the pipes melt and fail, or expand and fail, or don't fail but introduce points of failure due to fatigue and fail later), appliances (which burn out trying to give heat to an already-hotter environment), buildings (high-steel buildings expand, introducing points of failure), homes (which overheat) and even fields which spontaneously combust (or, more likely, ignite due to carelessness from smokers).

It overwhelms our fire services and our healthcare system - which is already having a bit of a tizz because of the latest burst of "Omicron+" COVID and which isn't set up for large numbers of hyperthermic people because we live on a damp rock - and our police service too as they respond to every other emergency.

None of which I deny by reiterating the importance of shadows and hydration.

40 degrees is nothing in Italy.

40 degrees is a challenge when you as a tourist doesn’t benefit from Italian standards, not to mention the shock it provides to the system when you come from a country where the summers tend not to go much higher that 25 C during the warmer days. This is why my experience offers a valid perspective in relation to what Britain went through. Take it or leave it.

It's a never-before-seen event which affects national infrastructure and causes emergencies at cumulative "major incident" levels in the UK. Here it's something of great concern, and we surprisingly came through it pretty well - but then it was only 36 hours of it. If we had to put up with a week of it, which regularly happens in Italy, it might be a lot more difficult. And we won't have weatherised for next time when it comes, because it's less expensive to clean up after a once-in-two-decades event than it is to make everything so it's better at coping with something that happens only every 20 (give or take) years.

I cannot say I’m surprised that you came through it pretty well. It’s what I was basically saying from the beginning when others low key freaked over the fear generated by the media (as always). Broken record here, sunlight shelter and hydration gets you quite far. Though, I have no right to say so because Italian holiday.

I was fine though. All my stuff kept working - even if the fridge was struggling and the milk went off - and I went down the beach.

I personally stay away from the beach on hot days as it’s full of reflective heat and light. Up to 10-15 kilometres inland you still get to enjoy the benefit of the coastal environment. To each his own.
 
Last edited:
Quick Google search:

Singapore… Right next to Malaysia which I brought up, leading you to start talking about India instead, which is a country complicated by other factors. Another quick Google search. Compare this to Dubai:


Temperatures in Dubai may go higher, but the differences in average humidity between Malaysia and Dubai more or less balance things out I’d say.
It's average is 60%, as I have already posted, however it's humidity highs are in mid-summer and regularly reach 90%, which I have also already posted. That is not a dry climate, or even one that is comparatively dry, which was the claim you made, "Dubai is coincidentally one of the less humid places".

It's almost like you didn't bother reading it.
45 C according to the car termometer I was relying on. News to me that we cannot trust thermometers, which is a claim you haven’t backed up with anything. That official records measured slightly less is unimportant to the point I was making comparing my experience to the UK, which didn’t go much above 40 degrees.
You actually need someone to tell you that a device designed for convenience in a car shouldn't be used as a direct comparison to scientific instrumentation?

OK, for those that need it. You can't trust the external temp a car tells you to be as accurate as a scientific instrument used to obtain meteorological data, they typically in summer overread by between 3 and 6 degrees Celsius.


I've also now lost count of the number of times the difference in infrastructure has been explains and ignored by you, and yes you will have used it regardless of if you slept in a tent or not. If you visited a town, village or city, if you drove on roads, went into a public building, shop or other structure you experienced it. It would be literally impossible to have travelled in the country without experiencing it.


My original post was misunderstood. Not treated as dishonest. People generally treat me fine.
How's that going in this thread so far?
Wrong. You are doing your health a disservice if you do not flush out the heat at night. Without air condition it’s an effective way to make a room suitable for sleeping.

I didn’t say you should open your windows during daytime in a heatwave. You just assume I was. Read it again and you’ll see I was replying to someone talking about cooling down rooms at night.
You need to work on your wording then.
I have no idea. Do you?
Yes, as we have a pattern showing that they will increase in both duration and intensity.

Please do point out where I “handwaved” these issues away. Another unfounded accusation.
Cold drinks and stay in the shade, anything more is just the media being overly dramatic.

I'm paraphrasing, but this is basically a re-run of your bad-advice and scientific illiteracy from the Covid thread

That’s unfortunate and I haven’t suggested otherwise.
Cold drinks and stay in the shade, anything more is just the media being overly dramatic.

I'm paraphrasing, but this is basically a re-run of your bad-advice and scientific illiteracy from the Covid thread
 
Last edited:
Back