- 29,387
- Glasgow
- GTP_Mars
And Milton Keynes is bang on.
Look at the shape of the map.I don't get it.![]()
I suppose crown jewels can be considered "Hidden Gems".
I don't get it.![]()
I hope everyone can see this; if not I'll try to find another link.
A man notices that the operator of a marked speed detection vehicle is actually a civilian. What happened next was amazing, earn $8000 a minute from home, find out the 8 foods that make you into Brad Pitt, etc, etc.
In seriousness there's a real issue here. Fortunately the male officer seems to realise when enough is enough. The female officer looks a right cow![]()
He will enter the UKIP hustings in order to get the chance to stand as his party's candidate for South Thanet.Farridge announces that he will stand as his party's candidate for South Thanet (damnit, Thanet, I love you...).
Here's the link to show that he's no joker.
I hope everyone can see this; if not I'll try to find another link.
A man notices that the operator of a marked speed detection vehicle is actually a civilian. What happened next was amazing, earn $8000 a minute from home, find out the 8 foods that make you into Brad Pitt, etc, etc.
In seriousness there's a real issue here. Fortunately the male officer seems to realise when enough is enough. The female officer looks a right cow![]()
The only issues here are:
- A van with police badges with a civilian inside (not an issue of him operating the camera)
- The woman police officer entering premise without permission, warrant, or reasonable suspicion that a crime is about to be committed.
When they deem you to be committing a crime, ( speeding ), they then procure evidence, ( press capture on the speeding camera ). Only trained police personnel have the training to gather evidence regarding a suspected crime, and not a civilian member of police staff.
How true is this? And how true is it that a civilian is allowed to operate a police vehicle, particularly a marked one, without an officer?
Oh. And PINAC. I'm glad he did this, it's good to see the police in action and / or call their methods into question. We shouldn't bend to the will of the police, particularly if they are overstepping their boundaries. Looking forward to hearing about the outcome of it.
It seems that UK law has changed fairly recently to allow certain circumstances where a police officer's role in capturing evidence is diminished and a "trained support worker" is allowed to take over. I'm still looking into that but if it wasn't legal for a CO to use the equipment then surely that would have been challenged hundreds of times already?
Assuming everything is above board, why didn't the van man say "Actually, sir, I am a trained support worker and have the right and jurisdiction to operate this vehicle and its equipment" or words to that effect? He looked like he'd been completely rumbled and backed into a corner with no way out.
That slapping sound that you hear is 24 million people facepalming.@prisonermonkeys, if you'd wondered where Big Tony was over the last few days... he's been in London talking about Scottish Independence.
What's his issue with the female policeperson, okay she put a foot in the door, or else he'd have shut it, and then in order to simply have a quick word to try and discourage the man from doing it again, they have had to go get a warrant, or arrest him?? talk about wasting police time!!
Also, if you get done speeding, just take it like a man, you broke the law, don't try and get off on a technicality.
Given that you're also happy to allow unwarranted property entry presumably it'll be okay when the system's will have eroded away to the point where Neighbourhood Watch are allowed to search your house while you're at work?
You don't enter someone's property a little bit, you enter it or you don't. They had no reason to enter his property but she made a strong token point of putting her foot over the threshold. And guess what, if an officer wants to speak to you and they're outside your property and they're in it... you don't have to.
Have and did.
You seem to think that it's okay have policing undertaken by unwarranted civilian personnel. They don't carry notebooks, warrant cards, have no evidential or arrest powers outside those very limited ones available to any general member of the public. It's also okay for them to represent the person of an officer parked on a public highway. It's also okay for them to undertake those actions without their epaulette displayed. And to give criminal evidence against fellow members of the public. That last is a big distinction.
Given that you're also happy to allow unwarranted property entry presumably it'll be okay when the system's will have eroded away to the point where Neighbourhood Watch are allowed to search your house while you're at work?
Legally there's no difference. And as an officer of the law she should know full well what she is and isn't allowed to do, and thus she willingly broke the law.Yes you do enter a little bit, a foot in the door isn't the same as letting yourself in and taking a poo on someones bed, he reacted as though it was the latter... I'm sure he'd have rather been arrested so he could bitch about that on facebook too.
Legally there's no difference. And as an officer of the law she should know full well what she is and isn't allowed to do, and thus she willingly broke the law.