Great if it’s really gonna sound like that. I didn’t mean to prefer the Tourbillon with a screaming sound with my previous post, I just wanted it to be higher-pitched than the deep bellow of the Veyron/Chiron.That is more than likely how it will sound. Catchpole's video compares the 3 Cosworth built engines between Aston Martin, Gordan Murray, & Bugatti, and the Bugatti does not have that loud pitch of the others. In fact, it has the toned down grunt Bugatti's W16 made.
I would imagine this is a purposely made decision given the intended use of the Bugatti & its clientele versus that of the Valkyrie & the T.50.
I can be translated as both, but I've more commonly seen it used for water than air, and it's funnier anyway."Whirlwind" is a closer translation I think
I think you might not be disappointed. It will be less coarse than the outgoing W16, but far from the wail of the equal-length 6-into-1 exhausts on the V12s you mention.Great if it’s really gonna sound like that. I didn’t mean to prefer the Tourbillon with a screaming sound with my previous post, I just wanted it to be higher-pitched than the deep bellow of the Veyron/Chiron.
Although I just revisited the Chiron’s sound on Youtube, and I must say under hard acceleration it doesn’t sound too bad either.
From WikipediaI didn't know he speaks German. He must have grown up in Germany, because if you learn a new language in school, it's not the same as growing up or living in that country.
Rimac was born in Livno, SR Bosnia and Herzegovina, SFR Yugoslavia (present day Bosnia and Herzegovina) in 1988 to Zdenka and Ivan Rimac. The family temporarily moved to Frankfurt, Germany in 1991, when he was three years old, to escape the nascent Yugoslav Wars which had rendered the family's home region uninhabitable.[15] The family lived in Germany until 2000, after which they moved to Croatia, settling in Samobor, where Rimac's father founded a real estate company.[16]
I just remembered my favourite fluid dynamics term: turbule. As in: a single "packet" of turbulence, the smallest possible vortex; imminent entropy.
Any kit-car manufacturers reading this? A Honda VFR-powered kit-car would sound pretty close, and they rev to 12k, even if it won't set your trousers on fire. Maybe just get an MT-10 and have fun whilst everyone else is debating the relative merits of the generally unattainable...
I think you might not be disappointed. It will be less coarse than the outgoing W16, but far from the wail of the equal-length 6-into-1 exhausts on the V12s you mention.
Since it's not turbo-charged, the chances of some interesting and eye-wateringly priced aftermarket exhaust systems may well allow the new V16 engine to properly shriek (in much the same way the BRM V16 does from the right angles).
Alternatively, it would be very easy to make it sound similar to the W16 as well.
How did this age?This will be hilariously bad.
I’m guessing 2000 kg, 2000 hp, automatic transmission and a footprint of a small tank.
I wasn’t way off, was I?How did this age?
You were off by 5kg, pathetic.I wasn’t way off, was I?
Hense why the Countach is even more compact than the short McLaren by 6 inches.
Hilariously bad? Yes, you were way offI wasn’t way off, was I?
Yes, it is so subjective. Personally, I don't think any of them are particularly beautiful looking cars, but although I disagree with some of @Keef 's comments in this thread, I do agree that they are getting progressively uglier.Just goes to show, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I'll admit I wasn't a huge fan of the Veyron styling, loved the front of the the Chiron but the rear took some time to gel.
The Tourbillon is just stunning though. Defintely an evolution but by far their most covesive design.
To each his own. I think it’s horrendous.Hilariously bad? Yes, you were way off
I'm too scared to ask which cars you are a fan of...To each his own. I think it’s horrendous.
When it comes to new cars, hardly any, but the GMA T.50 would be an exception. That will give you a pretty good idea of what I like and don’t like, and why I think pretty much every car manufacturer gets it wrong these days.I'm too scared to ask which cars you are a fan of...
Hard to argue with that one. The T.50 is pretty perfect in terms of overall philosophy - engine, transmission, size, weight, packaging. But the Tourbillon is better lookingWhen it comes to new cars, hardly any, but the GMA T.50 would be an exception. That will give you a pretty good idea of what I like and don’t like, and why I think pretty much every car manufacturer gets it wrong these days.
Hard to argue with that one. The T.50 is pretty perfect in terms of overall philosophy - engine, transmission, size, weight, packaging. But the Tourbillon is better looking
Wow. I think the T.33 is the worst looking of the 3. Very awkward looking at the frontT.33 > Tourbillon > T.50
A Tourbillon spotted pottering around some test area or other. The crossplane character is crisp and clear, almost synthetic in quality. This bodes well for retaining some musicality at high rpm, however. BRM V16 comparisons likely not misplaced at all. There is also still just enough of that 45° interval sound to remind us of the outgoing W16.
On the other hand it sounds a lot like the composite of the intake and exhaust sounds of the NA AMG GT3 V8s. Again, far - far - from a terrible thing!
Overall very well executed, hopefully the production version isn't too neutered, but money is buying these so money can fix it.
The exhausts on this V16 are audibly lacking in any kind of merge, unlike NASCAR V8s, which are defined by near perfect merging in the intake and an offset merge in the exhaust. They're also very loud, and higher harmonics are more readily silenced. They don't stand a chance of passing noise regs without a merge, so this exhaust should not be considered final in my opinion.I assume they're just not revving it very high but that's not the NASCAR-like sound that we all got excited about.