- 11,207
- Adrian, Mich.
- cargorat323
- CargoRatt
Whose ever video that is, they should get royalties, lol.
bigbearHas anybody seen this ?
http://www.autoweek.com/article/20121113/CARNEWS/121119951?utm_source=DailyDrive20121113&utm_medium=enewsletter&utm_term=article3&utm_content=20121113-2014-Chevy-Corvette-appears-in-Gran-Turismo-5&utm_campaign=awdailydrive
Word got around pretty quick.
I liked this bit-
"We put a call in to Chevy to ask what the deal was: All they would say is that Chevy is working closely with the Sony to offer players of GT5 an authentic driving experience with the new Corvette. Chevy said more details would be available at a later date." -Jake Lingeman, Autoweek
Sounds good to me.
Considering how it seems that video is getting around, seems like a great idea.Whose ever video that is, they should get royalties, lol.
Has anybody seen this ?
http://www.autoweek.com/article/201...s-in-Gran-Turismo-5&utm_campaign=awdailydrive
Word got around pretty quick.
I liked this bit-
"We put a call in to Chevy to ask what the deal was: All they would say is that Chevy is working closely with the Sony to offer players of GT5 an authentic driving experience with the new Corvette. Chevy said more details would be available at a later date." -Jake Lingeman, Autoweek
Sounds good to me.
ClassicWhat about a PD-Edition 12 days of Christmas?
'On the first day of Christmas I was gave to me by PD~ A Midfield Speedway!'
I should probably have jumped back here a little earlier considering the direction the thread took, but I have been busy. Sorry guys!
Hmm... let's see...
If you are not interested in driving "just" a C7 Test Prototype (that is more than what the majority of us will be able to do in real life anyway...), I can only suggest to ignore it.
(Or maybe to wait even longer and see... =) )
I should probably have jumped back here a little earlier considering the direction the thread took, but I have been busy. Sorry guys!
Hmm... let's see...
If you are not interested in driving "just" a C7 Test Prototype (that is more than what the majority of us will be able to do in real life anyway...), I can only suggest to ignore it.
(Or maybe to wait even longer and see... =) )
Kaz just posted about it on his facebook page. I assume this is his page since it's in Japanese and he posts about stuff only Kaz would have access to...
http://www.facebook.com/kazunori.yamauchi.58
"Content Not Found"
You not have a FB account? Show up just fine for me...
I don't. So at least a screencap would do nicely right now
He didn't really say much, and the translation doesn't make sense.
![]()
I should probably have jumped back here a little earlier considering the direction the thread took, but I have been busy. Sorry guys!
Hmm... let's see...
If you are not interested in driving "just" a C7 Test Prototype (that is more than what the majority of us will be able to do in real life anyway...), I can only suggest to ignore it.
(Or maybe to wait even longer and see... =) )
Nice to know that PD's famous "6 month modeling time" (which, regardless of accuracy, is at least understandable ignorance to posess) is appreciated so much by people who might as well have looked at the already-available spy photos of the car on the internet for weeks now.
So there was good reason to include it? You know why they included it in the game and didn't tell anyone about it? Because for all we know, it could have been an accident just like it was an accident that it was found in the first place.
They certainly got tons of talking points about the NSX concept when they showed that off in GT5, didn't they? Everyone remembers the GT5 association, and it wasn't in fact generally just ignored entirely in favor of news about the car itself.
By the way:
Since the idea of people thinking that PD would model a car as part of a publicity stunt and then do something weird with their implementation in the game is so daft, isn't that NSX that they modeled and showed driving on a fictional GT5 track so much fun to use in GT5?
You're acting as if this is all so lovingly cut and dried and that makes the original guy so obviously wrong that you can claim that is a "sky is blue" situation, and based on what? One example of precedent from a completely different company that PD has obviously always had a special relationship with?
You're right. What was I thinking. If only I had qualified my statement as being a supposition to make it clear that I was speaking for why he might feel that way rather than conclusively stating why he is. I could have even phrased said qualifier like, say, "If that was the basis for him saying" than my massive gaffe could have been avoided.
Silly me.
Then what was the intended conclusion of "Oh, I didn't realise he'd commissioned PD to make this game for him. I can see why he'd be upset, now, $60 million is a lot of money." if it meant something besides "he wasn't paying for the game's development, so what he says is irrelevant?" Because even seeing it in the context of what Simon said, I'm not seeing how it means anything but that.
Not sure the Z06 C5 and Z06 C6 would count as Base model Corvettes, I would think those are performance versions. Technically, the C7 would be the first base model Corvette in GT5.
I think the 54' C1 and the 63' C2 are base models, but i'm not exactly sure.
I didn't even think about those. While the 63 could be, I'm not sure about the C1 as it technically isn't the original (assuming you're reffering to the Art Morrison car). Actually, there's also the C3 Sting Ray if I'm not mistaken So that would make 3 base models.
I'm a bit out of the loop here. Has it been officially confirmed that this car is coming to GT5? or is it another marketing excersise, like the video footage of the new NSX that never made it into the game?