Chassis Swap List
- Thread starter anthaliscious
- 1,538 comments
- 401,152 views
- 822
- New Orleans, Lo
- MLR_DAnGeR_KiiD
anthalisciousGood ol' drifting forum never changes.
Haha!
- 647
- South Australia
- TH137Z
well considering i tried the r32 chassis and all it did was pull wheelies up and down deep forest straight. i also found that putting the turbo supra motor in it removed the exhaust note altogether. bare with me also. it was my first time having a go at trying to hack since the hacks 1st came out
- 22
- Vancouver
- htsue
TH137Z, thanks for the contribution! Pretty flush:
Spare the satirical remarks, you look at wheelbase not length ffs.
Time and time again all your posts i've seen resulted in the preaching of your own ideals and subsequently trying to force it down the throat of others. Based on observations you're a bit narcissistic in nature, a self proclaimed Drift princess, lol. I digress.
If you have nothing to contribute to this thread besides your objection to the whole notion of stanced cars through swapping chassis (racecars, 4wd, formula 1, etc) then PLEASE do something else. Use other approaches of preaching YOUR ideals in the forum. Hell, since you're still so intent on disproving the claim of majority of drifters that like stance then make a thread where you make compatible swaps for FUNCTIONAL drift cars. Call it Princess's garage of something. And if that don't work maybe even ask the moderators to reconsider this thread being in the Drifting subforum if all you're going to do is stick at your point.
The point of this thread is to create chassis swaps for cars in order to achieve a flushed and stanced look. It's been assumed that coming into this thread that one should suspend their belief of reality when the only goal is to achieve stance because realistically who really would swap chassis to make a car have solely for aesthetics?
You're all talk about realism, yet the concept of swapping chassis for stance in itself is not realistic AT ALL, so why even bother to post? This thread obviously opposes your values.
Hell, if GT5 had wheel offset editors I am absolutely sure people here would use that. Obviously It's because of GT5's limited offer of customization that flush/stance needs to be achieve by these types of means. All the people contributing to this thread know this, but everyone's doing what they can DO within the given circumstances.
With that many posts on your account maybe you should think of other ways of contributing to the "community". Try to make a functional drift car with stance, but i guess your an absolute type of thinker, that one can exist and another can't. That a drift car should be first functional and second form. You seem to be well endowed with your vast knowledge of the JAPANESE drift world. I mean d1sl ladies championships, by jove that's the whole drift culture in a nutshell.. There's no drifters that value both being able to drift with form and function interrelate-dly. 326 power, abumoon, shakotan type drifters - naw they're not apart of your little idealistic drift world.
You're like one of those Jesuits that knock on everyone's doors to preach their ideals and sign them up for their church. Yet at least they're more polite and less condescending when people don't want to hear any of your ****.
You really think they'd have changed the length of a car? LolObviously cars still have the same length, so... xD
Spare the satirical remarks, you look at wheelbase not length ffs.
Time and time again all your posts i've seen resulted in the preaching of your own ideals and subsequently trying to force it down the throat of others. Based on observations you're a bit narcissistic in nature, a self proclaimed Drift princess, lol. I digress.
If you have nothing to contribute to this thread besides your objection to the whole notion of stanced cars through swapping chassis (racecars, 4wd, formula 1, etc) then PLEASE do something else. Use other approaches of preaching YOUR ideals in the forum. Hell, since you're still so intent on disproving the claim of majority of drifters that like stance then make a thread where you make compatible swaps for FUNCTIONAL drift cars. Call it Princess's garage of something. And if that don't work maybe even ask the moderators to reconsider this thread being in the Drifting subforum if all you're going to do is stick at your point.
The point of this thread is to create chassis swaps for cars in order to achieve a flushed and stanced look. It's been assumed that coming into this thread that one should suspend their belief of reality when the only goal is to achieve stance because realistically who really would swap chassis to make a car have solely for aesthetics?
You're all talk about realism, yet the concept of swapping chassis for stance in itself is not realistic AT ALL, so why even bother to post? This thread obviously opposes your values.
Hell, if GT5 had wheel offset editors I am absolutely sure people here would use that. Obviously It's because of GT5's limited offer of customization that flush/stance needs to be achieve by these types of means. All the people contributing to this thread know this, but everyone's doing what they can DO within the given circumstances.
With that many posts on your account maybe you should think of other ways of contributing to the "community". Try to make a functional drift car with stance, but i guess your an absolute type of thinker, that one can exist and another can't. That a drift car should be first functional and second form. You seem to be well endowed with your vast knowledge of the JAPANESE drift world. I mean d1sl ladies championships, by jove that's the whole drift culture in a nutshell.. There's no drifters that value both being able to drift with form and function interrelate-dly. 326 power, abumoon, shakotan type drifters - naw they're not apart of your little idealistic drift world.
You're like one of those Jesuits that knock on everyone's doors to preach their ideals and sign them up for their church. Yet at least they're more polite and less condescending when people don't want to hear any of your ****.
Last edited:
- 331
- KUSHifornia
- MaliciousMD
- MaliciousMD
FC3S <3
- 2
Hi! just joined gt planet and this is my first post.
Evo IX chassis fits well under galant vr4 (you can use evo ix rm for more offset)
Impreza Rally car '01 is a good chassis for the Impreza '00 for that flush look
http://i.imgur.com/F7eVwOY.jpg?1
http://i.imgur.com/5eu8vrw.jpg?1
Evo IX chassis fits well under galant vr4 (you can use evo ix rm for more offset)
Impreza Rally car '01 is a good chassis for the Impreza '00 for that flush look
http://i.imgur.com/F7eVwOY.jpg?1
http://i.imgur.com/5eu8vrw.jpg?1
👍
- 13
- Leksvik
- slintteps
The Galant VR4 looks nice! 👍
Ford RS200 street sits fine on both NSX '90 and ARTA NSX '00 chassis, this is with ARTA:
SVT150 Lightning chassis under Chrysler 300C, although some adjustments to weigth must be done for the realistic touch
And the Bluebird SSS '79 on RS200 standard chassis
Ford RS200 street sits fine on both NSX '90 and ARTA NSX '00 chassis, this is with ARTA:
SVT150 Lightning chassis under Chrysler 300C, although some adjustments to weigth must be done for the realistic touch
And the Bluebird SSS '79 on RS200 standard chassis
- 39
- Henrique_Drifter
Ford Ka + Renault Clio Sport 2.0 16V Chassis
- 2,315
- Sacramento California
- FT_Ant
- 2,386
- UK
- spikeyhairdude
- 4,280
- Say What Again, I dare you!
- Fastfox400
go buy the v12 vantage and look it up.
- 12
- London
- ThaGuy77
what if i don't have car pack and don't want to buy it.. Btw can someone tell me the hex code off v12 vantage chassis?
- 4,280
- Say What Again, I dare you!
- Fastfox400
Where are not allowed to discuss this on this forum.
- 12
- London
- ThaGuy77
Any ideas what fits good without these cars?
- 4,280
- Say What Again, I dare you!
- Fastfox400
- 3
- Australia Bro!
- i_is_iStoner
sup yall, anyone know what would fit a Ruf BTR 86' with a bit of poke? Im new to the forum here, is it okay to ask?
HammyTheNinja
(Banned)
- 50
- Driftland
- HammyTheNinja
Good Chassis for Skyline GTS-T R32?
Similar threads
