That is something I fully agree with, which is why I don't fully understand the backlash to what Joey said in the first place, although it depends on perspective. His justification and elaboration of his mindset is what I completely disagree with personally.But couldn't it be seen as improving the companies ability to create a cure, by funding it that much more?
The great thing is, we can rely on the media to spread fear around the globe. Headline on the CBC website this morning looks like a still from a zombie movie:
View attachment 894561
That guy has no idea how to eat a fried egg and yet they trust him with a gun.The great thing is, we can rely on the media to spread fear around the globe. Headline on the CBC website this morning looks like a still from a zombie movie:
View attachment 894561
That guy has no idea how to eat a fried egg and yet they trust him with a gun.
The WHO, if anyone believes them, seems to think we've seen the peak of the Corona Virus.
The EHIC is free no?Straw poll for UK members: if you had a holiday booked to Europe next week, would you go without an EHIC card? Is insurance enough?
One woman with fever was detained but released shortly after.
Unfortunately, what you and I may consider a 'proper' test for the virus (i.e. a blood test that can detect specific viruses) is not what is happening in the vast majority of cases here. Rather, screening techniques such as temperature checks etc. (which are non-specific) are being employed and a reliance on people observing recommended containment strategies (like self-isolation) to limit the spread of the virus.This I don't understand, I have seen this several times now, are the tests for this virus that fast?
@Touring Mars
Only about 30% of the Chinese have gone back to work. This hopefully will rapidly improve, but maybe not - they face major problems. Probably the rest of the world will face unexpected but soon to be clear problems. There will be shortages of fun stuff like Apple iPhones, but maybe also shortages of more serious items like food.
To maintain morale, wartime censors minimized early reports of illness and mortality in Germany, the United Kingdom, France, and the United States.
Martial law in the United States refers to several periods in United States history wherein a region or the United States as whole are placed under the control of a military body. On a federal level, only the president has the power to impose martial law. In each state the governor has the right to impose martial law within the borders of the state. In the United States, martial law has been used in a limited number of circumstances, such as directly after a foreign attack, as in Hawaii after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor or New Orleans during the Battle of New Orleans; after major disasters, such as the Great Chicago Fire of 1871 or the San Francisco earthquake of 1906; local leaders declared martial law to protect themselves from mob violence, such as Nauvoo, Illinois, during the Illinois Mormon War, or Utah during the Utah War; or in response to chaos associated with protests and rioting, such as the 1934 West Coast waterfront strike and during the Civil Rights Movement in response to the Cambridge riot of 1963.
The martial law concept in the United States is closely tied with the right of habeas corpus, which is in essence the right to a hearing on lawful imprisonment, or more broadly, the supervision of law enforcement by the judiciary. The ability to suspend habeas corpus is related to the imposition of martial law.[1] Article 1, Section 9 of the US Constitution states, "The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it." There have been many instances of the use of the military within the borders of the United States, such as during the Whiskey Rebellion and in the South during the Civil Rights Movement, but these acts are not tantamount to a declaration of martial law. The distinction must be made as clear as that between martial law and military justice: deployment of troops does not necessarily mean that the civil courts cannot function, and that is one of the keys, as the Supreme Court noted, to martial law.
In United States law, martial law is limited by several court decisions that were handed down between the American Civil War and World War II. In 1878, Congress passed the Posse Comitatus Act, which forbids military involvement in domestic law enforcement without congressional approval.
Throughout United States history are several examples of the imposition of martial law, aside from that during the Civil War.
I know companies like Co-diagnostics in Utah are developing rapid detection devices for the Corona Virus and others. The CDC has their own test they developed and are using in-house that they will make public soon. The technology to rapidly detect viruses is already here. It just needs to be mass produced and distributed.
I expect the Trump administration will attempt breathtaking levels of media censorship in addition to other Draconian measures to enforce control of ports of entry.
He's not, but there should be enough people around him to stop it.As stupid as Trump is about the Constitution, I'm guessing even he understands this.
Do you have a link for this? I've seen reports that believe China may have peaked but none were from the WHO. I'd like to share your source with a friend who is being over-dramatic on social media with picking and choosing what information to share. He's in his mid-30's with no health issues & doesn't seem to realize he's not at some severe risk of dying as soon as he gets it.The WHO, if anyone believes them, seems to think we've seen the peak of the Corona Virus.