Toronado
I'm sorry, but classic American car in Europe or not, they aren't better than a Mercedes Type 300 Limousine.
...I'd take the Impala, but thats because I'm a crazy redneck. So what do I know? Its part of the reason why I've been posting
soooo many Thunderbirds lately...
Prosthetic
You seem to stop at nothing to tell everyone how much you hate the new Tundra, or I should say Toyota.
I pick on the Tundra because it was supposed to be the grand "Game changer" according to Toyota and half of the Toyota-brainwashed press, particularly Motor Trend and Truck Trend. They say they've got the most horsepower, but its the highly expensive optional engine. They say that they tow the most, but simply put they do not. The interior and exterior design was supposed to be made for "men," but I don't know many who like it, even if it does have the all-important filing cabinet in the glove box (if you went to the debut in Chicago two years ago, you'll know what I mean).
In a world of promises, Toyota failed. Sure, the truck market shrunk up faster than most people had expected, but Toyota really didn't seem to put everything together quite right. Thats why they have come out the door with $2000 price discounts (that NEVER happens at Toyota), and then there have been the issues with the camshafts, crash tests, etc that have basically piled up to the point where many people, and I assume this includes the folks at the dealers, just have to laugh.
Its not always being negative, its pointing out the truth. Toyota screwed it up. The last Tundra was a halfway decent trucks for guys (or girls) who didn't need a
REAL truck. Lets face it; GM and Ford still have this market cornered, and Nissan has done a damn-good job of scaring everyone into building something better. But when Toyota comes out the gates with this new "Messiah of trucking" and loses out to a design that is nearly three years old, thats a problem.
So, I apologize for pointing out Toyota's failures, but quite frankly, it isn't the end of the world. I do it with most companies, be they Japanese, American, or European, but its always fun to beat-up on the "bully" out on the playground once in a while...
Toronado
The old Tundra was way better.
Agreed, but even I would take the current Tacoma over the previous Tundra. If memory serves, isn't the Tacoma more capable these days?
Perfect Balance
If you are talking about brakes, then I don't see why that's bad. I'd love to have bigger brakes on my car.
Heres the problem with the brakes in question: They're an option in the tow package, not standard. Standard brakes on the Tundra are completely inadequate to handle large loads, be they in the bed or on the trailer. Quite frankly, I'm surprised they didn't take a page from the GM or Ford book and just shove the huge brakes in there in the first place. If I recall the information correctly, towing anything in excess of 1000lbs with the Tundra (sans big brakes) requires trailer brakes. So, say I want to pull two jet-skis on a trailer, I'm going to need trailer brakes.
...The Silverado and Sierra? Standard equipment goes up to 2000 lbs before trailer brakes are required...