Driving the VT Roadster with a cigar? Ruining the damn car, I say
That's what I said it was in the first place. But that goes against two very obvious things:
- That's a Michelin display booth. Michelin had a significant part in developing the car. I would hope they know an LM when they have one.
- We've all established that McLaren does a fair amount of customization, and I can easily point out a number of awkwardly customer-modified F1's. That means that the color, wheels, and aero package are not exactly the right things to go by when determining spec level.
The extremely low production numbers on this car shouldn't make it hard to determine the full history of each car, but apparently it is. I've got the official book right in front of me (which I have actually read, word for word). And I've actually driven one (albiet briefly, 10 years ago). It's not as though I'm pulling this out of thin air....
It'd be nice if we saw your own pics because no offense, but I find it hard you saw all 3 of those in just 2 days.Spotted this week
B. ENGINEERING EDONIS!!!!!!
http://exoticspotter.com/list.php?page=3&batch=bt000117/bt000117_369090.jpg&model=all&make=all&location=all&frm=batch_listing"]
GUMPERT APOLLO!!!!!!!! [/URL]
CLK GTR!!!!!
3 lucky gits right there!!
BTW M5, there's actually around 300 VT Roadsters all together, and about 200 make up the pop head light models, built from 1995 to 1998.
Spotted this week
B. ENGINEERING EDONIS!!!!!!
http://exoticspotter.com/list.php?page=3&batch=bt000117/bt000117_369090.jpg&model=all&make=all&location=all&frm=batch_listing"]
GUMPERT APOLLO!!!!!!!! [/URL]
CLK GTR!!!!!
3 lucky gits right there!!
Thanks - but how do you know? Lamborghini Registry claims 466 made.
I just checked the production numbers of the 240SX I saw the other day:
1992 - 2327
1993 - 4602
1994 - 1391
Not sure on the year, could someone identify the year of it?
Wait... that B Enginneering thing is actually real ?
I thought it was some bull that HotWheels made up!
BTW, it would also have the F1 LM banner.
I've decided the M6 doesn't actually exist. I've seen four; they're just rebadged 650s. After all, who would be dumb enough to pay $95k for a car that's competing with - yet nowhere near as good as - the Porsche 911?
Then why pay $100K for a V8 Vantage? Why $120K plus for a Maranello when the E63 is shown that it can set statistics as good as they?
Toronado[/opinion]
For people with this cash, a lot of it has to do with posing. Everyone's got a Porsche. An Aston-Martin... that's different.
Either way - the M6 is a load of crap.
Agreed, obviously, but you have to remember who's taking the picture and where the picture was taken!
Stats are paper, the road is real, there is a difference, considering M6 has iDrive.
I guess the 911 GT3 997 is a load of crap too. It has a 4.1 0-60 same as the M6. The Aston Martins must be too. And the F430 must be crap too. The E63 M6 is only 1 second behind it in the QTR mile. 360 CS must be too.
If the M6 is crap to you, then a lot of cars must be crap too because it can match a lot of performance vehicles.