And what does that have to do with living by the Bible?
Well since it is among the last instructions from God to man in the Bible, I would have to say quite a bit.
Have you ever stopped to wonder why your god loves us all? - Why does he want our love? - What is the point in his 6000 year experiment? (assuming as you say 'the end is nigh') - Why did he create all this for such a short period of time? - Why do satan and he fight over the control of our souls? - Why does he want us to jump through all these hoops to only offer us an afterlife of incomprehensible certainty. What is the point of it all? - What does it prove and who does it prove it to?
From an outside point of view, do these actions not strike you as childish games?
Even though this was not directed to me, I would like to comment on it.
Considering the phrase "a house divided against itself cannot stand", no I don't see it as a game.
If it is, its pretty high stakes.
Whether or not Satan started the rebellion before or after we came along I'm not sure and I don't know that it matters much, since we are caught in the middle of it anyway and have to deal with it, regardless.
Why does he love us and want us to love him is an age old question.
I'm not sure its even answerable.
I'm not sure it needs to be, since it is what it is.
As far as hoop jumping there is only one major hoop he wants us to jump.
Accept and receive his provision for us through his son Jesus Christ.
By doing so you can be allied with his kingdom and become a part of it.
At the appointed time, the season of grace will end, and Satan and all those associated with him will be
isolated unto a place of punishment.
What does it prove and who does it prove it too?
Wow, good question.
I think it proves to all, how patient and long suffering he can be towards those that he loves and to what lengths he will go to save that which was lost.
And fair and just in that if you so choose, you can determine your own fate apart from him and he will allow you to do so.
If he has created us to be a part of what he has planned and will institute(no grief, no suffering, no sorrow, no pain, no death) I don't think I will be disappointed.
The ends also cannot also retrospectively render the means unjustified. Works both ways.
Either way expresses the same justification for the event.
The end justifying the means or vice versa.
The fact remains, deaths and injuries will be incurred.
The only way you can avoid the risk is not drive.
Because the ends do not justify the means, as previously explained. Also, god should know that.
Then you cannot drive.
Because once you do, you have already taken action to the contrary.
You are saying that your driving(the means) justifies any unfavorable consequences, or injustice.(the end)
The only way to avoid that is not to drive.
If I hit someone when I drive, I have committed an injustice.
Precisely my point.
When you decided to drive, you assumed the risk of injustice as justifiable.
Injustice is not a consequence of driving (I've already explained that in great detail).
Not in every instance.
If an injustice does result however, you can tell that to the guy you hit, I'm sure he will appreciate it.
However the risk of injustice is inherent in deciding to drive.
Therefore you are pre justifying any result, including injustice once you drive.
The reason that is true is due to the fact you cannot gaurantee that your driving will not result in an injustice.
Again the only way to avoid that is not to drive.
I drove to work this morning and committed no injustice. I robbed no one of their life or property.
Yes in this example your justification to drive did not result in an injustice.
All is right with the world.
If I do hit another car sometime in the future, I do not intend to attempt to justify that action by the fact that I wanted to drive.
You don't have to, once you got in the car and drove you already justified it.
Thats the point Danoff.