Drivetrain conversions

In drifting I see quite a few RWD Scion tCs and Imprezas.

I would like to make an Eclipse GT '05 RWD, the car looks alright but bas no driving use whatsoever.
 
In drifting I see quite a few RWD Scion tCs and Imprezas.

I would like to make an Eclipse GT '05 RWD, the car looks alright but bas no driving use whatsoever.

If I would drift, which I don't ever, I would take a TVR Cerbera Speed 12 converted to AWD.
 
Yes, for me drivetrain and engine swaps would be a welcome addition to the GT series 👍

I have loads of fun with that stuff in Forza4 :cool:
 
Drivetrain and engine swaps are a must in my opinion, as long as they are sensible they allow real cars to be recreated, one of the first projects I did in FM4 along these lines was to recreate the Micra R:


Nissan Micra R
Based on the car Nissan UK had built its a 267bhp 2.0 litre turbo RWD conversion stripped out for the track, but still road legal (so not running slicks in this case).







 
I saw a rockstar Formula Drift tC in that game. I want to be able to turn FWD cars into drifters in GT5.
 
I think drivetrain modifacations are not necissary for GT6. I know it might sound interesting for some people but i think it kills all the cars characteristics and creates cars that handle nothing like their real counterpart. If the PP system is taking those changes into account it has to be balanced properly because otherwise you will only see Renault Clio V6 with 4WD online dominating the leaderboards while real 4WD cars like the Impreza for example have no chance anymore.

If its balanced properly its ok but If there is a feature concerning the technical side of the cars that i would happily sacrifice for something else, drivetrain modifications is the one.
 
Well it'll have to be realistic in some way, ie no hyper/super car changes, or pre made racing cars. Just every day ones
 
lambo make a RWD and so do Nismo. if its realistic then ok, btw so do Mclaren. Some cars just shouldnt be changed like veyron or zonda
 
lambo make a RWD and so do Nismo. if its realistic then ok, btw so do Mclaren. Some cars just shouldnt be changed like veyron or zonda

Instead of making it unable to be done, it should just be very expensive.
Say, the Veyron costs 2,000,000 new, so converting it RWD should cost 3,500,000.
 
Drivetrain conversions are stupid IMHO. There's just not enough room under your Civic for a transfer case and rear axle/diff. This would have to change interiors, as the floor would be cut up and an all new shape. Trucks such as the Ram aren't AWD either, they are RWD with 4WD option, that's all you need.

Have any of you "I want a 500+hp V8 AWD former FF car" They aren't designed for that. I have personally followed a thread on ModdedMustangs where someone, in his garage, swapped a 98-ish Mustang Cobra rolling chassis under an Acura Integra body. Please read through and see how long and hard it was, even for someone that could afford it and knew how to weld etc. It's just no that easy. Here is a link

The only swaps that should be available should be engines from the manufacturer's designated performance division; such as Chrysler/Dodge/Plymouth: Mopar, Ford, etc: Ford Racing, BMW: M(Motorsport). Maybe make AWD cars RWD as that is possible fairly easily.
 
Last edited:
Drivetrain conversions are stupid IMHO. There's just not enough room under your Civic for a transfer case and rear axle/diff. This would have to change interiors, as the floor would be cut up and an all new shape. Trucks such as the Ram aren't AWD either, they are RWD with 4WD option, that's all you need.

That doesn't matter. Just modify what you need to modify to get it to work. I'm all for being able to swap an engine into a car and then having the engine twist the transmission into a knot. I don't know if that will happen though because it will mean that each car will need to be modeled in a lot more detail.

Have any of you "I want a 500+hp V8 AWD former FF car" They aren't designed for that. I have personally followed a thread on ModdedMustangs where someone, in his garage, swapped a 98-ish Mustang Cobra rolling chassis under an Acura Integra body. Please read through and see how long and hard it was, even for someone that could afford it and knew how to weld etc. It's just no that easy. Here is a link

Difficulty doesn't matter. It's possible, so it should be possible in game. RMing a car isn't as easy as pressing a button, but that doesn't mean it shouldn't be in GT.

The only swaps that should be available should be engines from the manufacturer's designated performance division; such as Chrysler/Dodge/Plymouth: Mopar, Ford, etc: Ford Racing, BMW: M(Motorsport). Maybe make AWD cars RWD as that is possible fairly easily.

Restricts like this only limit fun, content, and variety. Working out how to best fit a V-12 into a Fiat 500 and then modifying the car so it can handle the engine could add some depth to GT. It's also not unrealistic, especially given that we can but unlimited copies of 1960's LeMans racers and managed garages of 1000's of cars.
 
You can't put a v12 into a Fiat and expect it to work though. Look at the Dodge Dart GTS from 1970. Mopar said it couldn't be done, Mr. Norm's Garage did it and said 'Look, here it is. You can't turn it more than 15* before the tire hits the header, so don't do anything but drag race it'. It just doesn't make sense. This is just GT5 fans wanting FM4.

And on another topic...WHY DO YOU KEEP UNDERMINING ME!!! lol, not a problem with it as long as we can keep it civil, you really seem like you know what you're talking about. I just don't like how this is a bigger want than the fact that things like a 4WD truck is actually FR until changed, and the adj. center diff doesn't go to 0/100 like described.
 
You can't put a v12 into a Fiat and expect it to work though. Look at the Dodge Dart GTS from 1970. Mopar said it couldn't be done, Mr. Norm's Garage did it and said 'Look, here it is. You can't turn it more than 15* before the tire hits the header, so don't do anything but drag race it'. It just doesn't make sense. This is just GT5 fans wanting FM4.

Who said anything about engines? This is a drivetrain swap thread, and I want a AWD F40!
 
gamerdog6482
Who said anything about engines? This is a drivetrain swap thread, and I want a AWD F40!

But that's the point, if we're going for realism the traction gains that an "AWD F40" would be negated by the added weight and weight distribution that awd requires..the finished product will be less F40 and more primative FF...this is why if there's anything that I hope, it is that GT6 practices restraint in allowing drive/powertrain swaps...it shouldn't be too hard, most of the chassis from major manufacturers, no matter the selling configuration had an option for a different drivetrain (fwd-awd, rwd-awd); GT6 should abide by these to maintain some air of civility
 
The Mazda Axela 23z is another of those fairly disappointing cars, it would serve a much better purpose as an FR with a 654x2 rotary engine supplying the power.
 
You can't put a v12 into a Fiat and expect it to work though. Look at the Dodge Dart GTS from 1970. Mopar said it couldn't be done, Mr. Norm's Garage did it and said 'Look, here it is. You can't turn it more than 15* before the tire hits the header, so don't do anything but drag race it'. It just doesn't make sense. This is just GT5 fans wanting FM4.

And on another topic...WHY DO YOU KEEP UNDERMINING ME!!! lol, not a problem with it as long as we can keep it civil, you really seem like you know what you're talking about. I just don't like how this is a bigger want than the fact that things like a 4WD truck is actually FR until changed, and the adj. center diff doesn't go to 0/100 like described.

Ummm been done w12 golf, works... kinda plus RWD
VW_Golf-W12_353_1920x1200.jpg


Anyway its more, FWD to AWD (Stability) and AWD to RWD (Flamboyancy) is the main issue, RWD to AWD and AWD to FWD and RWD to FWD are stupid and backwards
 
Problem is, that's a W12, it's about the same length as a V8 (4 cylinders long), there are 3 banks of cylinders, a V12 is 2 cylinders longer with 2 banks of 6 though
 
The Mazda Axela 23z is another of those fairly disappointing cars, it would serve a much better purpose as an FR with a 654x2 rotary engine supplying the power.

True, theres a few other cars that should be say RWD but arent due to budge. Toyota Celica which is a FF coupe, same with mitsubishi Ecipse and older FTO, Alfa Spider, Fiat Barchetta all be better driven from the rear.
 
Problem is, that's a W12, it's about the same length as a V8 (4 cylinders long), there are 3 banks of cylinders, a V12 is 2 cylinders longer with 2 banks of 6 though

Need for Speed Shift did engine swaps but only aloud one per car so PD would choice 1 or 2 then, 787b engine in rx7, 13b in rx8, rb26dett in silvia s15, 2jz in celica etc, you get my drift. Only what possible to fit the bay. As N4S did, the racing engine for the road car equivalate for easy power gain.
 
You can't put a v12 into a Fiat and expect it to work though. Look at the Dodge Dart GTS from 1970. Mopar said it couldn't be done, Mr. Norm's Garage did it and said 'Look, here it is. You can't turn it more than 15* before the tire hits the header, so don't do anything but drag race it'. It just doesn't make sense. This is just GT5 fans wanting FM4.

If they added drag racing, that wouldn't be a problem. Even if they didn't, people would drag anyway. More options never hurts. We've had drag cars before in GT even though they couldn't turn and there was no where to use them (GT2 HKS drag racer). Still, it was fun to drive.

And on another topic...WHY DO YOU KEEP UNDERMINING ME!!! lol, not a problem with it as long as we can keep it civil, you really seem like you know what you're talking about. I just don't like how this is a bigger want than the fact that things like a 4WD truck is actually FR until changed, and the adj. center diff doesn't go to 0/100 like described.

I just like to discuss things, don't mind me. If everyone agreed I wouldn't be here, it would be a dull forum lol.

But that's the point, if we're going for realism the traction gains that an "AWD F40" would be negated by the added weight and weight distribution that awd requires..the finished product will be less F40 and more primative FF...this is why if there's anything that I hope, it is that GT6 practices restraint in allowing drive/powertrain swaps...it shouldn't be too hard, most of the chassis from major manufacturers, no matter the selling configuration had an option for a different drivetrain (fwd-awd, rwd-awd); GT6 should abide by these to maintain some air of civility

A AWD F40 won't necessarily be slower. If you had a conversion built to F1 quality in terms of design and materials I'd expect it to be much faster. There's really nothing you can't do to a car, it just depends on how much time and money you want to throw at it. I don't think those should be concerns in GT though. Just keep the focus on realism.
 
Back