- 313
- England
- yellowbeard_uk
That's a bit of an overreaction to being beaten by a 'customer car'
That's a bit of an overreaction to being beaten by a 'customer car'
The CRZ is too short to fit within the NGTC regulations.
So was the civic
As is the Focus and the 125... It seems a bit odd to set the minimum length at 4.4m and then let 3 cars of 4.3m in. Unless they round it up so 4.3something becomes 4.4m.
Really?They make up for the extra length by having really long bumpers,
All the cars have to be the same width, so the narrower ones need wider wheelarches to meet the regulations.it's the same for Welch's Proton which isn't wide enough without all the bodywork like those massive wheel arches.
Equalised width of 1875mm
Thorney wanted to run an Evoque but Land Rover didn't want them to because of 'brand image', I wonder if that would change if a team that has proven it can make a successful car was knocking on their door?
Really?
Look identical to me. I'm still going by the rounding up theory I posted above, or the "not turning down of major manufacturers" theory posted by thecracker.
All the cars have to be the same width, so the narrower ones need wider wheelarches to meet the regulations.
Alan GowThere has been no special dispensation or change; the regulation has always stated that the cars should be 'a minimum (nominal) overall length of 4.40 metres'.
It has always been stated as a nominal figure to allow for cars that are very close (like the Focus for example, which is only approx 1.5 inches under) without having to resort to the ridiculous and expensive exercise of special models being produced with small additional bumper extensions in order to meet the figure....which happened in the past.
Austin has committed to next season as has Welch by the way.
with a new engine
How many engine suppliers has Austin been through now? 4 I think?
2011 - Ric Wood
2011-2012 Lehmann
2013 - Field Motorsport
2013 - TOCA/Swindon
Language warning but (from Silverstone):