Because it's not curable & there's nothing really out there close to being deemed as a cure.
Same for the flu. Bed rest and hot soup.
Just experimental drugs that can only be made in small batches right now.
Likely based on the antivirals that we are just now getting to be functional in flu cases.
It's not like say, double/pneumonia, where you can be administered to the hospital for a week or so, thrown on some antibiotics & immediately have the odds in your favor in surviving.
Only works on bacteria, so of course it isn't the same. Now, viral pneumonia...
Ebola has, from what I've observed, a pretty 50/50 chance of killing you, even with the best medicine around. Nobody wants those odds, & nobody wants an non-curable virus with those odds that can spread (a very hard way to spread, but spread none the less).
This is true, but it is due to lack of exposure. The flu and cold used to be just as deadly to unexposed groups.
A big fear with a virus like this, imo, is to avoid a repeat in history of something like the Bubonic Plague (not presumably on a 1/3rd population death toll, but massive still).
See, this comparison to previous, less technological and advanced times/cultures just doesn't work for me. You can't even compare it to living in a time where people were superstitious about cats and rats burrowed into your home. You can't even compare life and medical facilities in the US to Africa or rural China.
That fact that we are all now reacting to news stories is another issue. People see the headline, "Man in New York Tests Positive for Ebola" and decide that it is panic time. Do a little more digging and you find out that he was a doctor in Africa treating Ebola not long ago.
Only two Americans have contracted Ebola in America, and they were healthcare workers working with an infected patient. If you just look at data for people who dies with Ebola in the US the mortality rate is lower, although the data is not enough to be significant yet. Lack of available data is kind of a good thing.
But
here is a doctor explaining why his patient survived here in the US.
We are not being critical of our colleagues in west Africa. They suffer from a terrible lack of infrastructure and the sort of testing that everyone in our society takes for granted, such as the ability to do a complete blood count—measuring your red blood cells, your white blood cells and your platelets—which is done as part of any standard checkup here. The facility in Liberia where our two patients were didn’t even have this simple thing, which everyone assumes is done as part of your annual physical.
What we found in general is that among our Ebola patients, because of the amount of fluid they lost through diarrhea and vomiting, they had a lot of electrolyte abnormalities. And so replacing that with standard fluids [used in hospital settings] without monitoring will not do a very good job of replacing things like sodium and potassium. In both of our patients we found those levels to be very low. One of the messages we will be sending back to our colleagues is even if you don’t have the equipment to measure these levels, do be aware this is occurring when patients are having a lot of body fluid loss.
Our two patients also gained an enormous amount of fluid in their tissues, what we call edema. In Ebola virus disease there is damage to the liver and the liver no longer makes sufficient amount of protein; the proteins in the blood are very low and there is an enormous amount of fluid leakage out into the tissues. So one of the takeaway messages is to pay closer attention to that and perhaps early on try to replace some of these proteins that patients’ livers lack.
They don't even have complete medical testing data in Africa. They can't properly see what is going on in order to properly treat it. Lots of diseases are very deadly in those circumstances. Hell, anesthesia is deadly under those circumstances.
When he explains how the treatment and procedures were done you can see a clear difference in the resources in the US vs Africa.
Twenty-one nurses, five physicians and we had the support of hundreds. Just making sure all the disposables coming out of those rooms were sterilized before we put them on the federal highway system, for example—we had to certify to the contractor that takes our regulated medical waste that it didn’t have active Ebola virus inside it. We didn’t have the equipment to handle all of the waste but in two hours facilities brought in industrial autoclaves [which sterilize materials with extreme heat] to replace the system that we had. We would have been drowning in garbage without them.
They had 26 medical personal for one patient. There are probably more than 26 patients per doctor/nurse in Africa. And they had access to the necessary equipment to sterilize all waste in under two hours. I wonder if some of the African facilities have an autoclave at all.
Ultimately, we exist in a very different world from those with a 50% mortality rate and excessively high infectious rate.