- 87,055
- Rule 12
- GTP_Famine
Turns out that, to forty-five people per ebola fatality, neither of those things is true.Hunger might kill you in 3 weeks but it doesn't spread and it is curable.
Turns out that, to forty-five people per ebola fatality, neither of those things is true.Hunger might kill you in 3 weeks but it doesn't spread and it is curable.
to forty-five people per ebola fatality
My favorites are the Anti-Vax and Homeopathic nutters, who can totally combat Ebola (and every thing else) with Colloidal Silver (note to the potentially stupid - this does not work and is nonsense).I'm particularly fond of the articles that state they are "Exposing the Conspiracy! Ebola is a patent! Ebola is man-made! Ebola is being used to keep the African population under control! Ebola is a black-killing disease".
Take a good guess at the "culture" (for PC folks) that actually believe this garbage.
Unfortunately your right but you are comparing numbers which are quite static to an exponential increase, you could update that graph in a years time and find that Ebola has flew past it.Turns out that, to forty-five people per ebola fatality, neither of those things is true.
Not particularly likely. See the third response below this one...Unfortunately your right but you are comparing numbers which are quite static to an exponential increase, you could update that graph in a years time and find that Ebola has flew past it.
Ebola is official stats since the outbreak, the others are estimates of deaths in Africa in the same time period from WHO data.According to the caption, the data-keeping began in March '14, with estimates based on '12 data.
[Citation needed]Based on how rapidly the Ebola epidemic is spreading
Oh I don't doubt it, but EBOV fatalities would need to double every month by then to get close to hunger - and keep on doubling for a full quarter to get up with HIV. And that's just in Africa.this graphic will look seriously different March, 2015.
And yet the global fearmongering response seems to be in fine fettle indeed.The real horror is the 2016 look, unless the epidemic is stamped out. The global response so far is deemed to be inadequate by many sources.
And Nigeria is not far behind.Professor Farnsworth here :
Good news everyone!
It seems that when you handle the crisis situation called Ebola as you should it can be contained!
Senegal declared free of Ebola
Professor Farnsworth out.
Because people aren't educated on the virus. All they see is a story on the evening news about a growing epidemic on the other side of the world, and hear dire warnings from the WHO and the UN, and then all of a sudden it's in America. They have no understanding of how Ebola works, how you can catch it or how it is treated, and most media outlets have dumbed their reports down either for the sake of making the story understandable or sensationalising it.I don't understand that panic around Ebola. It has no chances in well-developed countries. It only spreads in conditions of total insanitary. And it is possible to cure.
[Citation needed]
Last week the UN special envoy on Ebola said the cases double every three weeks
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/envoy-ebola-cases-doubling-weeks-26105134
I have heard of death rates ranging from 50% to 80%, which is quite a spread.
Last week the UN special envoy on Ebola said the cases double every three weeks
Your reference linkUN Envoy: Ebola Cases Doubling Every 3-4 Weeks
So, your source says that transmission is likely to completely stop after the end of 2014. PANIC!!!!David Nabarro“At the moment, the outbreak curve is increasing exponentially. That means we’re doubling every three to four weeks. Being fully controlled is when transmission completely stops, and that will take a bit more time, after the end of this year."
The American establishment, i.e., government and public health sector, is under considerable criticism at the moment for its lugubrious reaction to the problem.
http://www.wtsp.com/story/news/2014...ts-ebola-scare-at-charlotte-douglas/17476137/
So I have a work trip in a couple weeks. Am I going to have to worry my allergies will flare up and people will freak out? Sheesh.
The point is I could sneeze and the uninformed could freak. But I was mainly joking.Only if your allergies make you feel nauseous, give you the chills and kick your temperature up to 100 (if they do, you should probably get that checked out).
"The inconsistent response by health officials in monitoring and limiting the movement of health workers has been one of the critical blunders in the Ebola outbreak."Is that because the reaction hasn't been working, or is it because the public would prefer to see a more energetic response to what they perceive to be a major crisis?
People and groups who don't know what they're talking about rarely give reasonable and rational criticism.
"The inconsistent response by health officials in monitoring and limiting the movement of health workers has been one of the critical blunders in the Ebola outbreak."
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/storie...ME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2014-10-18-09-20-13
Fair enough.
Still, I'd hardly call 3 people infected in a country of 300 million an "outbreak". They got a bit lucky in that more people weren't infected, but it doesn't appear that it's actually that easy to get infected.
Please tell me what's so funny about infectious haemorrhagic fevers. I must be missing something.
This is hilarious. One of the 76 being monitored at Texas Presbyterian has taken it upon herself to go on a cruiseliner trip. So now she is quarantined in her cabin with her husband, and the liner's next scheduled port of call, Cozumel, has denied permission for the cruiseliner to land. So now multiple thousands of people are stuck on a cruiseliner? This is reported on Fox cable news.
As indeed is the nation of Nigeria, as of today.The Spanish nurse is free of ebola.