Brend
Premium
- 11,771
- Scotland
- GTSophy-Lapos
- ClassicBrend
In the event that Ebola makes it into a developed country, the existing health infrastructure will be enough to contain it. The authorities will be well aware of the issue, and will monitor flights coming from West Africa. Should someone infected with the disease arrive, health officials will no doubt pass on advice to the population.I'm getting a bit nervous here already...
In case doom would strike and it contaminates our countries what would you guys think would be some sort of protection? Wear facemasks and surgical gloves when going out?
In the event that Ebola makes it into a developed country, the existing health infrastructure will be enough to contain it.
Just a thought. Are there any cases of a survivor contracting Ebola again a second time? Does the human body develop a stronger resistance to it?
Ebola isn't contagious during the incubation phase. It's only once you start showing symptoms that you become a danger to others. Even then, it is easily contained - it cannot survive outside a host for long, and can be contained with water, chlorine and quarantine. Even once you catch Ebola, it's not a death sentence; the sooner you get treated, the better your chances of survival.....After the unlucky ones get it and die. They should totally focus on making sure it doesn't even get here.
Ebola isn't contagious during the incubation phase. It's only once you start showing symptoms that you become a danger to others. Even then, it is easily contained - it cannot survive outside a host for long, and can be contained with water, chlorine and quarantine. Even once you catch Ebola, it's not a death sentence; the sooner you get treated, the better your chances of survival.
Correct.Is it correct that there's currently no proven cure or vaccine? I read in "the news" (I know, I know) that treatment revolves around physically sustaining the patient while they the either die/survive. I believe the survival rate for those going into appropriate early treatment was about 70%?
Catching a sore-throat right now couldn't make me more paranoid.
You're right. It should be Africa's problem. It's their fault that they got sick in the first place. After all, they were stupid enough to be born there. The health infrastructure is substandard, but hey, so long as there is no immediate threat to you, it's Somebody Else's Problem. Even if America has facilities and knowledge and resources that could be used to not only fight the outbreak, but shorten it.We don't need anyone sick getting here. Keep them in quarantine over in Africa.
Ignoring the obvious irrational ranting, would you like to specify who is/are at fault for Africa's poor living conditions?You're right. It should be Africa's problem. It's their fault that they got sick in the first place. After all, they were stupid enough to be born there. The health infrastructure is substandard, but hey, so long as there is no immediate threat to you, it's Somebody Else's Problem. Even if America has facilities and knowledge and resources that could be used to not only fight the outbreak, but shorten it.
who is/are at fault for Africa's poor living conditions?
Colonists and missionaries, who are responsible that most African nations couldn't really develope and have a very poor educational standard.Ignoring the obvious irrational ranting, would you like to specify who is/are at fault for Africa's poor living conditions?
With the distance and bloody big desert between you and the affected area, you are in no more danger than Europe or the US.
Just for the sake of clarity (because internet): Serious, or sarcasm?Yeah Colonialism tended to strip resources and wealth whilst providing very little development to the country itself.
Just for the sake of clarity (because internet): Serious, or sarcasm?
The ranting is not irrational.Ignoring the obvious irrational ranting, would you like to specify who is/are at fault for Africa's poor living conditions?
The guy saying not to lock the borders up and leave Africans to their own devices is the one being irrational?Ignoring the obvious irrational ranting, would you like to specify who is/are at fault for Africa's poor living conditions?
My point was that if Africa's conditions were proper, there would be no need to worry about a dangerous outbreak.The guy saying not to lock the borders up and leave Africans to their own devices is the one being irrational?
You're missing the point entirely. It's not about who's fault or responsibility it is. The west have the resources to provide significant aid to these people that can't be provided by their own governments, and at very little to no risk to the population here.
And if I was Brad Pitt I wouldn't need to worry about my appearance.My point was that if Africa's conditions were proper, there would be no need to worry about a dangerous outbreak.