As I understand it there's a 3% margin of error. Surely 29.3% is still close enough to 30% that the PM will stand by his word?
So we have to wait and see, or is there any new news from the homestead? I'm not going to go looking at U.S. western news for it 👍
So prepare for an "altered" agreement being released and signed within the month.
Small minorities of angry people, when well organized, can out shout the divided, fearful, apathetic centrist majority in Western Europe.
This time the stakes weren’t so high, but next time, they might be: The far-right is now the largest political force in the Netherlands.
This I didn't know ...
Well that didn't take long... apparently 'Downing Street' has said that Apple would be welcome to set up shop here in the UK. I'm guessing that is not going to go down very well in Dublin.It's a hard one. On one hand the EU has a point in that by not offering these deals to all businesses, Ireland is being biased, unfair and anti-competitive. This will also be viewed by the tax paying public in Ireland (and the EU) as just another billion dollar giant not paying their way - flames I'm sure the press will be more than willing to fan.
On the other, this highlights the argument that the EU shouldn't be able to meddle with individual states' laws, of any kind. This obviously plays into the hands of the Brexit supporters who'll use this as a perfect example of why the UK should/will leave and be able to craft it's own economic destiny without interference.
There's also another point (which I'm sure Apple will bring up) that there are other economic advantages to Ireland of having Apple (or any global company) operate there. There are jobs and infrastructures around their business which add to the economy and pay their staff's rents and mortgages.
So, we have an EU member state who wants to boost its economy and job market for its population by offering a deal with large corporations while being part of a collective group with its own rules/laws to prevent this from happening as it's anti-competitive.
Good luck everyone.
At the moment I think the UK Gov will jump all over anything that appears to justify their break from the EU. At least it's a positive in that it shows the UK will be free to make any deals they feel work. Possibly.Well that didn't take long... apparently 'Downing Street' has said that Apple would be welcome to set up shop here in the UK. I'm guessing that is not going to go down very well in Dublin.
Yeh, it was reported in The Telegraph who are also pretty keen on anything that paints Brexit in a positive light.At the moment I think the UK Gov will jump all over anything that appears to justify their break from the EU.
This is true, but the difference being that Britain will be able to cut (or maintain) such deals in the future once it is out of the EU, but EU member states will no longer be able to get away with it.Yeah but it's not as though Britain hasn't already had these kind of dodgy deals.
Perhaps it needs some middle ground and a more open and enforced corporation tax. Take Jersey as an example. We all know that the banks here pay zero tax and most people don't agree with that. However, we also understand that brings a lot of well paid jobs and a strong pyramid of support industries with lots more jobs all paying tax back into the state. So without the banks being here the state and population would be considerably less well off even though the banks don't pay any tax themselves. The same would be true to a certain extent in the UK (or anywhere).Yeah but it's not as though Britain hasn't already had these kind of dodgy deals. For many years there have been cases of large multinationals, both domestic and foreign, evading tax. Vodafone springs to mind. They have long had favourable deals with the Treasury; they owed HMRC about £8 billion, stumped up around £2 billion, asked the Treasury to write the rest off and the Treasury accepted it. They continue to write off their corporation tax against their capital expenditure.
Starbucks and Amazon are other firms who like to work around tax "avoidance".
So nothing about that screams "New Britain, new deals for Britain" or "Brexit allows us to cut our own deals" to me. More of the same tripe we've had for decades.
This is true, but the difference being that Britain will be able to cut (or maintain) such deals in the future once it is out of the EU, but EU member states will no longer be able to get away with it.
Because Ireland is a Eurozone country so it has to comply with the same rules as the other Eurozone countries.But why has the UK been able to get away with it (allegedly) for so long? Why is Ireland and its deals under scrutiny but we and ours are not? After all, we have been in the EEC/EU for the same length of time as Ireland.
I don't think Ireland being in the Eurozone makes a difference - I think @Liquid's point is that the UK is also an EU member so why is the EU not also getting its knickers in a twist over the UK's dodgy tax dealings, but is when it comes to Ireland and Apple. One answer may be that the EU is in fact conducting similar investigations all over Europe, including in the UK... one reason that Apple stands out, however, is the sheer scale of the tax avoidance - Apple is the world's largest taxpayer, and 13 billion Euros is a lot of money!Because Ireland is a Eurozone country so it has to comply with the same rules as the other Eurozone countries.
As I said, it's probably the pyramid of support industries around Apple, paying taxes etc. that earns money for the government making it worthwhile. Plus having the likes of Apple operating out of your country is seen as a lure to other businesses and, hopefully, further investment. It's not like Ireland hasn't had it's fair share of employment issues in recent years.It's terrifyingly hilarious how the Irish government doesn't want this money.
It's clear there's a grand, overarching contest between sovereign national governments and the EU. Greater internationalization - globalization - of the world might seem inevitable given all the developments in human rights, democracy, commerce and technology that we've seen over the centuries. But I expect conservative (and reactionary) forces to put up a stiff fight.Hungary held a referendum yesterday on whether or not to accept a controversial EU plan to relocate refugees, asylum seekers and migrants that would see all EU member states being obliged to accept set numbers of migrants.
The result was that 98% of those who voted voted against the EU plan, but only 43% of the population voted, rendering the referendum 'invalid' according to the EU; however, the Hungarian PM (who campaigned vigorously in favour of rejecting the EU plan) has claimed that the result is valid and that the Hungarian parliament will reject the EU plan, putting Hungary on a collision course with the EU. Under the existing plans, Hungary would be obliged to accept less than 1,700 refugees...
It's clear there's a grand, overarching contest between sovereign national governments and the EU. Greater internationalization - globalization - of the world might seem inevitable given all the developments in human rights, democracy, commerce and technology that we've seen over the centuries. But I expect conservative (and reactionary) forces to put up a stiff fight.