There were no ill-feelings involved. I was just acting stupid. You wrote an improper sentence though and that actually made sense, but it wasn't grammatically correct. I do it too, and that's how I was acting stupid when I told you your grammar was incorrect. Honestly, I meant nothing serious by it and am not trying to make a fool out of you. It's the other way around if anything. I'm acting a fool
.
I do too, but I'm fascinated to see what kind of next-genness PD are putting into GT6. That headlight pic in your quote is insane. And then there's that article from GamesRadar:The headlight
I wonder how much detail it will be in GT7.
This is a hardware feature on PS4. Most likely, it's paired down a bit from that monster system and an SPU assigned to manage it. But still, this is incredible use of technology that even Scaff and I thought would have to be cut back in almost every area including resolution to achieve. And yet, PD evidently hasn't cut back a thing. Instead, they tore open the entire GT5 Engine, something that was worked on for around four years, and made it even better - the resolution was increased for crying out loud! This is some kind of dark magic the team is doing, because most developers have accomplished all they can in a systems fourth and fifth years. This is an unreal testament to how powerful this "obsolete" seven year old hardware really is. And what quantum wizards PD are.
Well... and yet they are - at least one game is. And leave it to Polyphony Digital to make that game.
Ok, but I'd still like to see what was wrong.There were no ill-feelings involved. I was just acting stupid. You wrote an improper sentence though and that actually made sense, but it wasn't grammatically correct. I do it too, and that's how I was acting stupid when I told you your grammar was incorrect. Honestly, I meant nothing serious by it and am not trying to make a fool out of you. It's the other way around if anything. I'm acting a fool
Ding! Ding!
The entire underbelly thing is kind of a moot point, in a game where the car only rolls over once in a blue moon. I rather have those polys in the body.
Same goes to the tires, theres a lot of polys in a single rim just for the outside. You have to double the amount if you do the inside too. To even this out, you have the to reduce the details. So you end with a double sided rim that is only half as detailed on the side you see like 90% percent of the time. In my view that would be a bad decision.
There is also another little thing to a 3D model you like to ignore. Mesh quality.
Just compare this picture to the one posted by you.
Look how beautiful and even the mesh is, almost no triangles. This gives a very clean smooth and very few distortion. A mesh like this can also be upscaled easily with the press of a button, futureproofing it. Same method on the other mesh will most probably mess it up.
Do you understand how adaptive tesellation works and how are modeled the cars in GT6?
.I don't know much about subdivision ,tessellation and adaptive tessellation, but i'm just going off of what happens when I tessellate a model.It looks like the picture from PD prior to tessellation and after I tessellate the faces it looks like the model Samus posted.The picture showing the adaptive tessellation also looks like the picture samus posted.
Like I said, it wasn't "preposterously" wrong and I said that I wasn't being serious, but here goes.
"I saw a bunch of pics (or pictures - I COULD go there) on the last page, then saw the title. Preposterous, it is (or 'It's preposterous)."
Again, I was being anal about it and didn't mean to make you look like a fool, especially since you thought my intention was to target you. Didn't have anything to do, saw the post...jackpot.
Actually, all I tried to say was that certain people went awfully off topic.
You're right.
