Fanatec Announcements: CSW V2 Reviews Out

  • Thread starter Crispy
  • 13,388 comments
  • 1,339,760 views
I won't comment on something I don't know for sure, but I can tell you DSD has been working on this for quite a while. It's also has almost double the functions at a much lower price. You can buy a single side as well, you don't have to buy both sides. $125 for one side with free shipping, so $250 US for both vs ~$400 US for the SRH dash.

I haven't had my hands on the SRH dash, but the DSD was the clear choice for me, better value for the money and still excellent quality.

True, I have been eyeing the SRH dash (iirc, the price to get the SRH unit here in the north america is ~$425 total), but the price and shipping have stopped me from 'pulling the trigger.' the DSD design of sepearate units and lower price have piqued my interest.
:)
 
I think My CSW motors are shot. :grumpy: The FF in game just doesnt feel as strong as it did a few days ago. Not sure when it happened. I didnt notice any difference the last time I raced, took a few days off and today the wheel just dont feel right. Its not smooth when I turn the wheel against the FF and I get a large lump like feeling at a certain spot when turning the wheel. Anything I can do to be sure its the motors and not just me? Thanks for any help.
 
I think My CSW motors are shot. :grumpy: The FF in game just doesnt feel as strong as it did a few days ago. Not sure when it happened. I didnt notice any difference the last time I raced, took a few days off and today the wheel just dont feel right. Its not smooth when I turn the wheel against the FF and I get a large lump like feeling at a certain spot when turning the wheel. Anything I can do to be sure its the motors and not just me? Thanks for any help.

A fish scale test against a steering angle stop (such as Sens set to 90)should show about 12 pounds when hooked at a spoke at the rim ID for a CSR-E sized wheel. With a CSW just convert that to about 4 lb-ft at your test distance. Also try varying some of the wheel settings. There should not be lumps in certain spots. But things like dead zone and linearity etc can give some of that effect as you move off center if not set very well.
 
Dont have a fish scale, but Im 99% positive I have a bad motor. Jumped in the vette on iracing and the wheel feels dead. I can feel the FF, but it is way to weak compared to what it used to be. Plus the wheel when set to SEN. 90 and I turn the wheel against the FF it isnt smooth. Sent off the email so will see how it goes. Hopefully all goes well.
 
Dont have a fish scale, but Im 99% positive I have a bad motor. Jumped in the vette on iracing and the wheel feels dead. I can feel the FF, but it is way to weak compared to what it used to be. Plus the wheel when set to SEN. 90 and I turn the wheel against the FF it isnt smooth. Sent off the email so will see how it goes. Hopefully all goes well.

Yes it is hard to explain but that has happen to me twice now, sent my wheel back monday for the 2nd time, first base lasted me like a month. They will probably ask you to do the tests but it may not show it but you as a user can tell something is bad.
 
Dont have a fish scale, but Im 99% positive I have a bad motor. Jumped in the vette on iracing and the wheel feels dead. I can feel the FF, but it is way to weak compared to what it used to be. Plus the wheel when set to SEN. 90 and I turn the wheel against the FF it isnt smooth. Sent off the email so will see how it goes. Hopefully all goes well.

Gotcha. If you retain the motors (after getting a new set to install, if you choose that option from them) I may be able to get them going again for you. Then you'll have a spare set.
 
Cool will see what they say. If they give the option to fix it myself that will be the way I go.

Yeah first thing I'd try with loose "dead" motors is to clean the brush/commutators. If you have a motor that is alive/dead/alive/dead as it turns, that is the likely issue.

I have cleaned a few of these motors by running them at low voltage while submerged in water/alcohol. Heat shield and flux shield removed so that the vents in the can are exposed. About 5 minutes in each direction. All sorts of black debris comes out…and then the motor runs better. If the motor(s) is/are too far gone then this won't work. The commutators would then need to be turned on a lathe. That is easy to do, however it is hard to open the motors without destruction.

When you get you new motors, try turning them by hand and listening to them up close. My CSR-E (new in January) would squeak. This turned out to be the new brushes. I ran them for a few days and this did not help. It would eventually go away though, I know this from experience.

Rather than waiting I broke them in under water (out of the wheel base LOL). Voila, silence. The water helps clear brush debris as it forms. And a wet sanding effect takes place leading to smooth brush to commutator contact. I'd consider doing this if your new motors squeak and this bothers you.
 
If I were you fatkrakr, I'd do the water break-in even on the new motors. I ran one without break-in on a power supply and it ran like crap until I did the water break-in. It could help your new motors last longer and will definitely make them smoother. See this thread:

https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/showthread.php?t=274631&page=11

I use reverse osmosis water for mine just to be safe, if you have high mineral content water you can mess up your brushes. Deionized or distilled will also work. Just dry them out using a hair dryer or similar when finished and then re-oil the shaft at the bushings.
 
I have been watching these threads with great interest- especially the modders one.

I would definitely look at breaking in my new motors (and even try to fix my dead ones) using the "water" method, but think maybe a video of how to do it is required for the average user. Eg. I have no experience with motors, and submersing them in water sounds totally wrong lol

Also, seeing exactly which part to oil etc would be great.
 
I have been watching these threads with close interest- especially the modders one.

I would definitely look at breaking in my new motors (and even try to fix my dead ones) using the "water" method, but think maybe a video of how to do it is required for the average user. Eg. I have no experience with motors, and submersing them in water sounds totally wrong lol

Also, seeing exactly which part to oil etc would be great.

This was pretty much my thinking also. Im all for make the motors last as long as possible, but running them in water is above my level of knowledge.
 
I have been watching these threads with great interest- especially the modders one.

I would definitely look at breaking in my new motors (and even try to fix my dead ones) using the "water" method, but think maybe a video of how to do it is required for the average user. Eg. I have no experience with motors, and submersing them in water sounds totally wrong lol

Also, seeing exactly which part to oil etc would be great.

+1:tup:
 
Thank you Logiforce, just a question?
What would the issue be just to plug the motor to a battery, let us say 12 volts battery for example.

Why is there a need to break in these motors for a wheel application? In RC racing racers broke in Mabuchi motors because the brushes inside were in the shape of a "C" as it touched the commutator. The more contact patch you can place on the "comm" the more torque and RPM you may get. The downside to this practice is motor longevity. As a R/C racer who cares. You want to win, but aren't sim racers looking for reliability and longevity?

I can't wait till there's a wheel released on the market with brushless motor technology. In RC racing it has solved so many issues...at a price though :)
 
Cote you could do that but it takes much longer and the debris doesn't get cleaned out like the water method does.

Break-in is necessary to seat the brushes properly and make sure full contact with the commutator is obtained. If done right it won't reduce life of the motor, quite the inverse actually in the case of these motors. The uneven brush contact when new under high current/torque might be part of the wear problem. Break-in allows current to be evenly applied across the full surface of the brush so under high current/torque situations one doesn't unevenly wear the brushes and comm. it can also reduce heat.
 
Last edited:
FMW
Why is there a need to break in these motors for a wheel application? In RC racing racers broke in Mabuchi motors because the brushes inside were in the shape of a "C" as it touched the commutator. The more contact patch you can place on the "comm" the more torque and RPM you may get. The downside to this practice is motor longevity. As a R/C racer who cares. You want to win, but aren't sim racers looking for reliability and longevity?

I can't wait till there's a wheel released on the market with brushless motor technology. In RC racing it has solved so many issues...at a price though :)

Mabuchi brushes have three prongs on them. They ride against a smallish diameter commutator. Brand new, some like mine squeak at first. By breaking the motors in, the brushes "mate" with the commutator. So that they better fit one another and develop compatible wear characteristics. This helps the signal sent to the motor better result in the desired wheel reaction. It helps motor life, not hurts it.

Brushless sim wheel motors could be done, sure. But BL motors are sometimes unhappy at the 0 to very low RPM ranges our wheel motors use. And of course the controllers are completely different. Often a BL motor has less from-0-RPM torque than a brushed motor, and it may not behave equally in both directions. So there would need to be a development effort and the motor sizing for instance might need to be a bit larger and some low-cogging changes made.
 
Cote you could do that but it takes much longer and the debris doesn't get cleaned out like the water method does.

Break-in is necessary to seat the brushes properly and make sure full contact with the commutator is obtained. If done right it won't reduce life of the motor, quite the inverse actually in the case of these motors. The uneven brush contact when new under high current/torque might be part of the wear problem. Break-in allows current to be evenly applied across the full surface of the brush so under high current/torque situations one doesn't unevenly wear the brushes and comm. it can also reduce heat.

EK, sorry I was unclear, I agree the motor need to go in the water, but can it be connected directly to a battery or do we also need what is shown in the video ?
 
Ahh, sorry. My mistake. You can connect it to a battery, but if there is any problem you get a self-destruct pretty rapidly. The point of doing it the way he did was to limit the amperage delivered to the motor in case of an uh-oh. Especially when using a dirty used or oily motor you can add to the conductivity of the water and cause a problem. If you use a new motor in reverse osmosis or distilled/deionized water you should be ok. I also didn't let it run for 20 minutes. I used my bench power supply and just slowly turned up the voltage. I started at 6v for 1 min. then 12, 24, 30, 36 for ~30 seconds each. I only ran mine for about 3 minutes, but also in both directions for 6 minutes total.

Even running on a battery at set voltage you will get most if not all of the benefit. Do run both directions though. I'd recommend running at 12V if you don't have variable voltage capability.
 
Also note that the video involves RC motors. They use fewer turns of larger diameter wire for their coils. Which leads to much greater current flow, especially as any load is added. By comparison the high wind / thin wire motors sim wheels run are much, much safer to run under water. They draw less current, in inherently as they have much greater electrical resistance . And they don't get as dirty or oily as RC motors. The reason different coil winds are used for sim wheels is to optimize them for low RPM torque instead of high RPM zap.
 
Mabuchi brushes have three prongs on them. They ride against a smallish diameter commutator. Brand new, some like mine squeak at first. By breaking the motors in, the brushes "mate" with the commutator. So that they better fit one another and develop compatible wear characteristics. This helps the signal sent to the motor better result in the desired wheel reaction. It helps motor life, not hurts it.

Brushless sim wheel motors could be done, sure. But BL motors are sometimes unhappy at the 0 to very low RPM ranges our wheel motors use. And of course the controllers are completely different. Often a BL motor has less from-0-RPM torque than a brushed motor, and it may not behave equally in both directions. So there would need to be a development effort and the motor sizing for instance might need to be a bit larger and some low-cogging changes made.

The brushless motors and ESC's (controllers) we're using in RC right now have sensors to control forward and reverse. Sensored BL motors also have a much better RPM control at low voltage input. However, these ESC and motors alone cost more. In any case, I see what you mean. The sim wheel application is very different. Maybe a RC ESC company can help figure it out someday :)
 
Recieved a reply from Fanatec this morning about my CSW. They gave me the choice to recieve the motorblock and replace them myself or send the wheel to be repaired. I opted to fix it myself. Not very happy about the CSW failing, but the response time and how they are handling it so far, I cant ask for more.

Quick question for you guys, how will I know if I need to reverse the wires on the new motors or not? Can I just look at the old one and know? Thanks for the help.
 
Recieved a reply from Fanatec this morning about my CSW. They gave me the choice to recieve the motorblock and replace them myself or send the wheel to be repaired. I opted to fix it myself. Not very happy about the CSW failing, but the response time and how they are handling it so far, I cant ask for more.

Quick question for you guys, how will I know if I need to reverse the wires on the new motors or not? Can I just look at the old one and know? Thanks for the help.

Yes you can just look at the old motor wire connections to confirm the connections.
 
Fantatec RennSport Cockpit V2 now available.



Features

Full customization is made possible: wide range of seats and accessories available
Plethora of adjustments to achieve the best driving position
Super solid full aluminum construction in roll cage design
High quality materials for durability
Powder coat finish for extra resistance
Easy to mount
All tools for assembly included
Compatible with most of racing devices on the market
Sporty design

Compatibility

Racing Wheels
All Fanatec wheels
Logitech G25 / G27
Thrustmaster T500RS
Pedals
Fanatec CSR, CSR Elite and ClubSport Pedale
Logitech G25 /G27
Thrustmaster T500RS
Shifters (with optional adapter)
Fanatec ClubSport, CSR and Porsche shifters
Logitech G25/G27
Thrustmaster
Optional accessories (mount accessories section)
Triple Monitor Stand
Single Monitor Stand
Shifter Holder
Sound Holder
Sparco R333 Seat
Sparco Pro 2000 Seat
Fanatec RS Seat
Other accessories coming soon
Keyboard Holder
Butterkick
Handbrake
Height adjuster for pedals

Special Notes

Use the products configurator to build your perfect racing rig
Shipment from our German warehouse
Customers are responsible for any tax and duties imposed by their country
Not included: Racing wheel, pedals, monitor stand, keyboard holder, monitors, console / PC, speakers
The RSC Cockpit V2 has the following measurements when built up completely:
Length: 175 cm (max.)
Width: 84 cm
Height (without seat - max.): 80 cm
Height (with seat - max.): 120cm

Packaging Details

Size (L x W x H) : 115.00cm x 54.00cm x 54.00cm
Weight: 30.00kg
Volume weight: 67.07kg

What's included

RennSport Cockpit V2
Tools and screws to assembly
Manual

Pictures:

cockpit_01big-1000x666.jpg
cockpit_03-1000x666.jpg
CockpitV2_05.png
CockpitV2_03-1000x666.png
*Base

Seat options:

Fanatec RS Seat
Fanatec%20Seat-1000x666.png


Fanatec Sparco Pro 2000 Seat
Seat-PRO2000-Black-1000x666.png


Fanatec Sparco R333 Seat
Sparco-Seat-R333_02-1000x666.png
(Nice!)

Accessories

Sound Holder
Sound-Front-1000x666.png


Single Monitor Mount
1M-back-1000x666.png


Triple Monitor Mount
3M-back-1000x666.png


Shifter Holder
front-1000x666.png

Prices (USD)

Base Frame
RennSport Cockpit V2: $999

Seats:
Fanatec RS Seat: $199
Fanatec Sparco Pro 2000 Seat: $469
Fanatec Sparco R333 Seat: $419

Accessories:
RennSport Cockpit Single Monitor Stand V2: $249.00
RennSport Cockpit Triple Monitor Stand V2 $249.00
RennSport Cockpit Shifter Holder $49.95
RennSport Cockpit Sound Holder $34.95
 
Last edited:
I remember when I got my Recaro SPGs for my M3. Had to get my waist size back below 32 inches. So my reward was a set of those seats. I wonder what size people would feel comfortable in the different seat options. Some Americans are…err...super sized yet still fast racers.
 
Back