- 595
- Detroit, MI
- toolo4sno
Now we have 2 Awesome WC Videos.
The Video from Sweet is our official Season3 Intro.
Big Thanks Sweet and Alonso.
When it rains it pours.
Great video.
Now we have 2 Awesome WC Videos.
The Video from Sweet is our official Season3 Intro.
Big Thanks Sweet and Alonso.
Rumors are true. Tire wear is much more realistic in terms of degradation.
Hey guys, just did some quick 2.07 vs 2.08 testing with a race tuned full down force F10. With the update the F10 is 2.4 mph slower top speed but about .1 quicker 0-100. During the top speed test my F10 was bouncing off the rev limiter early with 2.07 but could not pull to the limiter in 2.08.
For anyone who cares, a race tuned (for indy road) full downforce x2011 lost 28 mph and the x2010 lost 24 mph.
Obviously serious retuning is required.
I vote
Rome:1
SSR5:4
Laguna Seca:1 000 000 000
Just Kidding:
I vote
Rome:1
SSR5:4
Laguna Seca:2
People, please just copy the last updated vote and add yours instead of just stating which track you want, it makes it easier to see the votes. I have already added Dahlzi's vote for SSR5 before i added mine for Laguna.
Yes, even after you quouted what i said is difficult to keep tabs, you still do it *SIGHS*I vote for laguna and rome if i can? if just one then rome
Exactly my point.I dont know now how many votes for the tracks now.
I was wondering if someone would have that reaction. It does kind of build up the excitment and then end.
My vote (Laguna Seca)
I vote
Rome:1
SSR5:4
Laguna Seca:3
You can vote for both no bull.
Guys this is from the news page in one of the posts. Tyres are unaffected acording to this.
Rate of tire wear in endurance races has been slowed (excluding formula cars).
Amount of air resistance change when altering aerodynamic wing settings has been increased.
If thats true then we only have to worry about the 'air resistance change'
That other surface is cobblestone.
Hey guys, just did some quick 2.07 vs 2.08 testing with a race tuned full down force F10. With the update the F10 is 2.4 mph slower top speed but about .1 quicker 0-100. During the top speed test my F10 was bouncing off the rev limiter early with 2.07 but could not pull to the limiter in 2.08.
For anyone who cares, a race tuned (for indy road) full downforce x2011 lost 28 mph and the x2010 lost 24 mph.
Obviously serious retuning is required.
I went to Monza, I could hit 217mph with minimum downforce, and only 192mph with full downforce but my lap times were still faster with full downforce. Maybe there's another setting that's most advantageous besides max downforce because nobody runs full downforce at monza in real life
IMMORTALPILOTJoe join our league again pls.
I would enjoy racing with you guys again but weekends have been busy all summer and it's not slowing down for another 2 weeks. I think I mentioned before that I have 3 kids in competitive soccer and 1 starting hockey. Evenings are the only chance I currently have for racing. Will look ar it after Canadian Thanksgiving weekend and hopefully I can still join.
That first season was awesome and I do need to get back.
On another note, did a race today with the F2007 and it felt horrible, very arcade like and not a pleasure to drive at all. Hopefully the F10 still feels like a real car.
I'm sure there are multiple reasons for this, but I suspect the risk of crashing or death has something to do with it. You're more likely to go balls to the wall into a turn in a game where you aren't fearful of wrecking the car or dying. Consistency without being on the lethal limit is more important in real life. That and they have large teams of the world's best engineers putting together the setup so they can have a stable car with less downforce. Including setup options we don't have access to in GT5. Just a guess but that's my guess.
join my league m8 we race on wednesday night
Yes you guys should.
I had FUN just practicing unlike the Ferrari's.
Jumped into practice and immediately was a good bit faster than killa
Londons an epic fun street course.