- 5,684
- Ohio
If her time trial results are any gauge to go by, I guarantee she's a SRF hack.
... pretty sure "she" uses SRF too ...
If her time trial results are any gauge to go by, I guarantee she's a SRF hack.
Definitely an SRF user ...
Mods must have removed it (my post in that thread is gone from my history). At a guess I'd say because it was off topic for that section. Same fella has made these accusations before under 3 different profiles (and still is) in the FGT series forums. He gets all butt hurt because he can't keep up. One of my friends that races in the series rang me today and told me of his bad behavior (driving backwards) during their race meeting. Must be frustrating for them with this guy constantly trolling them.👎Can anyone estimate what happened to that thread about someone hacking DF ( Online Racing section ) ?
Did it disappear because of 'Don't name and shame' ?
For reference, first try out. Merc 1.39.5xx, 5.03.xxx overall if you guys try
Mods must have removed it (my post in that thread is gone from my history). At a guess I'd say because it was off topic for that section. Same fella has made these accusations before under 3 different profiles (and still is) in the FGT series forums. He gets all butt hurt because he can't keep up. One of my friends that races in the series rang me today and told me of his bad behavior (driving backwards) during their race meeting. Must be frustrating for them with this guy constantly trolling them.👎
It's definitely trolling when he deliberately forms new profiles with the sole intend of getting back in their series only to disrupt the racing.It's a serious accusation and regarding circumstances it might look like trolling. Nevertheless he could be right.
Will there be an investigation in any form ?
It's definitely trolling when he deliberately forms new profiles with the sole intend of getting back in their series only to disrupt the racing.
I think if he had proof he would have produced it by now. He just quotes numbers that really don't mean anything without proper context. It's very easy to just post numbers and acuse someone. No investigation will happen as its not this forums place, rather a job for PD and Sony, as it's their rules that would be broken, and then only if it is reported to them. In this forum the onus is on him to prove his claims......or be banned...... again
We probably should move to a private message if you want to know more.
If her time trial results are any gauge to go by, I guarantee she's a SRF hack.
She's another of those who doesn't like it if she's not winning, and then sets about destroying everybody else's race.....You're all right about assenaV with the SRF but I wouldn't put too much emphasis on time trial results for how fast she really is/isn't. Some of us find them to be a chore rather than enjoyable.
Personally, I've not had any trouble with her but with the SRF, she always gets an easy pass from me anyway. I've seen what she's capable of though. Not pretty.
... I just ran a 04.67
👍Guess I will after the last side of this new Queens of The Stone Age record is over. Great album.
Anyone doing the Mazda QM? I ran a couple (or 3) races earlier and started doing low 46's but I haven't met a fast driver there yet so I've no idea what to aim for.
I spent 45 minutes trying to get in at Bathurst yesterday. Denied. Turned it off and went back to listening to records... Didn't even get the warm up option. 👎
If I'm eligible ... PB is 46.0, so you could aim for 45.9 maybe . I've as well only done a few races.
With that time you should clearly run ahead of the field ( if you don't get canned in ), most of them do
1.48 as best ... or slower of course 👍.
I moved the ballast to 35 (or was it -35...) for a 51-49 split and I could push a lot harder.
I have to admit I'm too inconsistent with the Megane. One race I'm running in 2.08+, with confident to gain time in some sectors, and then I lost totally the feeling of what the car is doing. it's very uncomfortable. And I cannot mention here my lap times, so bad they are :-)))
I'm using Kim's tune (thanks to you Kim). I have tried some adjustment, but nothing helpful. The problem I have it's when I optimise the tune for the straight and fast sectors, I cannot handle the car in the technical sector (tires comes too hot). Same result with the reverse option.
I do believe it's not only the tune. You guys are very good GT drivers, adopting the right behaviour for any situation. As joey (Aussie understand me) GT driver, like I am, it's difficult to follow you ;-)
👍
I started this race with the setup from Brands, thought it should fit here as well, and it worked ok, but I had to be very careful with the car.
Then @Kim Nielsen came up with his ... and during the first laps I thought "Ho, what is that ?" As soon as I'd gotten used to it, it came clear
that it's a very good compromise to get the best overall performance and laptime. The twitchyness the other tune showed here on the Mountain had mostly gone and driving was more comfortable and thus faster.
If your problem is burning tires ( isn't that a circumscription for one of our track heroes ? ), I assume it's when exiting slower corners like
Hell's Corner, Cutting, after the Dipper, Forest Elbow ... right ?
Though I've learned a lot by playing GT, I'm by far no expert, but I would suggest as follows ( and pls everybody, correct me if wrong ) :
Stay as calm as possible when approaching the corner. Be done with braking so that you can apply a little throttle while turning or at the
apex - should keep the car stable. Take care of your steering, don't forget to open - and apply throttle slowly when the car is settled for
the direction to go.
You didn't want to mention your slower laptimes, but the loss of time is just logic. If you really mess up one corner like The Cutting, your
lap is gone, if you mess up two on such a long track, you lose endless seconds.
Keep practising - I know your talented 👍 !