FITT - Federation of International Tuners and Test-Drivers
- Thread starter DigitalBaka
- 2,660 comments
- 166,416 views
- 4,016
- New Jersey
- crash27wwjd
I'm assuming you have done preliminary testing? Might be interesting, but myself, I would prefer SM.
- 3,867
- Saltash
- Dolhaus
Just running a few laps now, at the moment the only criteria are V8 at the front, four doors in the middle and drive at the back
- 4,016
- New Jersey
- crash27wwjd
- 3,867
- Saltash
- Dolhaus
There are a few other options should I need to swap cars out, just trying not to mix premiums and standards
The ISF is a rare Japanese V8, not a popular configuration it seems
- 4,016
- New Jersey
- crash27wwjd
- 4,803
- Dearborn, MI
- MotorCtyHamilton
Ooops. Wrong thread.
- 5,489
- mid west USA
- Otaliema
Had an idea for a off beat challenge, that should be fun. Just want to check interest in it.
A variable PP challenge. One car one track. 100(still up for debate) PP range for the car. Range would be in the 400-550 ish range, most popular area I think anyways.
The idea would be to tune to the car to handle the track at any PP setting, with different power parts and ballast amounts. *Ballast position would stay the same whether it's 0 or 200 kg*
The only setting allowed to be changed on the tune would be the final drive to allow adjustments for changes in the power levels.
Each tester would be assigned a different PP to test in private, the assignment would include parts and ballast amount to use to reach the PP.
My idea behind this is to test the ability of a tune to adapt to different races in the game, so you could say take one car for all of the seasonals, provided i meets the regs of course. But you get the idea.
A variable PP challenge. One car one track. 100(still up for debate) PP range for the car. Range would be in the 400-550 ish range, most popular area I think anyways.
The idea would be to tune to the car to handle the track at any PP setting, with different power parts and ballast amounts. *Ballast position would stay the same whether it's 0 or 200 kg*
The only setting allowed to be changed on the tune would be the final drive to allow adjustments for changes in the power levels.
Each tester would be assigned a different PP to test in private, the assignment would include parts and ballast amount to use to reach the PP.
My idea behind this is to test the ability of a tune to adapt to different races in the game, so you could say take one car for all of the seasonals, provided i meets the regs of course. But you get the idea.
- 1,399
- nova iguaçu
- xande1959
big idea .
I personally use a car with the same setup in several different circuits, a Cadillac Cien'02 with 600 PP already have 95 victories, and has rooms that have to put soft sports tire and even hard, but it fits better with the tires soft race.
đź‘Ť
I personally use a car with the same setup in several different circuits, a Cadillac Cien'02 with 600 PP already have 95 victories, and has rooms that have to put soft sports tire and even hard, but it fits better with the tires soft race.
đź‘Ť
- 246
- East Central Illinois
- xx-wydopen-xx
In the time I have been watching (and participating in) FITT threads, I have always wanted to propose a budget challenge. Like 450pp on sports hards with a trans for under a total cost of 60,000 credits on a track like deep forest reverse. You could use any car or maybe limit it to a single drivetrain but spend your money as you see fit as long as it meets those 3 requirements. Parts choices and initial car cost would be crucial as there would not be a lot of money for hop ups after purchasing a car, trans, and tires. This would be a best bang for the buck car challenge.
- 5,633
- Ohio
I like the idea Wydopen however I'm pretty sure one could build a really fast car at 450 PP for $60k. Maybe consider half that?
- 5,489
- mid west USA
- Otaliema
Maybe. Suspension is what 15k trans is 15k. Car is 10-20k that leaves 10k-20k to buy performance upgrades and that would go pretty fast.
