- 1,732
- cuco33
I meant most of them are consistent within themselves. Of course they stand out next to the Premium cars. That was not the point, because of course this point is not really open for discussion (even if, admittedly, while racing the difference isn't *that* visible, bar the lack of cockpit view).
I just meant most Premium are consistent, and most Standard are consistent. The same cannot be said of the Forza 4 car roster. Cars like the F40, some of the older NSXes, the S2000, man they really look bad. And it's not just a matter of super duper accuracy. They just look bad. I dunno, when you look at them, you can tell something is just not right.
And not, I'm not one of those freaks that can tell there's a two millimeter difference between the turn signal and the wheel arch. Some models are just painful to look at. Fortunately they are far from being the majority, but they still exist and are way too numerous for my tastes.
I won't even go into the many cockpit glitches like reversed mirrors and biased gauges, because admittedly most GT5 and FM4 dashboard are now basically unreadable during racing due to overdone HDR, and camera positioning. So that's a moot point.
And just to be clear, the whole Standard situation is in my opinion one of the biggest fiasco in video games history. Still, all GT5 premium all look shockingly good, and the same cannot be said of all FM4 models, even if, yes, I'm aware there more than twice cars in FM4 than there are premiums in GT5.
Even if I think that FM4 is a great game (and have stated it numerous times that FM3 is one of the greatest game I've ever played, right beside FM2), and think that GT5 is a bad game, I just can't ignore the fact that the overall quality of car modeling is far from being one of the strong point of the Forza series, whereas GT5 car modeling is top notch, even if Standard cars shouldn't have been included in that game in the first place.
This:
is what you see when racing in the Lupo cup. The jaggies in the rear hatch are noticed as you drive by them. Then some standards are done pretty decent lacking any major eye soar like these jaggies. Then the premium cars don't have any of these issues because they simply look stunning. Consistency... GT5 does not have.
Standard cars go from looking pretty good for being ports to just god awful. I've grown a passion for taking pics of cars during races and other modes, probably because I'm also an amateur photographer who loves cars and goes to motorsport and auto/enthusiast show events. When a car I like in GT5 is a standard, most of the times the issues in the models are just apparent and stick out badly.
What is it about the cars you mentioned that look bad? I keep reading, not just on here but on other boards, that some models look bad and no one really explains why. Just simply 'they look bad'. I'm not attacking nor defending. I'm interested in seeing the praises and the faults in both games and their models.
With all that said, when the stars are all aligned meaning premium cars in phototravel modes/'premium' tracks.. GT5 still looks better, looks photorealistic at times and the premium car models are modeled better with more detail. It's been said way too often but the standards are what take away from the premiums.