Ford planning LeMans Return + Ford GT revival

  • Thread starter Slash
  • 824 comments
  • 74,529 views
The diffuser is as aggressive as it is because aero is huge in Le Mans. The Mulsanne straight is where seconds can be gained or lost so low drag is desired. On the other hand, the last 1/4 of the track (Porsche curves) and the chicanes that punctuate the Mulsanne straight punish poor corner exit, so rear grip is desired.

The straights are why we don't see massive wings. The curves are why the teams still want low speed downforce. Normally downforce = drag so a balance must be achieved.

Diffusers are great because they provide good downforce with comparatively little drag. A wing with the same downforce would slow the car on the Mulsanne. Ford is trying to plant the rear tires through those chicanes and the Porsche curves while staying slippery for the straight. Smart move.
 
The diffuser is as aggressive as it is because aero is huge in Le Mans. The Mulsanne straight is where seconds can be gained or lost so low drag is desired. On the other hand, the last 1/4 of the track (Porsche curves) and the chicanes that punctuate the Mulsanne straight punish poor corner exit, so rear grip is desired.

The straights are why we don't see massive wings. The curves are why the teams still want low speed downforce. Normally downforce = drag so a balance must be achieved.

Diffusers are great because they provide good downforce with comparatively little drag. A wing with the same downforce would slow the car on the Mulsanne. Ford is trying to plant the rear tires through those chicanes and the Porsche curves while staying slippery for the straight. Smart move.

I wonder what would happen if they opened up the Mulsanne again? I feel like high downforce would still be very critical as half the track is high speed corners, so I doubt the speeds on the big straight would be too much higher than they are now. I would love to see a full Mulsanne again.
 
I wonder what would happen if they opened up the Mulsanne again? I feel like high downforce would still be very critical as half the track is high speed corners, so I doubt the speeds on the big straight would be too much higher than they are now. I would love to see a full Mulsanne again.
I think it could be more a thing of safety. That long a straight at the speeds those cars could reach would be insane.
 
I think it could be more a thing of safety. That long a straight at the speeds those cars could reach would be insane.

Well the LMP1 cars sure are extremely powerful, probably more powerful than C1 was back in the 80s. But they also have a LOT more downforce and drag. A C1 would be faster in top end I think. So if LMP1 couldn't exceed 215mph or so, then I don't see how it would be more dangerous than it is now.
 
Well the LMP1 cars sure are extremely powerful, probably more powerful than C1 was back in the 80s. But they also have a LOT more downforce and drag. A C1 would be faster in top end I think. So if LMP1 couldn't exceed 215mph or so, then I don't see how it would be more dangerous than it is now.
But imagine a collision between two cars going 215MPH.
 
I wonder what would happen if they opened up the Mulsanne again? I feel like high downforce would still be very critical as half the track is high speed corners, so I doubt the speeds on the big straight would be too much higher than they are now. I would love to see a full Mulsanne again.

I think the two chicanes in the Mulsanne are almost as important as the entire high speed section at the end of the track. Anytime someone hits traffic or messes up a corner exit at the chicanes they get left in the dust on the straight. If the chicanes were removed I think a big motivator for downforce would be gone. I wouldn't be surprised if wings came off some LMP1 cars.
 
My argument is that they are already doing that kind of speed. It might actually be safer if it was just a straight without the two major braking zones to cause the cars to bunch up.
Also, think about the teams trying to give cars less drag and perhaps trying to get their cars closer to 250MPH if the chicanes were removed.
 
I suppose that would likely happen. It would still be awesome to see a full Mulsanne at the 24 hours.
Remember those GT1 cars of the late 90's? Especially the CLK GTR, those things hit 240MPH! I get there are probably power and weight restrictors on the cars now (The GT1 cars had 650HP) but it would be easy for manufacturers to get carried away.
 
CLRflip2.jpg


Without chicanes the speeds are higher and accidents like this become even worse. As it is, spectating along Mulsanne is almost totally forbidden due to the high risk of death in case of an accident.
 
CLRflip2.jpg


Without chicanes the speeds are higher and accidents like this become even worse. As it is, spectating along Mulsanne is almost totally forbidden due to the high risk of death in case of an accident.
This is the kind of thing that shouldn't happen again at LeMans. The chicanes must stay...
 
Without chicanes the speeds are higher and accidents like this become even worse. As it is, spectating along Mulsanne is almost totally forbidden due to the high risk of death in case of an accident.
Or we can have the teams require to create a car with more downforce and innovate in the aerodynamic category.

But the chicane way is definitely safer.
 
Having the full straight doesn't necessarily mean the cars have to do full speed. Rules are powerful. You could require the cars to basically drive around with airbrakes on, which would slow them down and also provide good defense against lifting off the track. Unlike wings, large billboard spoilers can work forwards and backwards. They would greatly increase turbulence, though they may take less of a performance hit than more efficient aero devices and you'll also tend to disrupt the natural lift that occurs over the driver's compartment.
 
If the 917 could do 240mph in the 1970's while aerodynamics was still witchcraft, modern engineers can probably handle the Mulsanne straight today.

Personally I like the chicanes.
I agree. 👍 It adds some zing to the circuit. Plus by the time you reach them you're going pretty bloody quick anyway. About 210mph in an LMP1 and about 190mph in a GTE.
 
Also, think about the teams trying to give cars less drag and perhaps trying to get their cars closer to 250MPH if the chicanes were removed.
That can't physically happen.
CLRflip2.jpg


Without chicanes the speeds are higher and accidents like this become even worse. As it is, spectating along Mulsanne is almost totally forbidden due to the high risk of death in case of an accident.
The CLR and one Porsche flip was due to the inherent stagnation pressure in GT1 cars at the time, because they put so much into the rake angle. That cars are a lot different now, not including the massive holes they have that allow them to alleviate any pressure that would cause such a flip.
Especially the CLK GTR, those things hit 240MPH!
They really, really couldn't.
This is the kind of thing that shouldn't happen again at LeMans. The chicanes must stay...
I like the chicanes, but they don't make top speeds any lower. All P1s essentially top out between each one.
 
Put it this way: without chicanes, speeds would be faster. If speeds are faster, accidents become worse. It's as simple as that.
 
But as I said, the P1s top out between each chicane anyway, give or take 2/3mph. You would have no bigger accident than is possible today, and it wouldn't be an issue of taking off, rather getting tagged into the wall by a GT or P2 as you went in to approach Mulsanne. At 180mph (GTE or P2) or 210mph (P1), it'll hurt either way.
 
Put it this way: without chicanes, speeds would be faster. If speeds are faster, accidents become worse. It's as simple as that.
The gearing of the P1's maxes out at the chicanes, while they were originally for speed reduction, they're now adding zing to that part of the circuit. Take out the chicanes and they'd be on the rev limiter the whole way.
 
The gearing of the P1's maxes out at the chicanes, while they were originally for speed reduction, they're now adding zing to that part of the circuit. Take out the chicanes and they'd be on the rev limiter the whole way.

They might add some zing in terms of two additional brake/acceleration zones, but they also take a way a LOT of zing by eliminating the Mulsanne kink, which was an incredible corner. The long straight is a thing of the past. Only the Nurburgring's is left. :(
 
They might add some zing in terms of two additional brake/acceleration zones, but they also take a way a LOT of zing by eliminating the Mulsanne kink, which was an incredible corner. The long straight is a thing of the past. Only the Nurburgring's is left. :(
True, but in retrospect it's been gone since the late 70's so it's not like it's been a recent thing. And at the same time, the Ring's top class ATM is GT3, and since GT's are geared with only a 180mph (roughly) top speed it's not in danger of being broken up. Plus it has a massive run up a hill. :P
 
True, but in retrospect it's been gone since the late 70's so it's not like it's been a recent thing. And at the same time, the Ring's top class ATM is GT3, and since GT's are geared with only a 180mph (roughly) top speed it's not in danger of being broken up. Plus it has a massive run up a hill. :P

The kink was still around in 1989
 
Alright but still. It's been a long time.

I mean, the corner is still physically there, it's just that it's more or less part of the second chicane, so it's not really a kink anymore.

edit: I think this is probably too much discussion that's only tenuously related to the Ford GT.
 
Last edited:
Ford GT concept shown at the Detroit Auto Show having problems starting up. Obviously, it's only a concept so it doesn't matter if it has these problems, but its still cool to see it out and about.

 
Back