Formula 1 Etihad Airways Abu Dhabi Grand Prix 2021Formula 1 

  • Thread starter Jimlaad43
  • 1,964 comments
  • 96,339 views

Who will win the Driver's Championship?


  • Total voters
    73
  • Poll closed .
Kind of funny since Latifi's parents own Saputo Dairies and Sofina Foods (both huge conglomerates here in Canada). He could literally give them for free milk and salami for life in return. So people taking it seriously must believe he's a real penny pincher. :lol:
They have to really good salami, I would take that W.
 
Nobody wanted to see finish behind safety car. So Race Director decided and it looks like he have the right to do so.





"A document released by the FIA on Sunday night read: "Article 15.3 allows the Race Director to control the use of the safety car, which in our determination includes its deployment and withdrawal.


"Although Article 48.12 may not have been applied fully, in relation to the safety car returning to the pits at the end of the following lap, Article 48.13 overrides that and once the message 'Safety Car in this lap' has been displayed, it is mandatory to withdraw the safety car at the end of that lap.

"That notwithstanding Mercedes’ request that the Stewards remediate the matter by amending the classification to reflect the positions at the end of the penultimate lap, this is a step that the Stewards believe is effectively shortening the race retrospectively, and hence not appropriate.

"Accordingly, the Protest is dismissed.""
Maybe it's just me but reading FIA's justification, to me it reads," Masi can control the deployment of the safety car and play around with the regulations to influence the end result of a race" because that's exactly what happened here regardless of how they position it. I'm on the camp that if they didn't want the biggest race of the season to finish under the safety car, they should have red flagged the race and give us a restart. All of this nonsense could have been avoided!
 
Nobody wanted to see finish behind safety car
I'm sure plenty of people did. I personally wouldn't have minded, it wouldn't have changed anything from before the SC, race was over. It's not like VER was on the brink of overtaking and got stopped by the SC and there would have been some huge miscarriage of justice if the positions when LAT hit the wall were taken as final.

Sure it would have been anticlimactic but like I said, you can't force excitement. If the race ends as a damp squib, then so be it.

The clue is in the name as to the purpose of the safety car. It's not supposed to be used a tool to spice up the race, even if some disruption is unavoidable.
 
Last edited:
I’m not saying the decisions were right. I’m merely arguing against the notion that somehow the championship is undeserved. Once again, most race wins, most laps led, longest time in championship lead, most podiums. Can’t just scrap off the previous 21 races because your favourite driver didn’t win.

So you’re right, you don’t have to be a fan of either driver to know what happened was wrong. But that wasn’t the point I was making, and that wasn’t the point I was fighting.
You have yet to explain why Max deserved it being in second place, and if the regulations were followed, finishing in second place behind Lewis... Lewis was in position to win, being on equal points. You can't just scrap Lewis' accomplishments the prior 21 races either which you appear to be doing.

Max had not done enough to win the WDC without having to beat Lewis in Abu Dhabi, it's as simple as that.
 
Start a rumor that Perez intentionally parked it so that Sainz could get podium. Oops.

I mean.... there still is no reason for Perez' retirement. And without him retiring, Sainz would have been stuck behind lapped traffic and third place.. Giving Ferrari a reason to protest the idea of only allowing the lapped cars between Max and Lewis to pass...
 
Last edited:
Start a rumor that Perez intentionally parked it so that Sainz could get podium. Oops.
I think it's more likely that Red Bull underfuelled him to make sure he would be able to get in Lewis' way around the pitstop window, so the sudden retirement without any warning or explanation (officially it's "Oil Pressure") feels a bit fishy.
 
Mercedes already showed their new clothing line 2022.

1639419632336.png
 
Maybe it's just me but reading FIA's justification, to me it reads," Masi can control the deployment of the safety car and play around with the regulations to influence the end result of a race" because that's exactly what happened here regardless of how they position it. I'm on the camp that if they didn't want the biggest race of the season to finish under the safety car, they should have red flagged the race and give us a restart. All of this nonsense could have been avoided!
he did questionable decisions throughout the whole season, nothing new
 
You have yet to explain why Max deserved it being in second place, and if the regulations were followed, finishing in second place behind Lewis... Lewis was in position to win, being on equal points. You can't just scrap Lewis' accomplishments the prior 21 races either which you appear to be doing.

Max had not done enough to win the WDC without having to beat Lewis in Abu Dhabi, it's as simple as that.
I have explained it a couple times, in fact if you go to my pre-race post I also detail there why I felt Max deserved to be WDC before the race weekend even started. Who I feel deserved to win the title is a different question to the one being posed regarding the outcome of the race and how we got there. They're different questions. Also, I'm not scrapping Lewis' accomplishments in the 21 races prior at all. Lets get some facts in terms of how I'm viewing this whole season shall we;

Max:
10 wins
10 poles
18 podiums
652 laps led

Lewis:
8 wins
5 poles
17 podiums
297 laps led

Thereby not scrapping Lewis' achievements, but once again highlighting why I personally felt Max was a worthy champion, regardless of whether I agree with the race directors lack of direction. Put those numbers in front of anyone, and you can't say Max isn't a worthy champion of the sport.

I also refer you to my other earlier post, querying that, even if the FIA hadn't broken their own rules, can we, with absolute certainty say that Lewis would have won? The answer there is a big, fat, no. There is too much unknown about what could have happened to be able to say that with a definitive tone.
 
he did questionable decisions throughout the whole season, nothing new
I know he did but for me that one was on a different level just for the simple fact that he changed the regulations on the fly and by doing so directly influenced the overall result of the biggest race of the season.
 
@MagpieRacer Max does keep driving like a donkey though, particularly when racing Lewis, so given that I'm not sure you can say he deserved the title. Sure he's plenty fast, but he also does dirty divebombs and squeezes all the time. If any of you race a person like that in GTS you'd lose your minds but Max is a worthy champion when he does it?
 
I have explained it a couple times, in fact if you go to my pre-race post I also detail there why I felt Max deserved to be WDC before the race weekend even started. Who I feel deserved to win the title is a different question to the one being posed regarding the outcome of the race and how we got there. They're different questions. Also, I'm not scrapping Lewis' accomplishments in the 21 races prior at all. Lets get some facts in terms of how I'm viewing this whole season shall we;

Max:
10 wins
10 poles
18 podiums
652 laps led

Lewis:
8 wins
5 poles
17 podiums
297 laps led

Thereby not scrapping Lewis' achievements, but once again highlighting why I personally felt Max was a worthy champion, regardless of whether I agree with the race directors lack of direction. Put those numbers in front of anyone, and you can't say Max isn't a worthy champion of the sport.

I also refer you to my other earlier post, querying that, even if the FIA hadn't broken their own rules, can we, with absolute certainty say that Lewis would have won? The answer there is a big, fat, no. There is too much unknown about what could have happened to be able to say that with a definitive tone.


Those prior poles and wins and SPRINT QUALIFYING points were not enough to give him the WDC regardless of your feeling on the matter. He needed to beat lewis and needed help to do it. Those are the facts.

Too much unknown, lol, what are you talking about? If they follow the regulations then Lewis wins under SC. Are you saying Lewis was gonna crash out during the SC? A tire blow up?
 
From what I've been seeing online, there's too much crying from Merc side. I personaly don't agree with the decision on THIS race, but IMO Max could have won this season easily IF rules were applied equally. But thats the FIA for you.

Either way, F1 became very papular this year, which is a good thing for the sport, and I hope Vettel bounce back next year with the new car.
 
Last edited:
Those prior poles and wins and SPRINT QUALIFYING points were not enough to give him the WDC regardless of your feeling on the matter. He needed to beat lewis and needed help to do it. Those are the facts.

Too much unknown, lol, what are you talking about? If they follow the regulations then Lewis wins under SC. Are you saying Lewis was gonna crash out during the SC? A tire blow up?
Who says the race had to end safety car? Can you say with certainty that if they don't clear the lapped cars and restart with them there that Lewis wins? It was ending under greens regardless, which teams have unanimously agreed to do so whenever physically possible.

Scenario 1: The lapped cars are all allowed to pass as per the rules, all cars do so, they go pass and the safety car gets called in, the safety car can be withdrawn at the discretion of race director so can be withdrawn at the end of that lap which supersedes the following lap rule. Verstappen passes Hamilton on the last lap and wins. Timings tighter but it wouldn't have been impossible.

Scenario 2: The lapped cars stay in situe as timing is tight, 5 cars will get blue flags the second the race restarts to due to the gaps, Max will likely have been passed them, probably in to turn 5, absolutely no later than turn 6, giving Max 10 corners to catch and pass Lewis on tyres that were substantially faster, fast enough to offset time loss following a car, most probable area for a move being turns 12-13. It's by not means a given, but it would have been a very serious possibility.

Scenario 3: Less likely due to safety, but instead of the message going out saying lapped cars won't be allowed to pass, the message saying lapped cars can pass goes out, everyone passes almost a lap prior and we get 2 racing laps, with a likely result of Max passing and winning.

Scenario 4: FIA breaks their rule a different way and the lead lap cars are asked to pass the lapped cars to get into the correct positions. This could be done anywhere on circuit due to them not needing to go past the safety car so would have allowed them to get racing sooner, again, the tyre differential likely offering Max an easy pass and run to the finish.

Scenario 5: The race is red flagged after the crash, all drivers can change tyres, it's 50/50 for the win, Lewis likely takes it in this scenario.

In each scenario, it is also possible for Lewis to win, particularly in 2 and 3 (albeit unlikely in 3 due to the tyres).
You can’t just trot out statistics to judge a driver, otherwise you could infer that everyone on the grid besides Max and Lewis is pretty awful.
Can we not? You're saying in a 2 way title fight we can't compare the drivers seasons to decide for ourselves who we think is deserving or worthy? The inference for the other drivers is simply that they weren't in the title fight at the final round..thereby their statistics aren't relevant to this discussion. Statistically, Max Verstappen is the most deserving of the 2 for the championship.
 
IMO Max could have won this season easily IF rules were applied equally
I mean, of all the things that might have helped Verstappen to the title, this is the most not that.


He's faced a single sanction for crowding a car off the road this season, after doing it eight times in total, and that wasn't actually what he got the penalty for (he got the penalties in that race for leaving the track and gaining a lasting advantage, and for causing a collision). There were only 12 instances of cars being crowded off the road this season, and all of the other four got penalties - including Hamilton doing it to him at Silverstone, for which he got 10s (five for all the others) even though the FIA and teams insist that penalties are applied to the action not the consequence. Though it was an ultimately meaningless penalty given the performance in the Mercedes compared to everything else.

In the last seven seasons there have been ten occasions where a car has overtaken another during a safety car period. Nine of those were punished with 5-10s penalties and most with two penalty points, including one where Magnussen briefly overtook Vandoorne and ceded the place back again (5s, two penalty points). I will leave you to guess what the tenth one was.

I can't even conjure up a moment equivalent to the brake check madness, but a mere 10s penalty doesn't seem appropriate. The only two I can think even come close were Maldonado (also on Hamilton) in qualifying at Monaco, which got him a five-place grid drop, and when Schumacher half-tried to take out Villeneuve in a title-decider in 1997 and crippled his own car. That got him disqualified from the entire season, and I'm having a hard time coming up with ways that a 2.4G deceleration in the middle of a straight in a potential title-decider is less bad than that.

And we're not even getting into the rear wing shenanigans, where Red Bull can apparently change theirs every session or so without consequence, but the Mercedes item fails an inspection on one occasion (the FIA saying it was not a deliberate act, either bad fitment or damage) in a performance-detrimental manner, and is confiscated and the driver is disqualified.


IF rules were equally applied, Verstappen would have missed about three races this year through licence point totting-up bans and disqualification. But as we saw on Sunday, if a rule exists to cover a situation, Michael Masi can ignore it. It's like the Rule 34 of motorsport.
 
Last edited:
I have explained it a couple times, in fact if you go to my pre-race post I also detail there why I felt Max deserved to be WDC before the race weekend even started. Who I feel deserved to win the title is a different question to the one being posed regarding the outcome of the race and how we got there. They're different questions. Also, I'm not scrapping Lewis' accomplishments in the 21 races prior at all. Lets get some facts in terms of how I'm viewing this whole season shall we;

Max:
10 wins
10 poles
18 podiums
652 laps led

Lewis:
8 wins
5 poles
17 podiums
297 laps led

Thereby not scrapping Lewis' achievements, but once again highlighting why I personally felt Max was a worthy champion, regardless of whether I agree with the race directors lack of direction. Put those numbers in front of anyone, and you can't say Max isn't a worthy champion of the sport.

I also refer you to my other earlier post, querying that, even if the FIA hadn't broken their own rules, can we, with absolute certainty say that Lewis would have won? The answer there is a big, fat, no. There is too much unknown about what could have happened to be able to say that with a definitive tone.
Two of those wins for Max were gifts from the FIA. Yesterday of course. And Spa, which was not a race no matter how much they want us to believe it was.
 
I mean, of all the things that might have helped Verstappen to the title, this is the most not that.


He's faced a single sanction for crowding a car off the road this season, after doing it eight times in total, and that wasn't actually what he got the penalty for (he got the penalties in that race for leaving the track and gaining a lasting advantage, and for causing a collision). There were only 12 instances of cars being crowded off the road this season, and all of the other four got penalties - including Hamilton doing it to him at Silverstone, for which he got 10s (five for all the others) even though the FIA and teams insist that penalties are applied to the action not the consequence. Though it was an ultimately meaningless penalty given the performance in the Mercedes compared to everything else.

In the last seven seasons there have been ten occasions where a car has overtaken another during a safety car period. Nine of those were punished with 5-10s penalties and most with two penalty points, including one where Magnussen briefly overtook Vandoorne and ceded the place back again (5s, two penalty points). I will leave you to guess what the tenth one was.

I can't even conjure up a moment equivalent to the brake check madness, but a mere 10s penalty doesn't seem appropriate. The only two I can think even come close were Maldonado (also on Hamilton) in qualifying at Monaco, which got him a five-place grid drop, and when Schumacher half-tried to take out Villeneuve in a title-decider in 1997 and crippled his own car. That got him disqualified from the entire season, and I'm having a hard time coming up with ways that a 2.4G deceleration in the middle of a straight in a potential title-decider is less bad than that.


IF rules were equally applied, Verstappen would have missed about three races this year through licence point totting-up bans and disqualification. But as we saw on Sunday, if a rule exists to cover a situation, Michael Masi can ignore it. It's like the Rule 34 of motorsport.
All fair points, again, the lacking of consistent stewarding is the biggest issue with this season. That and apparently we don't like watching racing anymore. Nonetheless, Saudi Arabia isn't as clear cut as all that,

And if the safety car overtake is being classed as an overtake in peoples minds then wow, I mean, when I read that was being protested I had to go back and watch it a few times to figure out where. And Karun Chandhoks wonky line didn't help much.
 
Two of those wins for Max were gifts from the FIA. Yesterday of course. And Spa, which was not a race no matter how much they want us to believe it was.
Interesting thing about Spa, regardless of classification, is if it didn't count, and I agree, it absolutely should not have counted, it wouldn't have altered the championship outcome in any way. Even in race wins he would have had 1 extra anyway and the points difference was inconsequential. Biggest loser would have been Russel and Williams.
 
Nonetheless, Saudi Arabia isn't as clear cut as all that
It was a 2.4G braking effort in the middle of the track while moving slightly left. Even though F1 cars can do considerably more than that, it's a pretty clear cut stamp on the brakes.
And if the safety car overtake is being classed as an overtake in peoples minds then wow, I mean, when I read that was being protested I had to go back and watch it a few times to figure out where. And Karun Chandhoks wonky line didn't help much.
It was considered as one for Magnussen in Canada in 2017. Simply put, Verstappen was ahead of Hamilton, however briefly. That got Magnussen a 5s penalty and two points. This is the only overtake of the safety car in the entire hybrid era not to attract a time penalty.
All fair points, again, the lacking of consistent stewarding is the biggest issue with this season.
Indeed, and the drivers and teams can only race to what they believe to be the ruleset at the time (or what they perceive it to be).

That's why Verstappen shouldn't be penalised by having the championship taken off him - with the single exception of if there is any proven collusion between Red Bull and officials, which has no merit at this moment in time (much though I'd love Horner to be Briatoried :lol: ).

Best-case scenario is probably that this single race result is annulled and no-one involved on behalf of the FIA is allowed anywhere near decision-making roles again. That would vindicate Mercedes, punish the right people, and not punish the wrong person.
 
Last edited:
It was a 2.4G braking effort in the middle of the track while moving slightly left. Even though F1 cars can do considerably more than that, it's a pretty clear cut stamp on the brakes.

It was considered as one for Magnussen in Canada in 2017. Simply put, Verstappen was ahead of Hamilton, however briefly. That got Magnussen a 5s penalty and two points. This is the only overtake of the safety car in the entire hybrid era not to attract a time penalty.

Indeed, and the drivers and teams can only race to what they believe to be the ruleset at the time (or what they perceive it to be).

That's why Verstappen shouldn't be penalised by having the championship taken off him - with the single exception of if there is any proven collusion between Red Bull and officials, which has no merit at this moment in time (much though I'd love Horner to be Briatoried :lol: ). Best-case scenario is probably that this single race result is annulled and no-one involved on behalf of the FIA is allowed anywhere near decision-making roles again.
I just see the Jeddah one slightly differently, Hamilton has a lot of time to pass Verstappen and doesn't, he's off the racing line and Hamilton follows him, yes the penalty was deserved but question marks over why Hamilton didn't just pass him.

I have to confess I don't remember Magnussens and I can't find any reference footage. I can't see it being anything more then alongside but the angles they've shown aren't very good.
 
Back