Nah, the hards just lasted longer than anyone foresaw. Not being able to follow a car didn't really play a part too much.The fact that a guy who pitted 20 laps after the driver in front of him, couldn’t get past, outlines the problem with F1 today...
When Lewis pitted, they did not trust the hards to last for them. Should have taken the gamble, because they already had Charles on alternative strategy.How did Ferrari throw that away?
That said, Vettel was a ****ing idiot at the start. Almost wiping out Lewis and then rear-ending his team mate... shades of 2017(?), his driving is, at times, shambolic.
Max cruized 65 laps on hards. That's the only positive for him about this raceWhen Lewis pitted, they did not trust the hards to last for them. Should have taken the gamble, because they already had Charles on alternative strategy.
They made a pitstop with change of compound mandatory otherwise some racers can race with the same hards the complete race. I guess this rule will not be changed this Thursday?Why do they always underestimate the hard tire? Do they think it's so much slower it's not worth it over long stints? It doesn't matter how slow you are if there's nowhere to pass which is how most of these tracks are. Mexico is a bit of an exception with the downforce situation but still. Hard tires are made to last
How Max got driver of the day is beyond me!
THAT'S the problem, combined with the aero wall they hit. None of the top 6 could really get within 2s without those aero issues.Nah, the hards just lasted longer than anyone foresaw. Not being able to follow a car didn't really play a part too much.
The tires last way too long. The softs lasting 10 and the mediums lasting 25 were great. The time differences still sucked between the medium and hard. Most importantly: You should never be able to run more than 75% of a GP on a single set of tires.