I don't think excluded, but a grid penalty is very likelyThe Merc's should be excluded.
Will more than likely result in a fine due to process failure.The Merc's should be excluded.
Yeah, similar to an unsafe release really.Will more than likely result in a fine due to process failure.
Thats a polite way of saying they cheated.Will more than likely result in a fine due to process failure.
Since it can also give an advantage, I think a grid penalty is reasonableWill more than likely result in a fine due to process failure.
Yep, kind of. It's still not the drivers who cheated and it probably wouldn't have made too much of a difference. However, past incidents have shown that process infringements usually result in a financial penalty - it's only when drivers impede others which result in grid penalties.Thats a polite way of saying they cheated.![]()
It can, but it has to prove an advantage or disadvantaging someone else.Since it can also give an advantage, I think a grid penalty is reasonable
And subsequently robbing Albon of a Q2 appearance.Hulkenbergs Q1 time was deleted, retroactively knocking him out, deleting all his Q2 times, and putting him back in P16, behind Albon.
They do at least somewhat acknowledge that it's not supposed to have gone like this:And subsequently robbing Albon of a Q2 appearance.
What a farce.
During Q1, Car 27 clearly exceeded track limits in turn 11.
However this was not reported to the Stewards until Q2 had commenced. Car 27’s time recorded on the lap that track limits were exceeded, was sufficient to place it in Q2. Hence at the time the Stewards were informed that Car 27 had breached the Race Directors Event Notes and that its lap should have been deleted, it was already on track in Q2.
As this is an unusual situation, the Stewards have decided to settle the matter by exercising their authority under Article 11.9.2.a of the FIA International Sporting Code.