MagpieRacer
Premium
- 17,274
- Wymondham, Norfolk
- Seagull_Racer
Yuki's radio, being told to leave the pits and then stop.
"Go out, go out the exit and then stop in a safe place"
š¤
You don't think being told to leave the pits and stop on track is fishy in any way whatsoever?Yes, Red Bull is intentionally making their drivers cause yellow flags to rig the results and also they're secretly going ā¬100 million over the budget cap. They're doing this to win races and championships they were going to win anyway, because of [no reason].
You think blocking the pit exit is a better idea than finding a marshall post and leaving it in a safe area? And you also think Red Bull would genuinely blatantly cheat to get a race win they do not even remotely need, and would've very likely gotten anyway?You don't think being told to leave the pits and stop on track is fishy in any way whatsoever?
Everyone, right up until the supposed crashgates 2.0 (yesterday) and 3.0 (today), and they will continue again when Red Bull brings new updates to Singapore. Unless there is a new insane theory by then.Who said anything about budget caps?
The pit area would still have been the safest overall place for Yuki to be given his issues. That way they're not sending an obviously crippled car onto an active race track, and at the very least the AT crews wouldn't have to travel particularly far to recover the car.You think blocking the pit exit is a better idea than finding a marshall post and leaving it in a safe area?
FWIW, I personally don't think for a second that Red Bull cheated here, but you can't deny that it was incredibly convenient for Verstappen that Yuki had his issues when he did, even though it was fairly short-lived. Considering that it happened to a (by proxy) teammate, and it was for Verstappens home race, it's not hard to see how at least a few eyebrows are raised.And you also think Red Bull would genuinely blatantly cheat to get a race win they do not even remotely need, and would've very likely gotten anyway?
I don't think this has anything to do with the budget caps, but I don't see any reason why teams shouldn't be beholden to keeping their spending within the established limits, and why there shouldn't be questions about it if overspending is suspected. I do distinctly remember Brawn saying that anyone trying to exceed the limits would be dealt significant penalties that could alter their championship hopes.Everyone, right up until the supposed crashgates 2.0 (yesterday) and 3.0 (today), and they will continue again when Red Bull brings new updates to Singapore. Unless there is a new insane theory by then.
Overspending, whether in the numbers voluntarily declared by a team up front, or those discovered later via an investigation, falls into two categories.
Thereās a simple split at 5% of the cap: a breach below that is regarded as a āminor overspendā, while anything above 5% is a āmaterial overspendā. The latter case is taken far more seriously.
That 5% number is not insignificant. Teams are currently aiming for $140m plus $1.2m for the 22nd race, making for a 2022 total of $141.2m. Thus a 5% breach represents extra spending of around $7m ā which equates to a huge amount of R&D, potentially enough to make the difference between winning or losing the title.
The rules note that in the event of an overspend below 5% the CCAP āmay impose a financial penalty and/or any minor sporting penalties.ā
You guys do realize that stopping in the pit exit would completely block the entire pitlane, and cause way more issues than stopping on track, right?
Of course they tell him to get out and get to a safe place, that's a pretty standard procedure.
Apparently so. They also, quite clearly on the radio message, tell him to leave the pits and then stop. Implying that they knew there was a problem and sent him anyway. It's all very odd and very convenient and of course can't be proven. It's likely that the outcome will have remained the same regardless thanks to Bottas breaking down but if he hadn't, more than a few questions will have been raised on top of those already being asked by a few in the paddock.I might be mis-remembering, but didn't AT determine the issue before releasing Yuki?
Yuki's radio, being told to leave the pits and then stop.
"Go out, go out the exit and then stop in a safe place"
š¤
There was nothing on the broadcast to suggest that. Yuki said the car felt odd and loosened his belts, they cleared it on the telemetry and got him to drive back to the pits and found nothing. Then they sent him out again.I might be mis-remembering, but didn't AT determine the issue before releasing Yuki?
It's making the clear argument that risk vs reward is not even remotely worth it here.I mean that video is just him saying believe me! Itās true RB wouldnāt cheat.
Not much proof in there.
Best video Iāve seen and I think this clears everything that they is no conspiracy or cheating at all.I wouldn't be drawing conclusions from a video that removes the context of the actual event from the radio messages...
Surely the exit being referred to here is the trackside access point, which is where he stopped. Not the pit exit. And even if it was, the pit exit would have been exactly where Tsunoda wouldve realised that there was still a problem, given that he had to turn 180 degrees to rejoin the track.
Edit: https://streamff.com/v/810424
Tsunoda suspected a broken diff after he was already in the pit exit lane with nowhere to pull over.
George, we need to get Lewis back in the race, can you crash into our other car to cause a red flag.Best video Iāve seen and I think this clears everything that they is no conspiracy or cheating at all.
Yuki boxās for hard tyres and as he exits pit exit he says ātyre are not fittedā then stops on track, switches of the car and then loosens a seat belt. AT say tyres are fine and to drive back. They is no indication here that the diff is broken. Yuki then mentions on the way back to the pits a possible diff broken but AT donāt confirm this, which to me obviously means they are unable to see on the data this problem. If AT canāt see the damage or dont see the damage on the data why should AT be forced to retire a that that not faulty? As he then drives on the pit exit, again he says diff is broken and by the time he gets the radio call to stop the car he has already passed the crash barrier on the outside and has an active track a few feet away from him. As he has passed this barrier even if he stops straight away it will still activate a VSC or SC as the marshalls have to enter the track. Just before he stops it sounds like something then breaks and he loses all drive.
As for why did they send him back out 2 laps down. When he first pitted he was on the lead lap and on pit exit was passed by the leaders. Then he gets lapped again. They send him back out as if a SC or red flag happens he can unlap himself, just like Hamilton did in Imola 2021. What is funny is that when Hamilton repaired his car and unlapped himself all under a red flag at Imola I didnāt see many people complaining.
What I don't get is why the team didn't notice the diff was broke. They didn't pick it up in the 4 minutes from him first stopping to the moment he left his pit box, but they did seconds after him doing so. Yuki then drives away with no menace at all, almost like he still knows the car is broke and doesn't trust his team saying the car is fine - because the team have not actually done anything to it. The whole situation screams incompetence.Yuki then mentions on the way back to the pits a possible diff broken but AT donāt confirm this, which to me obviously means they are unable to see on the data this problem. If AT canāt see the damage or dont see the damage on the data why should AT be forced to retire a that that not faulty? As he then drives on the pit exit, again he says diff is broken and by the time he gets the radio call to stop the car he has already passed the crash barrier on the outside and has an active track a few feet away from him. As he has passed this barrier even if he stops straight away it will still activate a VSC or SC as the marshalls have to enter the track.
While I don't think that there were any shenanigans going on - and also what crack were Mercedes smoking if they thought they had a chance against Verstappen without the VSC/SC - it would be well to remember the tale of the frog and the scorpion.The best part is the main argument isnāt āRed Bull didnāt do that because they have integrityā but instead āRed Bull didnāt do that because it wasnāt really justified given their already strong championship positionā
Everyone knows that team would have zero problem orchestrating something like that if they felt the reward outweighed the risk.
History has shown that most teams have little issue with cheating. Some just took it a bit further than others. So anyone making an argument out of integrity for any team would honestly be naive. So yeah, then only the risk vs reward really remains.The best part is the main argument isnāt āRed Bull didnāt do that because they have integrityā but instead āRed Bull didnāt do that because it wasnāt really justified given their already strong championship positionā
Everyone knows that team would have zero problem orchestrating something like that if they felt the reward outweighed the risk.
Yeah but if they is no data saying the car is broken how do you know it broken?What I don't get is why the team didn't notice the diff was broke. They didn't pick it up in the 4 minutes from him first stopping to the moment he left his pit box, but they did seconds after him doing so. Yuki then drives away with no menace at all, almost like he still knows the car is broke and doesn't trust his team saying the car is fine - because the team have not actually done anything to it. The whole situation screams incompetence.
I would say I'm shocked that the whole thing didn't get investigated for being dangerous quite frankly, but this is the FIA, so I'm not any more.
Why did they tell him to stop the second time, then? The amount of things they can see on telemetry - they used to be able to tell drivers what diff setting use to on corner entry/exit to gain a hundredth of a second - but they can't see drive going to only one wheel? It's just absolutely ridiculous.Yeah but if they is no data saying the car is broken how do you know it broken?
The diff helps rotate the wheels, and Yuki says in an interview he could only feel one side spinning. No wonder he didnāt drive away in menace as he only had traction in one side. Also AT never confirmed over the radio the diff was broken. They just tell him to stop in a safe place.
Perhaps the Bottas failure need investigating too? Maybe he didnāt want Hamilton to win so he switched the engine off himself so he could stop on track to bring out a full safety car so then Max would be right behind Hamilton not 15 seconds +
I, too, like to cast aspersions over teams even after accusations of them race fixing have been completely and utterly debunked.The best part is the main argument isnāt āRed Bull didnāt do that because they have integrityā but instead āRed Bull didnāt do that because it wasnāt really justified given their already strong championship positionā
Everyone knows that team would have zero problem orchestrating something like that if they felt the reward outweighed the risk.