FRL~ToCA11~GTP #1~ CHAMPIONS: Ninners (RPM-ECM), AMD87 (Alfa) Team SYM (Nissan)! FINAL TABLES UP!Open

[Scaniabebe]

Well, the HSR Postman has been busy this morning...

I think Ford might have a thing or two to say about the stickers...

 

[Ninners]

That works out perfectly for RPM.

 

[Scaniabebe]

That works out perfectly for RPM.

Why?

 

[Ninners]

Dat Ford badge.

 

[Scaniabebe]

Dat Ford badge.

But the Renault badge is bigger...
Bigger is better...

 

[Ninners]

Then why does it say Transit on the side

 

[Scaniabebe]

Haven't you heard about the new Renault Transit?

 

[rustyMercedes]

still have spots available?

sign me up! 👍

 

[snowgt]

@Furinkazen

Please confirm which one is correct for the Civic:

1. Intake Tuning, no ECU - 342hp, 481PP, PL=100.0%
2. ECU, No Intake Tuning - 343hp, 481PP, PL=100.0%
3. ECU + Intake Tuning - 338hp, 481PP, PL=93.8%
4. ECU + Intake Tuning - 342hp, 483PP, PL=95.0%

In the spec sheet, in case of 1. there's 1 error, in all other cases, there's 2 errors.

@Yeratel84

 

[Furinkazen]

@Furinkazen

Please confirm which one is correct for the Civic:

1. Intake Tuning, no ECU - 342hp, 481PP, PL=100.0%
2. ECU, No Intake Tuning - 343hp, 481PP, PL=100.0%
3. ECU + Intake Tuning - 338hp, 481PP, PL=93.8%
4. ECU + Intake Tuning - 342hp, 483PP, PL=95.0%

In the spec sheet, in case of 1. there's 1 error, in all other cases, there's 2 errors.

@Yeratel84

I'll hop on to check shortly.

 

[Panoz]

Well, the HSR Postman has been busy this morning...

I think Ford might have a thing or two to say about the stickers...

Much better.

 

[Furinkazen]

Much better.

You all fail. Humberside have to resort to using Ford parts, the Renault is overlooked, and you never ever considered.

 

[Yeratel84]

@Furinkazen

Please confirm which one is correct for the Civic:

1. Intake Tuning, no ECU - 342hp, 481PP, PL=100.0%
2. ECU, No Intake Tuning - 343hp, 481PP, PL=100.0%
3. ECU + Intake Tuning - 338hp, 481PP, PL=93.8%
4. ECU + Intake Tuning - 342hp, 483PP, PL=95.0%

In the spec sheet, in case of 1. there's 1 error, in all other cases, there's 2 errors.

@Yeratel84

I'll hop on to check shortly.

Furi, is your memory made of soap bubbles?

This past monday when we were checking the spec sheets you had posted you said to me that parts listed for the Civic were correct, that you just needed to update the PP (from 481 to 483) and add the PL value (which is 95%)...

 

[Scaniabebe]

So, the Humberside Racing Website has gone down for it to be redesigned!
Must mean something exiting is going to be happening soon!

 

[Yeratel84]

So, the Humberside Racing Website has gone down for it to be redesigned!
Must mean something exiting is going to be happening soon!

Exiting? I thought you were going to announce someone entering your team...

 

[Scaniabebe]

Exiting? I thought you were going to announce someone entering your team...

Well Postman Pat's Van has broke down, so I'm waiting for my mail!
Still, there will be a lot of changes within HSR this upcoming couple of weeks...

 

[Furinkazen]

@Furinkazen

Please confirm which one is correct for the Civic:

1. Intake Tuning, no ECU - 342hp, 481PP, PL=100.0%
2. ECU, No Intake Tuning - 343hp, 481PP, PL=100.0%
3. ECU + Intake Tuning - 338hp, 481PP, PL=93.8%
4. ECU + Intake Tuning - 342hp, 483PP, PL=95.0%

In the spec sheet, in case of 1. there's 1 error, in all other cases, there's 2 errors.

@Yeratel84

Furi, is your memory made of soap bubbles?

This past monday when we were checking the spec sheets you had posted you said to me that parts listed for the Civic were correct, that you just needed to update the PP (from 481 to 483) and add the PL value (which is 95%)...

^Checked and it is #1. Apologies to @Roflwaffle and @Siggers if this has caused any issues testing your Civics.

 

[MatheusBond]

Apricot Hill Reverse: 1:27.6

Decided to run a bit there too to test the cars, fastest 26.5.

 

[Yeratel84]

^Checked and it is #1. Apologies to @Roflwaffle and @Siggers if this has caused any issues testing your Civics.

Thanks a lot for the apology Furi, for making me waste a week testing the Honda along with other cars giving my team mate and me a wrong impression of its pace against other options...

I checked everything with you more than once monday evening (parts, power, PP, Power Limiter), which ended up with you telling me that parts on spec sheet were correct (including ECU), and all I needed to do was apply PL in order to meet target power...

 

[Furinkazen]

Well at least i'm good enough to offer one.

 

[Yeratel84]

Well at least i'm good enough to offer one.

Sorry, forgot to use the irony font... since I wasn't refered in said apology...

And here I was thinking that Civic was actually on par with upgraded Focus...

 

[Scaniabebe]

Appears the first TOCA-11 argument is soon to take place...

 

[Andil]

Chill Yera, it's 342hp v 343hp we're talking about, hardly going to make a bit of difference on lap time.

Also to bring up a different point.. we don't drop points scores, but we have a two-week gap to accommodate Furi? I appreciate you run the championship but it hardly seems fair.

I will miss two weeks of this because of my other commitments, but that basically means I already can't compete for anything other than random points which will mean nothing come the end of it. No one else annoyed by the same situation?

Same as in the Clios I lost the chance to win that because I couldn't make a race.

If you have to be there to run the races, that's fine, but there's no such leniency for anyone else. Why can't we just drop one weekend's worst score?

 

[Furinkazen]

Chill Yera, it's 342hp v 343hp we're talking about, hardly going to make a bit of difference on lap time.

Also to bring up a different point.. we don't drop points scores, but we have a two-week gap to accommodate Furi? I appreciate you run the championship but it hardly seems fair.

I will miss two weeks of this because of my other commitments, but that basically means I already can't compete for anything other than random points which will mean nothing come the end of it. No one else annoyed by the same situation?

Same as in the Clios I lost the chance to win that because I couldn't make a race.

If you have to be there to run the races, that's fine, but there's no such leniency for anyone else. Why can't we just drop one weekend's worst score?

I actually tabled to Stewards idea of a dropped score, vote was no...

 

[Scaniabebe]

I actually tabled to Stewards idea of a dropped score, vote was no...

I don't see why to be fair... As it would make it a lot more equal and even...
For example, it wouldn't effect people who have to miss a race or two - but it also means that a Driver/Car's Weak Track can have the points eliminated; making the Championship fight much closer!

 

[Andil]

I actually tabled to Stewards idea of a dropped score, vote was no...

What if you get drivers to vote and see? Can the Stewards make all the races or something? Seems strange, as every time a drop-score is polled in other championships it seems to get accepted hands down.

 

[Furinkazen]

What if you get drivers to vote and see? Can the Stewards make all the races or something? Seems strange, as every time a drop-score is polled in other championships it seems to get accepted hands down.

Too short a season was explanation I got. Cough @Yeratel84 .

 

[Ninners]

I will miss two weeks of this because of my other commitments, but that basically means I already can't compete for anything other than random points which will mean nothing come the end of it. No one else annoyed by the same situation?

Same here, but I'm cool about it, I'm only annoyed because I won't be locked in for Round 2 as I'm missing R1 and R3.

 

[DK]

I'm abandoning the 86, it's not worth the risk of suffering snap oversteer when you're racing in a pack.

 

[Bo]

I'm abandoning the 86, it's not worth the risk of suffering snap oversteer when you're racing in a pack.

I'm still not getting the snap oversteer that's been wildly reported. The chassis feels super tight for a RWD.