- 89
So nobody still doesnt know if the way the fuel runs out is just based on distance traveled or how hard or easy u drive push the car.and i imagine fuel doesnt efffect the weight of the physics either.
Actually, I would have to disagree with you on that one. If you have ever watched the Top Gear episode where Jeremy Clarkson tries (and succeeds) to break the 10 minute mark around the 'Ring in a Jaguar diesel, you will understand why I say thisthe InterceptorThe 120d is quicker than the 120i though.
Majarvis...lots of stuff about diesels.....
Kind of true, but not a problem really. Let's say a Diesel has its power band from 1500 - 3500 revs. If you shift at 3500, you'll get to 1500-2000 revs in the next gear. So actually, you can use a diesel like a gasoline engine, just that the usable rev band is a few rpms lower.ExigeExcel@minesotta
But wouldn't that leave you painfully low on revs in the next gear
Yes, but if you chose to shift at (lets use my example) 2,300 rpm *100 rpm above maximum power* you would bog/stall the engine, since when you shift into the next gear, it would be very low in the rpm range. Not to mention you wouldn't be taking advantage of the gearing available, and you would "run out of steam" in the top gear.Minnesota01R6I would disagree with you somewhat, since you can always choose to shift at the optimal shift point for the car you're in. My STi runs out of air before I get to redline, so I set my shift point in the 6500-6800 range. I don't take it to redline because I accelerate slower than I would if I shifted into the next gear sooner. You can do the same thing with a diesel, and shift at the 3500 rpm point, so that you are always in the powerband.
the InterceptorKind of true, but not a problem really. Let's say a Diesel has its power band from 1500 - 3500 revs. If you shift at 3500, you'll get to 1500-2000 revs in the next gear. So actually, you can use a diesel like a gasoline engine, just that the usable rev band is a few rpms lower.
Ok, but your assumpion implies that there is no power if you get over 2200 rpm. 2200 rpm may be the point of maximum power, but that doesn't mean there's no power around 2200 rpm. Like I said, I do drive a diesel, the limit is 5000 rpm, it's usable up to 4000. So I can use the power from 1500 up to 4000 which is enough to get through all the gears very well. Like minnesota said, you can be quick in a Diesel if you know how you have to use a Diesel engine.MajarvisYes, but if you chose to shift at (lets use my example) 2,300 rpm *100 rpm above maximum power* you would bog/stall the engine, since when you shift into the next gear, it would be very low in the rpm range. Not to mention you wouldn't be taking advantage of the gearing available, and you would "run out of steam" in the top gear.
You shift to optimize power, if max torque is at 4500 rpm, you shift at say 7000 so your at 4000 again in the next gear.ExigeExcel@minesotta
But wouldn't that leave you painfully low on revs in the next gear
Its still comparable, almost all diesels are turbo'd now a days, thats no excuse. If it were say, WRX vs Z06 no one would worry about induction its accepeted what each engine does.Taneras120d's 0-62mph is 7.9 seconds
120i's 0-62mph is 8.7 seconds
I have looked up 3 sources and all said the same thing.
But its unfair to compare the two since the 120d is turbo'd and the 120i is N/A. In other words slap a turbo on the 120i and it'd walk all over the 120d.
Diesels aren't made for racing, sorry guys...
Its still comparable, almost all diesels are turbo'd now a days, thats no excuse. If it were say, WRX vs Z06 no one would worry about induction its accepeted what each engine does.
Turbo Diesel is the 120d.well sinse it's already been bumped (sory cant resist)...
The wrx is a 2 liter, the Z06 in question is (probably) a 5.7 liter.
The engines in the BMW 120i and 120d are both the same size, so yes, one having a turbo is an advantage. flip flop the hp and torque figures of the 120d and that'd probably be about right for a turbo version of the engine in the 120i.
Bump!
Okay I love the BMW 120d! Its fun, small car to drive and with a few upgrades pretty darn fast.
I tried to test the fuel theory during the 'Ring 24 but B Spec stops for fuel too often. The reality is I can go at least 8-10 laps before I need to stop for fuel but I need to find a shorter race so I can see if I can really leg out a difference.
You know what, I don't think anyone ever has, but that would be a good way to tell how GT4 models their fuel consumption. I'll run the tests tonight and get back to this thread somewhere tomorrow in the afternoon.Has anyone ever done a test where they run laps shifting early, keeping the revs down, and compared it to an otherwise identical session where they run it into the red line? Or maybe two tests comparing half throttle to full throttle runs? Elementary stuff, and it would show whether it's based on anything other than displacement and distance traveled.
You know what, I don't think anyone ever has, but that would be a good way to tell how GT4 models their fuel consumption. I'll run the tests tonight and get back to this thread somewhere tomorrow in the afternoon
Has anyone ever done a test where they run laps shifting early, keeping the revs down, and compared it to an otherwise identical session where they run it into the red line? Or maybe two tests comparing half throttle to full throttle runs? Elementary stuff, and it would show whether it's based on anything other than displacement and distance traveled.
I remember that that Jag E type in gt4 realy liked her fuel,maby a good car to do some runs.