- 34,949
- Indian Falls, NY
- slashfan7964
I wish the road car had beefy sidewalls like that. I'm so over low profile tires.
I agree. I have never like low profile tires.
I wish the road car had beefy sidewalls like that. I'm so over low profile tires.
So the standard car is actually better around a track?
I thought the GTS had an adjustable suspension that could actually be set stiffer than the standard one?
Thats the "TA" Viper that Motortrend forced SRT to build....
You can take your obvious agenda elsewhere, now.If you've driven the new SRT Viper, you probably want to own it--well, you do if you're the same kind of crazy we are. But apparently those of us who want it aren't buying it, as Chrysler has cut production by one-third due to slow sales and the impending fall and winter months.
Ultimately, it's perhaps unsurprising that given a still-slow economy and a great deal of political/governmental uncertainty about the future, the $102,485 SRT Viper hasn't been selling like the hot little bit of extremely fast cake it is.
What's there to discuss? Everyone is well aware that you're only interested in discussing the Viper being a failure of a car after your comments in the other thread.Whatever. Shame that you feel that way instead of starting a discussion, that's what these boards are for. Some news aren't always good no matter how much you want them to be.
Claim made.Meh. Same old recipe, now with improved interior quality. Sadly, the exterior still falls apart and catches on fire, given the chance, and apparently the floor gets so hot that it will burn your feet. Also, for a sportscar ( since supercar it is not), it has apparently unforgivable problem with brakes failing/disintegrating after couple laps.
Source only confirmed part of this. The rest, you twisted the words.Source would be Motortrends Best Drivers Car competition. One of Vipers grilles blew off from the hood while on the road, the pedal box and brakes failed completely during the track testing.
Link
You claim you want to start a discussion, yet you make it quite clear that you already have your opinion set & that we should "just accept" it because you know, your word is fact.Or you could just accept that SRT Viper has shoddy quality for a car that is over 110k$.
Exorcet asks for proof, this is what you respond with.Right there. 110k track-oriented car, falling apart during heavy testing. Sure, it might be one off, a monday piece with mismatched tires and loose seat fastener bolts, but for that kind of price I would expect more.
Then, you run away from the discussion claiming someone's upset.We can only agree to disagree at this point. I've put in my vote, you have put in yours and that's it, no need to get all upset about it.
You're part of the reason they're slowing production. Not because nobody wants it, but because the large amount of people who do want it can't afford it.Actually, I wouldn't mind owning one
The people who can afford it want to buy a quality, refined product, at least for the most part. I'd imagine that most SRT Viper owners are either very wealthy or took out a massive loan.You're part of the reason they're slowing production. Not because nobody wants it, but because the large amount of people who do want it can't afford it.
You're part of the reason they're slowing production. Not because nobody wants it, but because the large amount of people who do want it can't afford it.
Three cars that come to mind that this version would do well against.
C7
GT-R
458 Italia
I remember something... The Chrysler Firepower Concept of 2005(?). Awesome name aside, it was powered by the 6.1 Hemi V8 producing 425HP. Probably a proposal for a cheaper, more accessible alternative to the Viper. This was back when the Viper was truly a brutal car.
Maybe this is the kind of car you guys are talking about. Give it a new body, drop in the 392 Hemi and market it as a softer Chrysler GT like a DB9 to the Viper's Vanquish.