Gran Turismo 7: Latest news and discussion thread

  • Thread starter sems4arsenal
  • 43,626 comments
  • 5,056,396 views
McLaren is currently at a higher level. No car made by Lotus competes with the 720S in tech, past or present.
…right

32F7D826-8730-42BC-9163-0BBC9606C025.jpeg
 
Not to mention the Emira doesn't actually exist as a production model yet, and it surely didn't exist when Lotus were negotiating prices for GT Sport.
 
The Mercedes SLR McLaren is literally called that so I'm not sure how it's supposed to "lose" its McLaren "branding".

As for the 12C and the MP4-12C, 2011 and most 2012 cars are called MP4-12C, while late-2012 to 2014 cars are called 12C - roughly corresponding to the introduction of the Spider model. Here, have a picture of the inside of an MP4-12C, specifically #232 built in 2011:

View attachment 1090750

View attachment 1090741

Interesting. Thanks for clarification!

I asked because FM6 was the last Forza with the SLR and, in that game (and in FH2), the McLaren branding was dropped. When it comes to the 12C, I'd have to check but, if they have a 2012, there's the answer.


McLaren has released at least 3 cars of that caliber in the last 10 years, whereas the Evija is not in production yet.
 
So, I'm confused. Are the pr teams of car brands, in general, decide on licensing or no?
Generally, yes.

In the case of almost all individual car brands there will be someone on the PR team whose job it is to interface with other brands and develop partnerships - such as licensing the brand's vehicles to game developers (through their publishers usually) - while the ultimate final decision will be with the general big PR boss at head office, wherever in the world that is.

There are some situations where that might not be the case; some brands, like Caterham in the UK, outsource their PR to specialist PR companies. It's still basically the same idea, but I can't say for certain if the brands would allow an external PR team a sufficient level of autonomy to decide on game licensing.

Stellantis is also an unusual case, but then it always has been before it was even Stellantis. In the UK at least, the PR teams for Peugeot/Citroen and DS (PSA) were pretty interchangeable, and Vauxhall was absorbed into that structure, while the FCA brands of FIAT, Alfa, and Jeep were also managed by the same team; now they're all under one roof and while I can't say that this is the case at head office where licensing decisions are made, the fact Stellantis went to the trouble of unifying UK PR teams suggests it restructured throughout and it's likely all global PR is managed by one team; there has been some recent strangeness with Stellantis licensing (see Forza Horizon 5) that suggests something like this is afoot.

As I say, that is not the case with ZGH. The brands' individual PR teams are separate, as they are with Volkswagen, Audi, Skoda, SEAT, and Porsche, and make their own decisions on this sort of thing; they absolutely speak to each other, and there are broader PR teams that deal with the entire company as a whole, but they're not "above" the brands' PRs in the sense of being able to overrule or impose decisions. Volkswagen AG doesn't control what Volkswagen, Audi, etc. does in PR terms with the budgets they've set - and in any case licensing brings money in.
 
Last edited:
@Famine Thanks for the explanation, that helps with what I was curious about.

Hmmm, so Lotus in this case decided on their own licensing price then and not with Geely. I guess that also explains why it can be easier to license a VW than a Porsche for instance despite them being under the same umbrella.
 
Posting a picture of a car without any context or any proof of sales or commercial success doesn't mean it's "better" than the other car (or whatever the hell it is you're trying to prove here), mainly because you won't be able to find it. On the other hand, if you emailed McLaren via the appropriate professional channels about the sales and commercial success of the 720S they'd probably have the data ready within a few hours.

Also, please read up on "Brand Value" and "Brand Equity", then apply it to the two brands in question here and ask yourself:

"Is Lotus really on the same level as McLaren?"
There's nothing wrong with having an opinion on something, but don't force it upon others as if it's an indisputable fact when you don't have anything outside of a jpeg and no sales or commercial numbers to back it up.
 
Last edited:
This is the second person who thinks I’m talking about overall commercial success when the post I initially replied to talks about the technology in the the 720S versus any car that Lotus has made. I never implied a car was better or worse, tried to imply Lotus had greater brand heritage/value than McLaren, or tried to force any kind of opinion onto others.

It’s like my words are being misconstrued purposely. Strange
 
Last edited:
Posting a picture of a car without any context or any proof of sales or commercial success doesn't mean it's "better" than the other car (or whatever the hell it is you're trying to prove here), mainly because you won't be able to find it. On the other hand, if you emailed McLaren via the appropriate professional channels about the sales and commercial success of the 720S they'd probably have the data ready within a few hours.

Also, please read up on "Brand Value" and "Brand Equity", then apply it to the two brands in question here and ask yourself:

"Is Lotus really on the same level as McLaren?"
There's nothing wrong with having an opinion on something, but don't force it upon others as if it's an indisputable fact when you don't have anything outside of a jpeg and no sales or commercial numbers to back it up.
@TS020 literally quoted the post he was replying to, which if you read it, gives you all the context you need to understand his post. I'd recommend that people read before replying or move along. If you did you would see that neither posts referred to brand value or brand equity and neither posts were forcing any views on any other person. It's fine to dissagree, but at least dissagree with the point made.
 
Last edited:
What about the rumor these past few days that the GT7 had entered the PSN database [Chess] an internal beta?
 
Last edited:
Famitsu's Top 30 most wanted games

1. [NSW] Shin Megami Tensei V – 652 votes
2. [PS5] Final Fantasy XVI – 647 votes
3. [NSW] Bayonetta 3 – 549 votes
4. [NSW] Zelda: Breath of the Wild 2 – 509 votes
5. [NSW] Pokemon Brilliant Diamond/Shining Pearl – 469 votes
6. [NSW] Splatoon 3 – 339 votes
7. [NSW] Super Robot Wars 30 – 279 votes
8. [PS4] Super Robot Wars 30 – 270 votes
9. [PS5] Gran Turismo 7 – 246 votes
10. [NSW] Triangle Strategy – 239 votes
11. [NSW] Ushiro – 231 votes
12. [NSW] Pokemon Legends: Arceus – 212 votes
13. [PS5] Pragmata – 173 votes
14. [PS4] Elden Ring – 170 votes
15. [NSW] Touken Ranbu Warriors – 145 votes
16. [NSW] Mario Party Superstars – 133 votes
17. [PS4] Dynasty Warriors 9 Empires – 125 votes
18. [NSW] Chocobo GP – 109 votes
19. [PS4] Anonymous;Code – 106 votes
20. [NSW] Megaton Musashi – 88 votes
21. [PS4] Granblue Fantasy Relink – 85 votes
22. [NSW] Anonymous;Code – 83 votes
23. [NSW] Power Pro Kun Pocket R – 82 votes
24. [PS4] The King of Fighters XV – 80 votes
25. [NSW] Kirby and the Forgotten Land – 72 votes
26. [PS5] Elden Ring – 71 votes
27. [PS4] Fatal Frame: Maiden of Black Water – 69 votes
28. [NSW] Danganronpa Decadence – 67 votes
29. [PS4] Relayer – 66 votes
30. [PS4] Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time Remake – 64 votes
 
Last edited:
I'm still surprised PD seems to be ready for the march date.I know GT7 was supposed to release this year but i was expecting one more big delay.
Maybe the outsourcing of car models helped
 
Yeah, I don’t understand why a GT game coming out on its set release date is inconceivable to some people. GT6 released on time, so there’s every chance that GT7 will too.
GT6 does have it's share of delays, although it was a feature/mode (the X2014 Standard/Fan Car was the only one they explicitly delayed btw), not a whole game.
 
Yeah, I don’t understand why a GT game coming out on its set release date is inconceivable to some people. GT6 released on time, so there’s every chance that GT7 will too.
GT6 is the only time in history that it was released on time without changes after the first confirmation of the release date.

At that time I was young and naively thought that the GT series would never make the same mistakes again, until I met GT SPORT.
 
Last edited:
GT6 is the only exception in GT series history where it is confirmed that there will be no postponement after the release date.

At that time I was young and naively thought that the GT series would never make the same mistakes again, until I met GT SPORT.
I dont recall that GT1 was delayed, or GT2 for that matter. But from GT3 onwards delays became pretty much normal for the series.
 
GT6 is the only exception in GT series history where it is confirmed that there will be no postponement after the release date.
That doesn’t mean an on-time release can’t happen again though.
At that time I was young and naively thought that the GT series would never make the same mistakes again, until I met GT SPORT.
Sport had to be made completely from the ground up, so yeah, it getting delayed wasn’t surprising. GT7 however is using Sport as its foundation, just like GT6 used GT5.

I’m not saying a second delay is totally impossible, but I don’t see a good reason why it would be likely. We’ve been getting surprisingly regular info about the game since the September trailer. Things seem to be going smoothly.
 
That doesn’t mean an on-time release can’t happen again though.

Sport had to be made completely from the ground up, so yeah, it getting delayed wasn’t surprising. GT7 however is using Sport as its foundation, just like GT6 used GT5.

I’m not saying a second delay is totally impossible, but I don’t see a good reason why it would be likely. We’ve been getting surprisingly regular info about the game since the September trailer. Things seem to be going smoothly.
I certainly hope that they can do it again, no matter how early or late the date is, I also hope that they can release it on time once they set a clear date.
 
Last edited:
Is there a reason for expecting another delay? Even as content goes, nowadays that's not really a problem, as it can be added post launch, so unless there are problems within the game, I don't see why they would delay it again.
PD have a history of being perfectionists, so the current launch window probably relies greatly on their ability to make the game stable ahead of the release. We really don’t know how close GT7 currently is to matching their quality standards.

On a similar note, the recent screenshots of the main menu looked quite unfinished. Almost like an early-stage sketch lacking refinement. One can only imagine how many loose ends they may be dealing with.
 
Back