I don't believe that intelect like your has missed the PS4 existence as additional reason? Amazing.
The passive aggressive attitude seems to have returned.
Using your logic what can I learn to be more logical and FAIR? Can I learn something of the sort and what... Ok, let me see, you kindly fill me in on anything I miss!
That sales = popularity wasn't my logic, you seem to have missed that.
That's the exact opposite of what I was saying, hence the reason why I said "Sales are an important metric, but they are not the be all and end all of heritage, influence, popularity and in particular quality."
I remember your shining example to us all in recent days nitpicking everyones quotes regarding "numbers of employes appart from people hired trough other means to do exact same job on exact same game", you were masterful at every details (although not from everyones perspective).
And today you are completely capable of pretending you are cognitively unable to connect additional fact that GT6 launched in PS4 era, with DriveClub promised soon and with free version.
I believe that did have much greater effect then what is the difference between "employees and other workers hired trough other means to do exact same job on exact same game".
I'm not quite sure why you keep putting "employees and other workers hired trough other means to do exact same job on exact same game" in quotes when quoting me given that I never said that?
Not to mention that you are still missing the point, so just to be clear the only thing that sales numbers indicate is the number of units an item has sold. Alone it doesn't indicate popularity, how much its liked, how good itr is, nothing. It only indicates how many units were sold.
If you have an issue with it being linked to any other metric (objective or subjective) then you are talking to the wrong person.
I know there is planty to dislike in the ways i express my self, and even in many other regards - BUT what kinds of examples can teach me to be better. Instead of just mods brute power flexing. I do believe positive examples to be much more productive.
You have been asked to stop making this blatantly inaccurate and incorrect assumption already.
As you seem to be incapable of doing so, it can be assumed that you are doing it knowing full well that its missleading. The AUP is quite clear in this regard.
A quite reminder of two points in the AUP you agreed to follow when you joined:
- You will not knowingly post any material that is false, misleading, or inaccurate.
- You will, if asked by a representative of the forums, cease posting any content
If you keep making these unsubstantiated accusations then moderation action will be taken.
This is not a point for discussion or debate, you already know what you should do if you believe a post violates the AUP (regardless of who posts it, be it a member of staff or not).
As such should you continue this line, or try and argue the point it will be treated as what it is, a deliberate AUP violation.