Gran Turismo Sport: General Discussion

  • Thread starter Formidable
  • 47,132 comments
  • 4,797,220 views
I actually contacted one of the fellas in charge of the GT Academy event in Melbourne this Sunday via email, and he said that his colleagues were going to be working on my query, so fingers crossed I get a proper chance to play.
 
I actually contacted one of the fellas in charge of the GT Academy event in Melbourne this Sunday via email, and he said that his colleagues were going to be working on my query, so fingers crossed I get a proper chance to play.
Gook luck mate :D
 
I actually contacted one of the fellas in charge of the GT Academy event in Melbourne this Sunday via email, and he said that his colleagues were going to be working on my query, so fingers crossed I get a proper chance to play.

That's awesome man. Let's hope they sort something...
And let us know your impressions
 
Last edited:
Had you tried the newest patch from DIrt rally? the FFB for tarmac and handling for tarmac has been vastly different now. Most noticeable in pike peak hillclimb. My friend who is on ps4 said the ffb and the ways it handles makes him remind of GT6. you would want to try that out now. He is using a t500rs.

Btw most of my friend think that concept cars and rally car shouldnt had exist in GTS. In which i agreed with them
I didn't like the rally (tarmac and snow) physics of GT games UNTIL GT6. In this specific game my opinion is that they made it work great. And I compare that to Richard Burns Rally, the ultimate rally sim of all times. Only hicap of GT6 was the very strong ffb when on gravel which isn't totally out of reality and it's very easy to reduce also by options for the ffb and suspension settings.
 
I didn't like the rally (tarmac and snow) physics of GT games UNTIL GT6. In this specific game my opinion is that they made it work great. And I compare that to Richard Burns Rally, the ultimate rally sim of all times. Only hicap of GT6 was the very strong ffb when on gravel which isn't totally out of reality and it's very easy to reduce also by options for the ffb and suspension settings.

On which platform do you play RBR on ? Do you had any mods installed?
 
If there arent skid marks or exhaust flames i wont buy it and stay with Forza on the XBOX the sounds i can accept but the rest has to be there......

Graphics lightning looks nice!
 
If there arent skid marks or exhaust flames i wont buy it and stay with Forza on the XBOX the sounds i can accept but the rest has to be there......

Graphics lightning looks nice!
It's just a matter of build. There will be in the game for sure. But sounds...especially the VW VGT gr3 engine sound... I love the car but can't stand the sound.
 
If there arent skid marks or exhaust flames i wont buy it and stay with Forza on the XBOX the sounds i can accept but the rest has to be there......

Graphics lightning looks nice!
yWUAOCy.jpg


Skid marks coming soon :lol:
 
If there arent skid marks or exhaust flames i wont buy it and stay with Forza on the XBOX the sounds i can accept but the rest has to be there......

Graphics lightning looks nice!

GT6 is old game now on a PS3. But still has one of the best if not the best skid marks, smoke affect:




People will always complain about aliasing and stuff but TBH Polyphony are proficient in gfx :cool:
 
Because they see only the bad things,why i don't know,maybe forza fans....
Just kidding :P
Or maybe because "aliasing and stuff" are also a part of graphics and people care about those things too? Certainly, if you're playing on a big screen like many of us, aliasing is rather important. "Stuff", like framerates, screen tearing etc. might also be important to some. You don't get a pass just because you have pretty cars and lighting.
 
Or maybe because "aliasing and stuff" are also a part of graphics and people care about those things too? Certainly, if you're playing on a big screen like many of us, aliasing is rather important. "Stuff", like framerates, screen tearing etc. might also be important to some. You don't get a pass just because you have pretty cars and lighting.

I think he was just kidding :cool:
 
Or maybe because "aliasing and stuff" are also a part of graphics and people care about those things too? Certainly, if you're playing on a big screen like many of us, aliasing is rather important. "Stuff", like framerates, screen tearing etc. might also be important to some. You don't get a pass just because you have pretty cars and lighting.
Just kidding mate,why you get angry
 
Or maybe because "aliasing and stuff" are also a part of graphics and people care about those things too? Certainly, if you're playing on a big screen like many of us, aliasing is rather important. "Stuff", like framerates, screen tearing etc. might also be important to some. You don't get a pass just because you have pretty cars and lighting.
And i don't think gt it's only about pretty cars and lightning,it has tons of good things,with the hardware that has ps3,gt is an outstanting game, we can see features that even nextgen games haven't, but still we complain about a little bit of aliasing,just see the "magnificent" (as the reviews say)forza, no dynamic lightning,no real time reflexes,poor physics engine , with tons of aliasing ecc. i don't see anyone complaining about that, with forza it is all ok, or the super mega simulator assetto corsa wich the developers can't put in 2 light sources in a game with ps3 graphics or the frame rate drop down it is ok...no one complains about that.
Gt has almost all features,good physics,good graphics, cars and tracks are the most well modelled in market (if you want go in a thread gt vs forza and see this), but no gt is **** because it has standart cars (it is just a plus i don't know the reason to complain about that we all know that 1000 cars it is impossible to make in short time) it has aliasing ecc...
For me some people take for pretext some imperfections (wich all games have) from gt just to talk ****,thats my opinion.
Sorry if you don't understand i don't know very well english lenguage
 
GT6 is old game now on a PS3. But still has one of the best if not the best skid marks, smoke affect:




People will always complain about aliasing and stuff but TBH Polyphony are proficient in gfx :cool:


I would agreed that Skidmarks and tyre smoke are very pretty in Gt6 but the smoke is somehow...hmm too much in my opinion. It is always way too thick to compare to real life. hope they somehow improve this.



And i don't think gt it's only about pretty cars and lightning,it has tons of good things,with the hardware that has ps3,gt is an outstanting game, we can see features that even nextgen games haven't, but still we complain about a little bit of aliasing,just see the "magnificent" (as the reviews say)forza, no dynamic lightning,no real time reflexes,poor physics engine , with tons of aliasing ecc. i don't see anyone complaining about that, with forza it is all ok, or the super mega simulator assetto corsa wich the developers can't put in 2 light sources in a game with ps3 graphics or the frame rate drop down it is ok...no one complains about that.
Gt has almost all features,good physics,good graphics, cars and tracks are the most well modelled in market (if you want go in a thread gt vs forza and see this), but no gt is **** because it has standart cars (it is just a plus i don't know the reason to complain about that we all know that 1000 cars it is impossible to make in short time) it has aliasing ecc...
For me some people take for pretext some imperfections (wich all games have) from gt just to talk ****,thats my opinion.
Sorry if you don't understand i don't know very well english lenguage

Forza has poor physics? Do you played forza? It certainly isnt the best on physics department but it definitely isnt poor either. On standard of which game do you compared forza with ?

Assetto Corsa has ps3 graphics? Really? the game havent even came out then you had to say the framerate drop down ? where does your statement based from ? do you have a copy of ps4 assetto corsa demo ?



I would agreed GT physics is nice, GTS haven came out i wouldnt comment on that but on GT6, is there anyway the physics engine can simulate a lift off oversteer on FWD cars?
 
Last edited:
And i don't think gt it's only about pretty cars and lightning,it has tons of good things,with the hardware that has ps3,gt is an outstanting game, we can see features that even nextgen games haven't, but still we complain about a little bit of aliasing,just see the "magnificent" (as the reviews say)forza, no dynamic lightning,no real time reflexes,poor physics engine , with tons of aliasing ecc. i don't see anyone complaining about that, with forza it is all ok, or the super mega simulator assetto corsa wich the developers can't put in 2 light sources in a game with ps3 graphics or the frame rate drop down it is ok...no one complains about that.
Gt has almost all features,good physics,good graphics, cars and tracks are the most well modelled in market (if you want go in a thread gt vs forza and see this), but no gt is **** because it has standart cars (it is just a plus i don't know the reason to complain about that we all know that 1000 cars it is impossible to make in short time) it has aliasing ecc...
For me some people take for pretext some imperfections (wich all games have) from gt just to talk ****,thats my opinion.
Sorry if you don't understand i don't know very well english lenguage

..and others can't understand that games have genuine flaws and that it is ok for people to point out and criticise those flaws during a discussion. PD are extremely good at graphics, their lighting engine is second to none but they're also not perfect, it's ok to notice these imperfections. It's human nature.

All games have flaws and all games are criticised even if you want to claim otherwise. This is not the thread for that however.
 
I would agreed that Skidmarks and tyre smoke are very pretty in Gt6 but the smoke is somehow...hmm too much in my opinion. It is always way too thick to compare to real life. hope they somehow improve this.





Forza has poor physics? Do you played forza? It certainly isnt the best on physics department but it definitely isnt poor either. On standard of which game do you compared forza with ?

Assetto Corsa has ps3 graphics? Really? the game havent even came out then you had to say the framerate drop down ? where does your statement based from ? do you have a copy of ps4 assetto corsa demo ?



I would agreed GT physics is nice, GTS haven came out i wouldnt comment on that but on GT6, is there anyway the physics engine can simulate a lift off oversteer on FWD cars?

I don't know for me this looks poor physics,not at all realistic, if this to you seems realistic tell me the planet where you live.
.




And the standart it is gt6 obviously (only console sim you know...)



Yes assetto corsa have ps3 graphics,better not go to compare with gt6 graphics engine.
For lift oft oversteer,just umbalance your car and see
 
I don't know for me this looks poor physics,not at all realistic, if this to you seems realistic tell me the planet where you live.
.




And the standart it is gt6 obviously (only console sim you know...)



Yes assetto corsa have ps3 graphics,better not go to compare with gt6 graphics engine.
For lift oft oversteer,just umbalance your car and see



so you judging the physics based on the replay you seen but not play it in person ? That says pretty much about what kind of person you are.

Why do i need to unbalance a stock ride to have lift off oversteer? i tried with all stock car and there is none existed. 4wd too.

You can praise whatever you want about GT but the facts is this, your opinions isnt what the whole world thinks and it doesnt representating what everyone thinks.


 
Last edited:
so you judging the physics based on the replay you seen but not play it in person ? That says pretty much about what kind of person you are.

Why do i need to unbalance a stock ride to have lift off oversteer? i tried with all stock car and there is none existed. 4wd too.

You praise whatever you want about GT but the facts is this, your opinions isnt what the whole world thinks and it doesnt representating any concrete
Are you kidding me,try the nissan that you have in profile picture and see,and yes im judging the physics by eyes, real cars behaviours just don' seems like forza, this is reality my friend.
 
I don't know for me this looks poor physics,not at all realistic, if this to you seems realistic tell me the planet where you live.
.


And the standart it is gt6 obviously (only console sim you know...)


Yes assetto corsa have ps3 graphics,better not go to compare with gt6 graphics engine.
For lift oft oversteer,just umbalance your car and see

Place to discuss FM6 physics engine:

https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/board/forza-motorsport-6.383/

Place to discuss AC graphics:

https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/board/assetto-corsa.315/
 
so you judging the physics based on the replay you seen but not play it in person ? That says pretty much about what kind of person you are.

Why do i need to unbalance a stock ride to have lift off oversteer? i tried with all stock car and there is none existed. 4wd too.

You can praise whatever you want about GT but the facts is this, your opinions isnt what the whole world thinks and it doesnt representating what everyone thinks.




GT6 stock car setup are mostly a joke :P, the rear toe in, the weight distribution, springs etc, and often the stock setup are used to assess the driving experience. There's something strange about FF cars in GT6, the damper and ARB rates on all of them seems to be set in certain way by PD, and then there's the funny stoppie that AI could do on FF cars :lol:

Some videos for GT6 :



 
GT6 stock car setup are mostly a joke :P, the rear toe in, the weight distribution, springs etc, and often the stock setup are used to assess the driving experience. There's something strange about FF cars in GT6, the damper and ARB rates on all of them seems to be set in certain way by PD, and then there's the funny stoppie that AI could do on FF cars :lol:

Some videos for GT6 :




GT6 Forum
 
I knew you would quote me, so predictable, you should do the same to the one I quoted and the person he replied to.
AC Forum
FM6 Forum


Anyway, that was one time response to freedom, I see you liked both his AC video post, how sweet.
That part of the discussion was already dealt with twice:

@driver_34_ - head to either of these if you wish to discuss their respective features further. Though don't expect anybody to take you seriously in the former, if you haven't even played the game.
 
Back