Gran Turismo Sport: General Discussion
- Thread starter Formidable
- 47,132 comments
- 4,793,911 views
- 1,762
- Germany
- xXGalmOneXx
- xXGalm OneXx
Yes in free run I use it to see my car where is the Problem??? Why build beautiful premium cars when I cant even enjoy them in gameplay? Cant even rotate the camera around them to see the wheels spinning or dampers work. Which I personally love to see and is a standart in every other racing game by now unlike GT.
- 1,433
- Northern Ireland
Yep as far I've seen now, awful randomly placed roofcams are back, aswell as stiff narrow FOV Toy car chase cams...
I know I'm in the minority here but I have to defend GT's chase cam - I'm very bad at judging where a car is pointing and where it's going to go if it's off-axis on the screen, like you get with chase cams which are partly fixed to the track and allow the car to "rotate" to some degree. PD are the only people I know who still make a chase cam that is dead fixed to the direction of the car, and the GT games are the only ones I can use it without things going wrong quite quickly - so spare a thought for inept people like me
- 14,436
- Los Angeles, CA
- Lma_robot
- lImaRobotl
What makes no sense? What makes no sense is the two pictures you used for comparison, what exactly are you trying to show? There is also no fantasy cars, I think you might be mixing that up with GTS.Again, FH3 isn't a sim. It's a fun arcade game with fantasy/fast cars. It makes no sense.VS
- 1,762
- Germany
- xXGalmOneXx
- xXGalm OneXx
I guess he wanted to show that GT is a "sim" and Forza H3 "arcade" because the Lambo drives on gravel.
As what they are stand for you cant compare them thats true, GT is supposed to be a serious driving game, FH3 a fun racer. Still they are both driving games and still share alot of the same elements apart from the physics.
- 328
- United States
- pvvrry
I guess he wanted to show that GT is a "sim" and Forza H3 "arcade" because the Lambo drives on gravel.
As what they are stand for you cant compare them thats true, GT is supposed to be a serious driving game, FH3 a fun racer. Still they are both driving games and still share alot of the same elements apart from the physics.
- 14,436
- Los Angeles, CA
- Lma_robot
- lImaRobotl
- 2,170
- Sydney
- Inferno_251
- 328
- United States
- pvvrry
Technically he trashing the car. Does he even have dirt tires? It looks wet.
- 1,762
- Germany
- xXGalmOneXx
- xXGalm OneXx
Ok you have a point there!
👍@Heavyduke Well thats real life, but in a game all cars would be trashed really quick by crashes overreving etc. etc. if its GT FH or any other game
- 14,436
- Los Angeles, CA
- Lma_robot
- lImaRobotl
- 2,170
- Sydney
- Inferno_251
There are many supercars that have driven off road even if they weren't intended to, but I digress.
Getting back on topic (FH3 and GTS), you are ultimately comparing the experience with either game rather than inherent features, and this can apply to whatever racing games you compare
Last edited:
- 11,660
- GTP_Orido
Yes the GT3 chase cam was perfect. Would love to have it back as second option to the stiff far away oneAnd then let us use the right analog stick to rotate it around the car
You can change the camera position of chase cam in GT5/6 by using the server/client multi monitor options, reduce the angle of view to around 88-92 to get closer behind the car. Lower value will move it forward more and more.
- 1,984
- Barcelona
- mannjonusa
God, if I owned a supercar, I'd go nowhere near gravel... or kerbs...
...or roads, probably
- 3,280
- France
Sim or not sim, whatever sorry. Poly has to give us aswers. How Playground in two years managed to make FH3 and Sony fans are waiting for a big prologue. Gtsport looks boring for a casual player and I can understand it thanks to many basics flaws. It's crazy how GT is outdated with sounds, collisions, camera angles...
- 14,436
- Los Angeles, CA
- Lma_robot
- lImaRobotl
You do realize Turn 10 is not a sole developer who beats PD. Sure they can beat PD on development at anytime. They have huge resources and many workers to begin with.
The real problem is that nearly all racing game devs beats PD, even Evolution studios freaking Driveclub. I dont care about classic GT vs Forza crap. How PD will eventually beat Turn 10 is optional. I just need PD to up their game to match to their competition.
The real problem is that nearly all racing game devs beats PD, even Evolution studios freaking Driveclub. I dont care about classic GT vs Forza crap. How PD will eventually beat Turn 10 is optional. I just need PD to up their game to match to their competition.
- 5,351
- United States
- kudos00
I totally relate to you about that. I don't use the chase camera but when I've tried it with other games, GTA included, it disrupts my talentsI know I'm in the minority here but I have to defend GT's chase cam - . . . like you get with chase cams which are partly fixed to the track and allow the car to "rotate" to some degree. PD are the only people I know who still make a chase cam that is dead fixed to the direction of the car, and the GT games are the only ones I can use it without things going wrong quite quickly - so spare a thought for inept people like me
.That being said, PD should make a slight adjustment with each of their camera positions. I think it's been said that some cars in GT Sport will have adjustable camera positions; they must allow it for the interior cam of every car they model, dang nabbit.
