- 6,146
- Germany
Rare species like the people who camp out at Flugplatz?
There are no camping grounds near the Flugplatz. At least none that are allowed that is.
Rare species like the people who camp out at Flugplatz?
I cant understand why removing spectators would be the best thing to do, when simple modifications are all that is needed. That seems a way that will kill off an event.Because the track is known for it "nature" origin. It's not a "planned" race track like most of F1 courses. You also have large national parks with some very rare animals, some of which only live in the Eifel, very close to the track. Increasing the run off area or altering the track layout would not only cost a lot of money, which the new investor and the Nürburgring GmbH does not really have nor want to spend, and it would also mean potentially destroying forests to either make the track wider or add a run off area. It's a very fine balance, which makes it close to impossible, but also makes up the charme of the track.
The whole nature aspect is also the reason, why there is a jump in the first place. Adding higher fences or closing down the spectator area at this corner are the only, relatively cheap options to improve safety and prevent such accidents with human casualties, which were (until today) none at Flugplatz/Quiddelbacher Höhe. Other areas of the track have many more casualties to report, especially turns like Wippermann, Brünnchen and Eiskurve.
There are no camping grounds near the Flugplatz.
I cant understand why removing spectators would be the best thing to do, when simple modifications are all that is needed. That seems a way that will kill off an event.
I cant understand why removing spectators would be the best thing to do, when simple modifications are all that is needed. That seems a way that will kill off an event.
Well at least I know you're really German. I was talking about the area where the spectators gather.
There's no money currently for that. They spent too much on the whole Nürburgring experience bullcrap, we can be glad that the place still exists. Locking up the place for spectators would be cheaper, easier and had the same effect. By the way, they already lowered the hill some years ago, or at least flattened it slightly.So you're the CFO now? In case you haven't noticed, there is no drop-off on the outside of flugplatz. All they would need to do is drive a shovel and a bulldozer down the road and dig out the side of that hill to create more runoff. They could pave it or at least put enough space to add a secondary tire/foam barrier.
You do realise that no one on the actual 'Ring pays to watch racing don't you? You only pay to watch from the GP stands.
I would agree with the cost issue but I would think it naïve that after all is said and done that only spectator safety at one corner is going to come under scrutiny and change.Because removing a spectator "area" would cost nothing, whereas altering the layout or adding more runoff would cost money, which again the Nürburgring GmbH does not have. And killing off an event is taking it very far. At most 200 people watch at Flugplatz. Areas like Brünnchen, Eiskurve, Wippermann, Adenauer Forst and Pflanzgarten have MUCH more spectators, although these areas aren't as dangerous, except for Wippermann.
Another decent and not so expensive solution would be to just have steel barriers like at Wippermann there with higher fences, because the tyres are simply not the best solution for the speeds these cars are going.
A simple chicane to slow the cars before the hill would not be that difficult - whilst keeping the charm and spectators - there is obviously something needed as the safety measures in place failed to work as they were expected to. The FIA specs don't meet the needs at that corner.I can't work out how you can think that something a major as circuit modification is somehow magically easier than stopping people from spectating from there.
You do realise that no one on the actual 'Ring pays to watch racing don't you? You only pay to watch from the GP stands.
I cant understand why removing spectators would be the best thing to do, when simple modifications are all that is needed. That seems a way that will kill off an event.
Stronger fences could be dangerous for the drivers and also throw the cars back on the track, which isn't optimal either.Instead of more running off area, maybe they should consider higher and stronger fences.
Should be cheaper than bulldozing a hill.
Because the safety measures in place failed both the driver and spectators. Changes will inevitably happen - its naïve to think that just by banning spectators from certain areas is all that's or will be needed.It's cheap, it's easy, it's fast and it has no environmental impact. Tell me why it isn't a good idea? People are cut off from spectating all sorts of areas on the Nordschliefe yet they still come in their thousands year after year. Not many people actually go to Flugplatz during the N24, it's not a great place to watch from and cars getting airborne gets old pretty quick. Pflanzgarten is better for that sort of thing anyway, you can stand in relative safety and it's far more accessible.
As a note this thread has really gone to 🤬 in the last few hours. Plenty of armchair experts who've never visited the damn place making all sorts of ludicrous suggestions on what is best, or calling for all sorts of things to be banned.
How did it fail the driver? Jann is okay, without spectators there and the death of one, we wouldn't even discuss this yet. If the cars cannot race on the Nordschleife, the cars need to be changed, just as back then in Le Mans. If spectators stand on dangerous places, they need to move. It's pretty simple.Because the safety measures in place failed both the driver and spectators. Changes will inevitably happen - its naïve to think that just by banning spectators from certain areas is all that's or will be needed.
I would agree with the cost issue but I would think it naïve that after all is said and done that only spectator safety at one corner is going to come under scrutiny and change.
A simple chicane to slow the cars before the hill would not be that difficult - whilst keeping the charm and spectators - there is obviously something needed as they safety measures in place failed to work as they were expected to. The FIA specs don't meet the needs at that corner.
I would agree with the cost issue but I would think it naïve that after all is said and done that only spectator safety at one corner is going to come under scrutiny and change.
Stronger fences could be dangerous for the drivers and also throw the cars back on the track, which isn't optimal either.
EDIT: @boiltheocean made another good point: It's not even a great and common place to spectate. Flugplatz is usually quite empty. Schwedenkreuz and Pflanzgarten are much better places.
A simple chicane to slow the cars before the hill would not be that difficult - whilst keeping the charm and spectators - there is obviously something needed as the safety measures in place failed to work as they were expected to. The FIA specs don't meet the needs at that corner.
Not to mention it appears that the spectators were not behind the secondary fence like they should have been.How did it fail the driver? Jann is okay, without spectators there and the death of one, we wouldn't even discuss this yet. If the cars cannot race on the Nordschleife, the cars need to be changed, just as back then in Le Mans. If spectators stand on dangerous places, they need to move. It's pretty simple.
The safety measures in place were inadequate to the task this is plain as day for all to see - the follow on will be that the whole course will be assessed to meet any new standards that are required this will all cost more money as it is retrospectively being done now.
I'm sure your post add nothing useful to the thread.I'm sure you're an aerodynamic expert and can immediately evaluate all variables, including complete unknowns, to reach a solid and infallible conclusion on how this car took off.
Take Inoue may get a lot of stick, he's decided to blame Jan on twitter. Classy NOT
This probably means that he drives too fast.Weirdly the car looked to be airbourne before the crest finishes.
This probably means that he drives too fast.
Don't be a knob. It's never a driver's fault if a spectator dies. That's bad course design and a failure of safety considerations. The drivers race on the assumption that the circuit is safe. Do you think anyone would race if the spectators could have a picnic on the rumble strips?
I suppose with the flat bend in your rhetorical question, you may think that Ayrton Senna killed himself?
Take Inoue may get a lot of stick, he's decided to blame Jan on twitter. Classy NOT