GT Racing - GT1, GT3, Blancpain Endurance Series & National GT SeriesSports Cars 

The Nissan isn't the only GT3 car known to get it's front wheels up in the air, there was a temporary chicane put in at the Slovakiaring for GT races because a car (I'm pretty sure it was a 458 GT3) did a backflip a few years ago.
458 GT3 for BOP reasons have a small splitter compared to Audi so it's regulation's fault. For safety reason is better to keep a good amount of downforce on the front and eventually work with ballast instead.
 
Do we know if this was the new GT-R he was racing? That might explain the issue as the new package would have more unknowns for them to sort through.

EDIT: Looks like it was.
 
It seems quite clear from the video and pictures that there where a large number of spectators sitting between the two fences. You can see som campers chairs laying around the car as well. The car has definitely landed in the gap between the two fences.
 
Nissan released an statement
Investigation?

Way too much downforce on the rear end of the car.
That huge rear wing
and the front nose design unable to produce enough downforce even with that huge splitter and flaps.
It's like the Mercedes CLK LM crash. Same issues.
They knew this car was doing wheelies since 2013.
 
These pictures are taken in the corner after the jump though, it's almost impossible for a car to get air there.
The Nissan flew straight forward.
I wasn't aware of the video of today's crash when I posted that. The car flew straight forward but it seems that the curvature of the tire wall made the Nissan conclude its crash towards the crowded area.
 
His argument would be that he could have lifted before the point that the cars take off.
Possibly but who knows without proper information.

And it's near on offensive to say such a thing when there is no real evidence on what happened fully, the car is known to lift at that point as well.

As a racer he should know better.
 
Investigation?

Way too much downforce on the rear end of the car.
That huge rear wing
and the front nose design unable to produce enough downforce even with that huge splitter and flaps.
It's like the Mercedes CLK LM crash. Same issues.
They knew this car was doing wheelies since 2013.
I'm sure you're an aerodynamic expert and can immediately evaluate all variables, including complete unknowns, to reach a solid and infallible conclusion on how this car took off.
 
Just watched the video. "Whoa" was the first word that came out of my mouth. It's just like the incident with the Mercedes CLR, the front end of the GT-R just flew up. That is one horrendous crash.

And damn, the crash had a confirmed fatality. I'm just speechless right now, poor guy.
 
Investigation?

Way too much downforce on the rear end of the car.
That huge rear wing
and the front nose design unable to produce enough downforce even with that huge splitter and flaps.
It's like the Mercedes CLK LM crash. Same issues.
They knew this car was doing wheelies since 2013.

Just.. leave it to the experts. GT3 cars of ALL kinds have been doing wheelies or getting air at Flugplatz for some time. This was a horrific freak accident.
 
Aerodynamics are still a fairly unknown science, so I'm sure even experts would/could be stumped by what exactly happened to cause this
 
Some people are calling this the beginning of the end for GT3 cars on the 'Ring.
 
Do the GT3 cars have fully enclosed front arches? I believe all LMP cars now have to have a certain open area to reduce the chances of flipping.
 
Aerodynamics are still a fairly unknown science, so I'm sure even experts would/could be stumped by what exactly happened to cause this

The reason why it's a fairly unknown science is because it's nature. And nature can be unpredictable at times.

The only thing we can hope for is that Nissan would release some photos and footage of the incident from other angles (especially onboard footage) so that other people would have a better understanding of the crash.
 
hsv
Some people are calling this the beginning of the end for GT3 cars on the 'Ring.
Given how GT racing these days is basically all GT3, maybe the track will be changed first, either that or some formula changes to the cars downforce.
 
The reason why it's a fairly unknown science is because it's nature. And nature can be unpredictable at times.

The only thing we can hope for is that Nissan would release some photos and footage of the incident from other angles (especially onboard footage) so that other people would have a better understanding of the crash.
I don't fancy seeing someone killed from different angles thanks.
 
After watching the video I think two things seem clear to me that a) the car should not have been able to do that - as mentioned by @=drifting24/7= above, until all facts are collected and analysed attributing blame is not going to help, b) spectators should not be so close to a "dangerzone" I realise hindsight is what usually makes things safer for the future but it seems obvious after seeing how close track and spectators are that this was something that was more likely than less to happen - or at least the potential for this to happen seems extremely high.

Condolences to all involved.
 
I don't fancy seeing someone killed from different angles thanks.

I meant how the car's front end ended up flying in the air. Not how the car hit the spectator who just passed away. The car flying into the air is enough, no one needs to see the latter, gruesome bit except for the investigators.

I'm fairly sure he meant for Nissan to release it to the investigator's,

Yes, exactly. Thank you.
 
Anyone who says this is the end of GT3 on the Ring' is smoking some bad weed.
Respected sports car journalists. It's not a nice thing to hear, but there's a big element of truth in it. We've had years and years of close calls with accidents, but we are reaching a point where the cars are out-growing the track.
 
Anyone who says this is the end of GT3 on the Ring' is smoking some bad weed.
it's only a possibility. A bit far-fetched, yeah, but still a possibility. Formula 1 used to hold races around the Nordschleife part of the 'Ring, but because of repeated accidents and fatalities, they no longer hold races there. I don't see any reason how GT3 can be an exception to those circumstances.
 
I wouldn't call it the end of GT3, but between this and what was the wreck fest of Spa I do think that the BoP balancing point needs to be adjusted, these cars need to be slowed down in BHP and aerodynamic assistance,
 
Possibly but who knows without proper information.

And it's near on offensive to say such a thing when there is no real evidence on what happened fully, the car is known to lift at that point as well.

As a racer he should know better.

In simple terms a race drivers job is to get around the track as fast as possible without crashing, the only difference between taking a corner too fast and crashing, and taking a crest too fast and crashing, is usually the velocity of the car when it hits something... But in either case the driver failed to negotiate the course at a suitable speed. Nothing against Jann, but if he'd have taken a flat bend too fast and had an accident that resulted in a spectators death, would we look at it the same way?
 
For some reason I very usually cannot do the Nurburgring 24 Minutes race in GT6 without flipping over in Flugplatz. Get well, Jann. :(
 
In simple terms a race drivers job is to get around the track as fast as possible without crashing, the only difference between taking a corner too fast and crashing, and taking a crest too fast and crashing, is usually the velocity of the car when it hits something... But in either case the driver failed to negotiate the course at a suitable speed. Nothing against Jann, but if he'd have taken a flat bend too fast and had an accident that resulted in a spectators death, would we look at it the same way?
Who knows, Webber wasn't blamed for his flip at Lemans, even though before hand they actually where lifting knowing it was unstable.

We also don't know if Wind was involved, infact we know basically nothing.
 
In simple terms a race drivers job is to get around the track as fast as possible without crashing, the only difference between taking a corner too fast and crashing, and taking a crest too fast and crashing, is usually the velocity of the car when it hits something... But in either case the driver failed to negotiate the course at a suitable speed. Nothing against Jann, but if he'd have taken a flat bend too fast and had an accident that resulted in a spectators death, would we look at it the same way?
Crashing a car and fatalities/injuries to spectators are separate responsibilities - Jann is responsible for the car and the track event organisers are responsible for health and safety of its patrons.
 
In simple terms a race drivers job is to get around the track as fast as possible without crashing, the only difference between taking a corner too fast and crashing, and taking a crest too fast and crashing, is usually the velocity of the car when it hits something... But in either case the driver failed to negotiate the course at a suitable speed. Nothing against Jann, but if he'd have taken a flat bend too fast and had an accident that resulted in a spectators death, would we look at it the same way?

How can you be sure that the "failed to negotiate the course at a suitable"? If the driver did (in this case, Jann), How would you know? You weren't in the car when the blowover happened.

No one is exactly sure what happened, and how or why the blowover happened. Making assumptions and putting blame on people as this point is just ludicrous.
 
Back