- 15,532
- Cairo, Egypt
- GTP_SEMS
GT5 Latest News & Discussion
- Thread starter gamelle71
- 76,879 comments
- 9,654,923 views
- 2,789
- mount doom
- coilerdh
- no.no.
I'm sure it was reduced on purpose, to not show too much.
Hey Guys, I found this video on youtube showing the Toyota FT-86 getting some damage. You can clearly see some scratches, and doors open. The front and rear bumper also get really close to falling off. I haven't seen this before so sorry if this has been posted before.
[Youtube]v=Re3z7h3HruU[/Youtube]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Re3z7h3HruU
[Youtube]v=Re3z7h3HruU[/Youtube]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Re3z7h3HruU
- 6,804
- The Netherlands
Most concept cars are groundbreaking or futuristic just because they'll never be produced, just find it more fitting to celebrate a groundbreaking old car with an equally groundbraking concept especially since there are no restrictions to be considered.
Also would love to see the Miura and 250 GTO ( both so enormously important and influential within the automotive history ) included in GT5, i mean they have to be included, aren't they?
- 1,660
- P3nT4gR4m666
1) there isn't a game with anywhere near as many licensed cars as GT
2) If it's not realistic then what's the point? At least with no damage you have a point - "we don't do damage". That's fine - that's a design decision. Personally it's one I can get behind - if you want to see cars getting wrecked go play burnout but with this level of damage it just comes off as retarded. What's the point? Like at all? Why bother?
Seismica
Premium
- 4,346
- Guisborough
- GTP_Seismica
I think the mechanical damage is going to be the important part, that at least is going to have some degree of realism.
Obviously cosmetic damage has limitations. 1000 cars to re-license to allow extensive damage (i.e. for damage to have an effect on the cockpit and interior, which is often a restriction placed to promote the safety of vehicles), and then to implement realistic damage. This would be expensive and time consuming.
Personally I never really saw the need for damage. But now that it is in the game I am glad. Some damage is better than no damage in my opinion.
SrRd RacinG
(Banned)
- 2,948
- SrRd-RacinG
Any comestic damage is fine by me. It's a start. I'm sure it can progress in the future.
It'll be fun trying to avoid scraping your favorite cars in GT5.
It'll be fun trying to avoid scraping your favorite cars in GT5.
- 1,660
- P3nT4gR4m666
I'd be surprised if mechanical damage wasn't even more restricted on the licensed cars than the cosmetic. You honestly think Ferrari are going to be happy about their car limping round the track at 10mph with wonky steering when it looks like it just left the showroom? Think about it - the whole reason the damage is restricted in the first place is down to image.
- 24,659
- Anoka, MN
- 2,789
- mount doom
- coilerdh
- no.no.
Any comestic damage is fine by me. It's a start. I'm sure it can progress in the future.
It'll be fun trying to avoid scraping your favorite cars in GT5.
It would be awesome to pay for the repairs:tup:
- 30
- johny_k990
I remember there was meant to be Damage in prologue so Kaz said him self, but never delivered. Dont care much about damage, just like everyone ells i want to just get a release date already!
SrRd RacinG
(Banned)
- 2,948
- SrRd-RacinG
That's definitely something which has been discussed in brief. And I do NOT doubt PD has thought of it either. This also would mean that GT Mode races would have to yield more money. But I expect the GT credit "economy" to be far different than that of GT4. Especially when we speak of in depth tuning and perhaps in depth customization (as that'll likely cost us quite some credits)
- 2,789
- mount doom
- coilerdh
- no.no.
Who played World of Warcraft and had an epic armor se will know what i mean.
(the better the auto the higher the price for service)
Seismica
Premium
- 4,346
- Guisborough
- GTP_Seismica
And the possibility of online trading...
- 551
- Greece
- geo_opel_tigra
- 2,789
- mount doom
- coilerdh
- no.no.
SrRd RacinG
(Banned)
- 2,948
- SrRd-RacinG
- 1,934
- Nazareth/Israel
- GTClub_Wajdi
It's just a licence question,like in fm3!yes we know......but why
- 2,789
- mount doom
- coilerdh
- no.no.
I hope for unique tuning parts(won in online tournaments).
Seismica
Premium
- 4,346
- Guisborough
- GTP_Seismica
Yep
Why not, we've had car trading (from one memory card to another) in every previous game.
Theres no evidence to suggest we won't get this in GT5. But its not confirmed... It would be silly not to implement this feature in my opinion, it can create a good online community for trading old used cars and rare race cars.
I hope not... That would
Yep
Why not, we've had car trading (from one memory card to another) in every previous game.
Theres no evidence to suggest we won't get this in GT5. But its not confirmed... It would be silly not to implement this feature in my opinion, it can create a good online community for trading old used cars and rare race cars.
I hope not... That would suck.
Tht`s a great idea:tup:
Another possibility is trading schemes, Nascar 09 got something similar, you can upload your customs cars to your locker and your friends can download it. I`d like to have a public locker.
- 2,789
- mount doom
- coilerdh
- no.no.
Yep
Why not, we've had car trading (from one memory card to another) in every previous game.
Theres no evidence to suggest we won't get this in GT5. But its not confirmed... It would be silly not to implement this feature in my opinion, it can create a good online community for trading old used cars and rare race cars.
I hope not... That would suck.
Why? I think it's a good idea.
- 611
- PHILLSHZ
Errm ..... No not really,can you imagine being taken out from a love tap in your rear corner from someone who isn`t as clean a race as yourself and spiral into the wall and can`t afford to repair your cars damage. You would be mighty ticked off right??
Similar threads
