But again, everything that GT6 was going to be at release was made perfectly clear a month before release. Everything that GT6 was going to receive by update was made perfectly clear a month before release.
(Hypothetical)
As a mechanic(me and I am) do you think its okay to say 1 month before I'm done.
Okay, I got your car restored took 3+ years to finish,(after I promised a complete car on said date) but we have to wait for your radio, radiator, and transmission, Its gonna take another year+ before its done. But heres your car for now.
How well do you think that would fly? Id get sued(cant get fired I work for myself
) Either that or I would end up taking a loss of pay, cause of the extra time it took past a said date.(by loss I mean cut of pay not lost jobs(thats another story))(anyone that cares about their business would do that)
I get what you are saying, but
some(one(body(thing))), told some
huge lies, well before a month, before release. And their retracting of statements a month before should = false advertising/pretence on whoever's part.
I dont remember where I posted it to quote myself, but US has like 50% of what was advertised on the box.
Matchmaking/nope
Messaging in game/nope(via PSN message right now, technically...)
Friend invite in game/nope(same as above)
Add on content/can be debated but I say nope...(
I've only had to download the Anniversary cars)
Game play recording/nope
Upload of recorded game play/another nope.
And the only disclaimer on the US box is:
"Drive
future automotive designed concept vehicles with
Vision Gran Turismo*
(not yelling just how it is on the box...)
(Actual fine print)The * says... "Availability of vehicles may very."
Nothing about the other features/VGT cars being released at a future date. So the people who cant/dont go online got screwed by a box and thats ok?
Regardless of what they said a month before release. They did not fulfill their obligations described on the box or their interviews, before release or the month before release.
That = false advertising, like AT&T and what ever shoe company I mentioned earlier.
And if it doesn't, it's at least deserves false pretense, right?
pre·tense
noun \ˈprē-ˌten(t)s, pri-ˈ\
: a false reason or explanation that is used to hide the real purpose of something
: an act or appearance that looks real but is false
: a claim of having a particular quality, ability, condition, etc.
Attention to number 2&3...
I dont get how you can continue to say there is no case, when a mild class action, can easily be
started.
Yes it would take a mass that GTP might not be able to fulfill(petitions), but its a chance to show a company we are tired of their incomplete games*cough GT5 cough*(And they wont finish what they said on the GT5 box in 20 days. So how can we get said content with no servers? Unlike PC you cant get updates from 3rd party sites and use them legally, on a internet connected PS3.)