- 622
I was editing...accidentally pressed "post reply" on my stupid small phone screenDid you even read my original post? I don't think so.
I was editing...accidentally pressed "post reply" on my stupid small phone screenDid you even read my original post? I don't think so.
While that's true, the chassis number still doesn't match the door numbers.That's because you can change the number and put whatever you want.
MUST..NOT..WATCH..UNTIL..DECEMBER 6. DON'T..WANT..TO..SPOIL..IT..FOR..MYSELF.
...While that's true, the chassis number still doesn't match the door numbers.
Those six vertical lines in the power-torque/rpm graph... what gaps do they indicate?
I see 9 numbers if we use 1000rpm steps (0-8), but that doesn't work even if you count the borders of the graph as 0, respectively 8...
1286rpm steps? Can't be...
0-1500-(5x1000)-6500-8000? Must be.
Confusing
EDIT: Does anybody know if we still can see at what rpm peak torque, respectively peak power is?
I would need PD's master copy to do it, as the chassis number needs to be edited.IMHO, actual game site reviews are pointless.
...
Then change it yourself.
It works out if you assume the first and last gap is 1500 rpm. They do look slightly bigger. So the lines would be:
0 (far left)
1500
2500
3500
4500
5500
6500
8000 (far right)
Dumb, but it works. Have to see a few more to test out the theory.
Yeah it's getting pretty silly now.Not that graph, the one in the bottom left.
Yeah it's getting pretty silly now.
They could copy the one from GT1 for all I care, low definition and pixels, just give us a useful graph please.
Happens when people concentrate too much on looks instead of functionality, as so often nowadays.After all this time, it's still the best one... 15th anniversary of having useful tuning menus?
Try taking a look at the amount of reviews the predecessors have in return. There is no point to be missed, either. The game has done very well for a launch title & a game doesn't have to completely obliterate its predecessors in review scores to be astoundingly good.Still 10 points lower than its predecessors.
In that case I'd never speak of "astoundingly good".
You're kinda missing the point.
Just in case you didn't notice: I never said it's bad.
That graph taught me so much. I played GT1 up until 2008 since the day it came out, almost every single day, You see my parents were to cheep to buy me a ps2. I saved my money up and bought myself a ps3 in 2008 XDYeah it's getting pretty silly now.
They could copy the one from GT1 for all I care, low definition and pixels, just give us a useful graph please.
Why wouldn't it? The list of known compatible PS3 games for the Dualshock 4 is big.
Why use a second class control system? The mind boggles.With many copies out in the wild I'm hoping someone could confirm if this game is compatible with the DualShock 4.
Damn right.
So...if the only one of a car burns to the ground, does that mean we'll never see it as a premium car? 'Cause...umm...the Furai is no more:
http://www.topgear.com/uk/photos/mazda-furai-concept-fire-2013-11-29