GT6 News Discussion

  • Thread starter Matty
  • 8,352 comments
  • 834,660 views
Status
Not open for further replies.
Engine tuning A,B,C,Common with lever? (same on weight reduction)

No more possible to backup tunes by simple photo, not even car name on same sheet.
..Still want..

Hoping second patch for few setting sheets more, a,b,c(3) is not enough.
 
Ok you have brake balance, but what is braking sensitivity?

11106220605_e8b5f0b64c_c.jpg
 
Ok you have brake balance, but what is braking sensitivity?

11106220605_e8b5f0b64c_c.jpg
That would be for the LSD or Limited Slip Differential.

Edit: I think I might be wrong, going to check the other photos from the tuning settings.

Edit #2: Looks like I was right. Although in this car, it's just listed as a Differential Gear, that should change if you buy an LSD.
11106214025_85fc3b8545_c.jpg
 
I hope it has to do with how much pedal travel is needed to get the car to stop.. That would be awesome.
 
It looks like the gear ratio graph is useless and bugged as it's been since GT4. I wonder if we still have to do the "transmission flipping" hack/trick to be able to set up gear ratios properly.
 
Going based on actual reviews, FM5 has scored an 82 based on 47 critics. GT5 has an 84 based on 82. That does put both titles at outstandingly positive because the majority of high ranking scores on Metacritic (regarding games) is generally in the mid-to-high 80's, with only consecutive perfect scoring games in the 90's. When the embargo lifts in a week, we'll see what Metacritic puts the average GT6 score at.
Still 10 points lower than its predecessors.

In that case I'd never speak of "astoundingly good".


You're kinda missing the point.
Just in case you didn't notice: I never said it's bad.
 
Not images. A history of each chassis, including race #('s), engine replacements, restoration, owners and their history involving the car, etc.

CN4757:

63_Ferrari-250Gto_4757GT_DV-11_MH-08.jpg

CN3729:
Ferrari_250_GTO_Scaglietti_Berlinetta_sn-3729GT_1962_PBC0133_PB_concours_2011.jpg
 
Those six vertical lines in the power-torque/rpm graph... what gaps do they indicate?

I see 9 numbers if we use 1000rpm steps (0-8), but that doesn't work even if you count the borders of the graph as 0, respectively 8...

1286rpm steps? Can't be...

0-1500-(5x1000)-6500-8000? Must be.



Confusing



EDIT: Does anybody know if we still can see at what rpm peak torque, respectively peak power is?
 
Those six vertical lines in the power-torque/rpm graph... what gaps do they indicate?

I see 9 numbers if we use 1000rpm steps (0-8), but that doesn't work even if you count the borders of the graph as 0, respectively 8...

1286rpm steps? Can't be...

0-1500-(5x1000)-6500-8000? Must be.



Confusing

That's showing you a graph of the gear ratios, I'm not really sure how to explain it as I don't really understand how it works.
 
Not that graph, the one in the bottom left.
Power and torque curve relative to rpm

Edit:1k rpm and 8k rpm lines are not visible in the graph(not sure why)...but you can see the flow lines start and end where these 1k/8k rpm lines should be
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back